Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Fastest 1/4 time or Highest dyno numbers using XEDE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #91  
Ryanmcd2's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
I have to say the the xede has more control over the evo then ANY COMPUTER OUT right now. The AEM will be good as well as the others. I called AEM to talk about it and they even said to wait to people get it figured out. Shiv was on the ball with this car and I think he knows more about the computer then any tuner so far.



Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky


They just have somthing against Shiv. Why I would never know maybe a outside influence that is pushing them to bad month Vishnu.

Come on guys the numbers are in front of you the facts are there. You have to admit it's pretty darn good.

NO hating here!! And I have learned alot from the DSM guys over the years.

I respect AMS. PRUVEN, Buscher and Mark from BM tranny.

My Best

Eric
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:31 AM
  #92  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Ryanmcd2
I have to say the the xede has more control over the evo then ANY COMPUTER OUT right now. The AEM will be good as well as the others. I called AEM to talk about it and they even said to wait to people get it figured out. Shiv was on the ball with this car and I think he knows more about the computer then any tuner so far.
The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:32 AM
  #93  
Ryanmcd2's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
the problem with the EVO owners is not how we don't want to do our own work, there IS NOT A GOOD COMPUTER YET. I am talking DSMLink, AEM, Tec II, Motec, or anything else worth a crap for this car but the xede. Ya, you may hate it but it does more then anything else so far. In 6-8 months that will not be the case and AEM should be the computer to have.


Originally posted by ShapeGSX


Actually, I have complete control over my timing advance and air to fuel ratio. I tuned my own car using dsmlink. I'm the one that made it run a 12.21@113.5mph in the 1/4 with a 7cm Evo III 16G the first time I raced with the turbo. I built the engine in my car, too. http://www.geocities.com/shaperebuild/ That is my engine, my car, my (old) garage. I installed a new clutch and flywheel 3 weeks ago.

If old-school means tuning and building your own car, and new-school means dropping $1500 on a piggyback computer and cat-back and letting someone else tune it for you, then I'll gladly call myself "old-school." Of course, I also know how to spell without relying on phonics.

What have you studied and tuned to make yourself an expert? What does your timing advance curve look like?

Like I said before, you may be happy with what you got for $1500. I'm just saying that you could have gotten so much more for the money, and ended up with a lot more power.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #94  
Ryanmcd2's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Yep, but when the AEM comes out and you make a drag race map that runs the IC spray when the tps is over 50% and it sprays the whole run would that not rock? Or what about having a save gas map that runs say 9 pounds of boost and get 30mpg? It's there it just has to be done.


Originally posted by ShapeGSX


The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:36 AM
  #95  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally posted by ShapeGSX


The computer is essentially a 2G DSM ECU with a few more extra features like the clutch input to the ECU that momentarily changes the air to fuel ratio for better emissions, the variable fuel pump voltage controller, the intercooler sprayer controller, better boost control, different timing and fuel maps, etc...
Are you talking about the AEM EMS here? If so you're missing a lot of features.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #96  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally posted by ShapeGSX


Actually, I have complete control over my timing advance and air to fuel ratio. I tuned my own car using dsmlink. I'm the one that made it run a 12.21@113.5mph in the 1/4 with a 7cm Evo III 16G the first time I raced with the turbo. I built the engine in my car, too. http://www.geocities.com/shaperebuild/ That is my engine, my car, my (old) garage. I installed a new clutch and flywheel 3 weeks ago.

If old-school means tuning and building your own car, and new-school means dropping $1500 on a piggyback computer and cat-back and letting someone else tune it for you, then I'll gladly call myself "old-school." Of course, I also know how to spell without relying on phonics.

What have you studied and tuned to make yourself an expert? What does your timing advance curve look like?

Like I said before, you may be happy with what you got for $1500. I'm just saying that you could have gotten so much more for the money, and ended up with a lot more power.
I don't have to show anyone my backgound to justify what I know. Bottom line this thread was made for a quetion and I answered it to the best of my knowlage. And Yes english is not my 1st lang so make fun of my spelling all you want. Fact of the matter is I still made very strong power with xede and cat back. I would not be able make the same power with a S-AFC and a cat back and MBC or EBC. I would be down alot and with a lean A/F compared to my tune. Just because I'm smart enough to know my limitions on tuning and can afford to have the best in the bizz do the dirty work for me does not mean I don't know anything. Just means I'm not ready to have to rebuild my brand new car with only 4000 miles on the clock, from learning the hardway.

But if I had a cheaper car I would be more gun ho about doing my owen tuning.

Eric
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:43 AM
  #97  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Shape the motor looks good!! Why did you not o-ring the block?
Off your link you posted.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #98  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Shape the motor looks good!! Why did you not o-ring the block?
Off your link you posted.
There is no need. If you want to go for 600hp, sure, go ahead and O-ring. Below that, just use ARP head studs and a good head gasket (stock is good for the 400hp to 500hp range). If you blow your headgasket, chances are that if you had O-rings, you would have blown a hole in your piston instead.

A headgasket is like a fuse. It will be the first thing to go when you detonate badly. If you keep all that pressure inside the combustion chamber with an O-ring, you will blow a hole in something else.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #99  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Originally posted by HobieKopek


Are you talking about the AEM EMS here? If so you're missing a lot of features.
No, I'm talking about the stock Evo VIII ECU. This stuff is all covered in the Evo Technical Manual.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:52 AM
  #100  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally posted by ShapeGSX


There is no need. If you want to go for 600hp, sure, go ahead and O-ring. Below that, just use ARP head studs and a good head gasket (stock is good for the 400hp to 500hp range). If you blow your headgasket, chances are that if you had O-rings, you would have blown a hole in your piston instead.

A headgasket is like a fuse. It will be the first thing to go when you detonate badly. If you keep all that pressure inside the combustion chamber with an O-ring, you will blow a hole in something else.
Got ya!
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:55 AM
  #101  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally posted by ShapeGSX


No, I'm talking about the stock Evo VIII ECU. This stuff is all covered in the Evo Technical Manual.
I wouldn't know. I don't drive an Evo, nor do I care much about them. At least I'm on the same page now.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 12:59 PM
  #102  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by ShapeGSX


You would definitely make more power than you have right now with all of those mods. What is so magic about the XEDE that makes you think it would do so much better than an AFC and a boost controller?
Uh, where do I start. Okay, here goes: The XEDE actually manipulate the raw knock sensor signal to prevent excessive retard under sudden transient conditions. It also delivers an acceleration enrichement during said load transients to prevent the momentary lean/dead spot often encountered with fuel-only tuning. It also offers full 3D mapping of boost which means that the boost spike that EVOs often see when their exhaust is opened up can be eliminated. Boost can also be programmed to taper just before redline to prevent the knock events that usually occur when whacking against the fuel limiter. The XEDE also acts as a MAF filter, smoothening out extraneous MAF noise which impacts subjective engine smoothness. Throw the ability to control *timing* in 3 dimenstions which is critical to making consistent power in octane limited situations (I can't believe some self proclaimed internet tuners are suggested that this isn't necessary with bolt-on parts ), realtime map switching via toggle switch, and half a dozen other features that I'd rather not disclose yet and, yes, the XEDE will outperform any AFC/EBC combo. In fact, it even out-performs the $3000 TEC3 stand-alone system I use for reference when starting application design.

Regards,
Shiv
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 01:08 PM
  #103  
Ryanmcd2's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.




Originally posted by shiv@vishnu


Uh, where do I start. Okay, here goes: The XEDE actually manipulate the raw knock sensor signal to prevent excessive retard under sudden transient conditions. It also delivers an acceleration enrichement during said load transients to prevent the momentary lean/dead spot often encountered with fuel-only tuning. It also offers full 3D mapping of boost which means that the boost spike that EVOs often see when their exhaust is opened up can be eliminated. Boost can also be programmed to taper just before redline to prevent the knock events that usually occur when whacking against the fuel limiter. The XEDE also acts as a MAF filter, smoothening out extraneous MAF noise which impacts subjective engine smoothness. Throw the ability to control *timing* in 3 dimenstions which is critical to making consistent power in octane limited situations (I can't believe some self proclaimed internet tuners are suggested that this isn't necessary with bolt-on parts ), realtime map switching via toggle switch, and half a dozen other features that I'd rather not disclose yet and, yes, the XEDE will outperform any AFC/EBC combo. In fact, it even out-performs the $3000 TEC3 stand-alone system I use for reference when starting application design.

Regards,
Shiv
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #104  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Ryanmcd2
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
The XEDE can not account for increased injector dead time when you upgrade to larger injectors. Accounting for injector dead time is a huge part of getting a car to run right with larger injectors. The XEDE also can not raise your rev limit. It doesn't have nitrous controls (as far as I know). The EMS also does datalogging in RAM without a laptop.

The AEM definitely has more features than an XEDE. It is also a whole lot more difficult to set up to get the car to run right in all conditions. The base AEM maps are pretty much crap. So really, I think that there is room for a product that has good on-the-fly adjustability, yet still maintains the drivability of the stock ECU.

The XEDE may fit that bill. I just think it is too expensive for a piggyback.

Last edited by ShapeGSX; Oct 7, 2003 at 01:42 PM.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #105  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by Ryanmcd2
So can it do everything the AEM can do? The reason I ask is because having a map that get 30mph but has less power then stock would be nice, also what about controling the IC Spray can the xede do that? I am not trying to be a *** I just do not know the power of it, I have worked with the tecIII on a turbo NSX and it works great.
No, it cannot do everything the AEM, TEC3, or other stand-alones can do. It only has one GPO for things like water injection, NOS control, etc,. But using it for IC Spray is not a problem. There is already an output on the XEDE harness to drive a water spray pump. The software even has water spray parameters to dictate under what conditions the water spray should activate and how long it stays on once triggered. Real easy stuff. Go ahead and download the free software (XMAP v.2) and see for yourself.

Shape GSX writes..
The XEDE can not account for increased injector dead time when you upgrade to larger injectors. Accounting for injector dead time is a huge part of getting a car to run right with larger injectors.
That's only if the injector you are uprading to needs to are *much bigger* than stock, mechanically slower to respond or more susesptible to voltage fluctuations. In that case, adjusting min. injector on-time, voltage compensations, etc,. is useful. However, for simply installing drop-in 650-750cc/min injectors, the MAF trim feature in the XEDE has proven to be enough to acheive perfectly stock drivability characteristics. For those wanting to install 800+cc low impedance aftermarket injectors, a stand alone with dedicated peak and hold injector drivers is the way to go.

Regards,
shiv



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 AM.