Fastest 1/4 time or Highest dyno numbers using XEDE
I have to say the the xede has more control over the evo then ANY COMPUTER OUT right now. The AEM will be good as well as the others. I called AEM to talk about it and they even said to wait to people get it figured out. Shiv was on the ball with this car and I think he knows more about the computer then any tuner so far.
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
They just have somthing against Shiv. Why I would never know maybe a outside influence that is pushing them to bad month Vishnu.
Come on guys the numbers are in front of you the facts are there. You have to admit it's pretty darn good.
NO hating here!! And I have learned alot from the DSM guys over the years.
I respect AMS. PRUVEN, Buscher and Mark from BM tranny.
My Best
Eric
They just have somthing against Shiv. Why I would never know maybe a outside influence that is pushing them to bad month Vishnu.
Come on guys the numbers are in front of you the facts are there. You have to admit it's pretty darn good.
NO hating here!! And I have learned alot from the DSM guys over the years.
I respect AMS. PRUVEN, Buscher and Mark from BM tranny.
My Best
Eric
Originally posted by Ryanmcd2
I have to say the the xede has more control over the evo then ANY COMPUTER OUT right now. The AEM will be good as well as the others. I called AEM to talk about it and they even said to wait to people get it figured out. Shiv was on the ball with this car and I think he knows more about the computer then any tuner so far.
I have to say the the xede has more control over the evo then ANY COMPUTER OUT right now. The AEM will be good as well as the others. I called AEM to talk about it and they even said to wait to people get it figured out. Shiv was on the ball with this car and I think he knows more about the computer then any tuner so far.
the problem with the EVO owners is not how we don't want to do our own work, there IS NOT A GOOD COMPUTER YET. I am talking DSMLink, AEM, Tec II, Motec, or anything else worth a crap for this car but the xede. Ya, you may hate it but it does more then anything else so far. In 6-8 months that will not be the case and AEM should be the computer to have.
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
Actually, I have complete control over my timing advance and air to fuel ratio. I tuned my own car using dsmlink. I'm the one that made it run a 12.21@113.5mph in the 1/4 with a 7cm Evo III 16G the first time I raced with the turbo. I built the engine in my car, too. http://www.geocities.com/shaperebuild/ That is my engine, my car, my (old) garage. I installed a new clutch and flywheel 3 weeks ago.
If old-school means tuning and building your own car, and new-school means dropping $1500 on a piggyback computer and cat-back and letting someone else tune it for you, then I'll gladly call myself "old-school." Of course, I also know how to spell without relying on phonics.
What have you studied and tuned to make yourself an expert? What does your timing advance curve look like?
Like I said before, you may be happy with what you got for $1500. I'm just saying that you could have gotten so much more for the money, and ended up with a lot more power.
Actually, I have complete control over my timing advance and air to fuel ratio. I tuned my own car using dsmlink. I'm the one that made it run a 12.21@113.5mph in the 1/4 with a 7cm Evo III 16G the first time I raced with the turbo. I built the engine in my car, too. http://www.geocities.com/shaperebuild/ That is my engine, my car, my (old) garage. I installed a new clutch and flywheel 3 weeks ago.
If old-school means tuning and building your own car, and new-school means dropping $1500 on a piggyback computer and cat-back and letting someone else tune it for you, then I'll gladly call myself "old-school." Of course, I also know how to spell without relying on phonics.
What have you studied and tuned to make yourself an expert? What does your timing advance curve look like?
Like I said before, you may be happy with what you got for $1500. I'm just saying that you could have gotten so much more for the money, and ended up with a lot more power.
Yep, but when the AEM comes out and you make a drag race map that runs the IC spray when the tps is over 50% and it sprays the whole run would that not rock? Or what about having a save gas map that runs say 9 pounds of boost and get 30mpg? It's there it just has to be done.
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
Actually, I have complete control over my timing advance and air to fuel ratio. I tuned my own car using dsmlink. I'm the one that made it run a 12.21@113.5mph in the 1/4 with a 7cm Evo III 16G the first time I raced with the turbo. I built the engine in my car, too. http://www.geocities.com/shaperebuild/ That is my engine, my car, my (old) garage. I installed a new clutch and flywheel 3 weeks ago.
If old-school means tuning and building your own car, and new-school means dropping $1500 on a piggyback computer and cat-back and letting someone else tune it for you, then I'll gladly call myself "old-school." Of course, I also know how to spell without relying on phonics.
What have you studied and tuned to make yourself an expert? What does your timing advance curve look like?
Like I said before, you may be happy with what you got for $1500. I'm just saying that you could have gotten so much more for the money, and ended up with a lot more power.
Actually, I have complete control over my timing advance and air to fuel ratio. I tuned my own car using dsmlink. I'm the one that made it run a 12.21@113.5mph in the 1/4 with a 7cm Evo III 16G the first time I raced with the turbo. I built the engine in my car, too. http://www.geocities.com/shaperebuild/ That is my engine, my car, my (old) garage. I installed a new clutch and flywheel 3 weeks ago.
If old-school means tuning and building your own car, and new-school means dropping $1500 on a piggyback computer and cat-back and letting someone else tune it for you, then I'll gladly call myself "old-school." Of course, I also know how to spell without relying on phonics.
What have you studied and tuned to make yourself an expert? What does your timing advance curve look like?
Like I said before, you may be happy with what you got for $1500. I'm just saying that you could have gotten so much more for the money, and ended up with a lot more power.
But if I had a cheaper car I would be more gun ho about doing my owen tuning.
Eric
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Shape the motor looks good!! Why did you not o-ring the block?
Off your link you posted.
Shape the motor looks good!! Why did you not o-ring the block?
Off your link you posted.
A headgasket is like a fuse. It will be the first thing to go when you detonate badly. If you keep all that pressure inside the combustion chamber with an O-ring, you will blow a hole in something else.
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
There is no need. If you want to go for 600hp, sure, go ahead and O-ring. Below that, just use ARP head studs and a good head gasket (stock is good for the 400hp to 500hp range). If you blow your headgasket, chances are that if you had O-rings, you would have blown a hole in your piston instead.
A headgasket is like a fuse. It will be the first thing to go when you detonate badly. If you keep all that pressure inside the combustion chamber with an O-ring, you will blow a hole in something else.
There is no need. If you want to go for 600hp, sure, go ahead and O-ring. Below that, just use ARP head studs and a good head gasket (stock is good for the 400hp to 500hp range). If you blow your headgasket, chances are that if you had O-rings, you would have blown a hole in your piston instead.
A headgasket is like a fuse. It will be the first thing to go when you detonate badly. If you keep all that pressure inside the combustion chamber with an O-ring, you will blow a hole in something else.
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
No, I'm talking about the stock Evo VIII ECU. This stuff is all covered in the Evo Technical Manual.
No, I'm talking about the stock Evo VIII ECU. This stuff is all covered in the Evo Technical Manual.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
You would definitely make more power than you have right now with all of those mods. What is so magic about the XEDE that makes you think it would do so much better than an AFC and a boost controller?
You would definitely make more power than you have right now with all of those mods. What is so magic about the XEDE that makes you think it would do so much better than an AFC and a boost controller?
), realtime map switching via toggle switch, and half a dozen other features that I'd rather not disclose yet and, yes, the XEDE will outperform any AFC/EBC combo. In fact, it even out-performs the $3000 TEC3 stand-alone system I use for reference when starting application design. Regards,
Shiv
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Uh, where do I start. Okay, here goes: The XEDE actually manipulate the raw knock sensor signal to prevent excessive retard under sudden transient conditions. It also delivers an acceleration enrichement during said load transients to prevent the momentary lean/dead spot often encountered with fuel-only tuning. It also offers full 3D mapping of boost which means that the boost spike that EVOs often see when their exhaust is opened up can be eliminated. Boost can also be programmed to taper just before redline to prevent the knock events that usually occur when whacking against the fuel limiter. The XEDE also acts as a MAF filter, smoothening out extraneous MAF noise which impacts subjective engine smoothness. Throw the ability to control *timing* in 3 dimenstions which is critical to making consistent power in octane limited situations (I can't believe some self proclaimed internet tuners are suggested that this isn't necessary with bolt-on parts
), realtime map switching via toggle switch, and half a dozen other features that I'd rather not disclose yet and, yes, the XEDE will outperform any AFC/EBC combo. In fact, it even out-performs the $3000 TEC3 stand-alone system I use for reference when starting application design.
Regards,
Shiv
Uh, where do I start. Okay, here goes: The XEDE actually manipulate the raw knock sensor signal to prevent excessive retard under sudden transient conditions. It also delivers an acceleration enrichement during said load transients to prevent the momentary lean/dead spot often encountered with fuel-only tuning. It also offers full 3D mapping of boost which means that the boost spike that EVOs often see when their exhaust is opened up can be eliminated. Boost can also be programmed to taper just before redline to prevent the knock events that usually occur when whacking against the fuel limiter. The XEDE also acts as a MAF filter, smoothening out extraneous MAF noise which impacts subjective engine smoothness. Throw the ability to control *timing* in 3 dimenstions which is critical to making consistent power in octane limited situations (I can't believe some self proclaimed internet tuners are suggested that this isn't necessary with bolt-on parts
), realtime map switching via toggle switch, and half a dozen other features that I'd rather not disclose yet and, yes, the XEDE will outperform any AFC/EBC combo. In fact, it even out-performs the $3000 TEC3 stand-alone system I use for reference when starting application design. Regards,
Shiv
Originally posted by Ryanmcd2
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
The AEM definitely has more features than an XEDE. It is also a whole lot more difficult to set up to get the car to run right in all conditions. The base AEM maps are pretty much crap. So really, I think that there is room for a product that has good on-the-fly adjustability, yet still maintains the drivability of the stock ECU.
The XEDE may fit that bill. I just think it is too expensive for a piggyback.
Last edited by ShapeGSX; Oct 7, 2003 at 01:42 PM.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by Ryanmcd2
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
Shape GSX writes..
The XEDE can not account for increased injector dead time when you upgrade to larger injectors. Accounting for injector dead time is a huge part of getting a car to run right with larger injectors.
Regards,
shiv



