Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

compression test on cammed Evo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
v8<turbo4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: marquette MI
compression test on cammed Evo

Hey so i have searched around and i found alot of results on what the compression should be and it looks like it should be around 140 for an EVO 9 please correct me if im wrong.

I also heard that cammed cars will show lower compression then a stock car is this true?

i heard that a cammed evo should be around the low 100s

also do the numbers matter that much or is it just to make sure all the cylinders are similar.

Let me know

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #2  
v8<turbo4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: marquette MI
any one know?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #3  
EvoNiner1986's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth
140 sounds about right for Evo 9 due to the MIVEC. Evo 8s have higher compression than Evo 9s do.

I wouldn't be TOO concerned about the reading, but rather the variance between the cylinders (no more than 10-15 variance)
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #4  
prodigy1210's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 161
Likes: 1
From: Manchester, UK
How much are you reading currently?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #5  
getsideways's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 924
Likes: 2
From: WI
just to give you insight i have gsc s1s in my 9 its around 130 with 5psi total variance across the board

My fp4r cammed evo 8 was in the high 130s low 140s after a fresh headgasket ,, those are fairly large cams ..
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
v8<turbo4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: marquette MI
ok so a 9 with upgraded Cams should be still in 130s would it be bad if it was low 100 high 90s?

also does elevation have anything to do with it.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
Tsurugi-san's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 982
Likes: 1
From: NW Arkansas -- Land O' Twisties
My Buschur built 2.0 has a lower compression ratio. Still within variance, but they're all around 110. For what it's worth.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:25 PM
  #8  
v8<turbo4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: marquette MI
is 110 bad? or is that normal for a cammed EVO?

Also i was thinking higher elevation = thinner air

does that mean at high elevation you can run more boost then you could at sea level because the air is less dense?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #9  
Aven's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Crystal Lake, IL
This may be an uninformed question, but why would a cam affect compression. Aren't the valves closed during compression? Don't cams only affect the degree of which a valve would open? I know in rotors with a very aggresive port sometimes the exhaust port would remain open almost always but I did not think this was the case with piston motors.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 06:44 AM
  #10  
Murf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: Reno,NV
damn that is some low #s. did a comp. check on my 8 w/ hks 272's when I found my bad cyl. I was at 150 across except in the bad one which was 120.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 07:06 AM
  #11  
justa4banger's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: underground
wow... that 120 cylinder i gona kill your performance....
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 08:07 AM
  #12  
Murf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: Reno,NV
That is one way of putting it hahah...engine has since been rebuilt almost done with break in. did a test after first oil change and it was 160, 145, 155, 160. that was only after 250 miles, so not bad for an engine that has not been seated yet.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 09:42 AM
  #13  
EvoRob22's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Coopersburg, PA
1) Should be around 140

2) Cams should not change compression because the valves are closed when doing a compression check

3) They should all be relatively the same. They should all be around 140. If one is lower than it shows premature wear in that cylinder. If it is lower in all the cylinders than it shows wear in all cylinders. They should all be 140.

4) If you have a lower compression do a wet compression check. This is squirting some oil in the cylinder. If the compression increases then drops after a while you have a worn piston rings. The oil will sit inbetween the cylinder wall and the piston wall and when the oil gets past the compression will then lower again.

Good luck. Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #14  
06ravenmr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 454
Likes: 1
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by Murf
damn that is some low #s. did a comp. check on my 8 w/ hks 272's when I found my bad cyl. I was at 150 across except in the bad one which was 120.
well excluding ur one bad cylender mine reads 150 psi all cylenders too with hks 272's
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
v8<turbo4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: marquette MI
so it seems like cams shouldnt affect compression at all.

Thanks for the help guys
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 PM.