Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Co-efficient drag of Evo without the wing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #46  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
Yokohama street and Hoosier drag
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #47  
HGOTBOOST's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
Yokohama street and Hoosier drag
I like Hoosier they're good.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #48  
Jeffs2006EVOIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 1
From: SoCal

Where do you find this stuff??? I am glad its here. You have any more info like that on the IX?? Good Stuff
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #49  
wasFWDnowAWD's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
so VG reduce drag and lift by 0.006
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 06:50 AM
  #50  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
That's crazy that the vg actually is functional! I thought it was just something for look! I wonder if aftermarket ones for the viii are just as functional?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 07:10 AM
  #51  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
If it's molded from the OE part, sure. If not, probably not ... or at least not as functional. No aftermarket VG is wind tunnel tested that I know of.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 07:27 AM
  #52  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
If not wind tunnel tested could mess up the areo of the car design? Damn! Another worthless piece on my car! Lol! What about the apr canards?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #53  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
You would probably be very surprised how little variance it takes to drastically alter the performance/effect of aerodynamic devices.

Grant it it's at a totally different level than your average streetcar/racecars but, we fight everyday for something as small as .010" on things like splitter height because they are that critical to the aero balance of the car.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #54  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
If not wind tunnel tested could mess up the areo of the car design? Damn! Another worthless piece on my car! Lol! What about the apr canards?
Canards are kind of hard to mess up. they are likely working. But, with that said, the extra DF on the nose will make the rear feel that much lighter at speed, so more reason to keep the wing.

If you want to try for more top end ... lose the canards before the wing.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #55  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
Damn again! I should have did this research before drilling holes in my bumper! Lol!
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #56  
laramie_05MR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 1
From: texas
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
damn! what speed do you say would be safe till then? reason is a closed airport for racing. allot of domestic cars which insist on going at least 180mph. so i just wanna play it safe! thanks for your help guys!
I've had mine up to 167mph at the Texas Mile. The car was ungodly stable EVEN when I was braking. I have had it up above 175 when testing for the Mile but I just coasted after the pull.


Laramie
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #57  
laramie_05MR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 1
From: texas
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
Damn again! I should have did this research before drilling holes in my bumper! Lol!
Loose the canards, wing and fill the holes. Are you doing top speed runs on a closed course or "closed course?" If you are racing legit cover the oil cooler and the other hole on the lower left side of the bumper. Also fill the holes to the left and right of the Mitsu emblem. If you are still using the factory air inlet dont fill the left side. Any more questions check out AMS's thread where they posted pics of converting their car to run the Texas Mile.


Laramie
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 02:12 PM
  #58  
wirx's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
I tried yesterday with wing and without.
With wing 253km/h without 258km/h (161mph), it's about 3mph difference. Without wing was car after 230km/h+ much harder to drive, not recommended for newbie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2VmCdKX5E8
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #59  
novem's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 452
Likes: 1
From: So-Cal
If you read up on the changes between the VII and VIII (&IX) the differences in aero parts are always increased in a more efficient way. The wing on the VII VS the VIII for example are improved aerodynamically, and not for esthetic reasons, as many people think. I guess that's the reason it's called an Evolution.

N
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 10:33 PM
  #60  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
I went wingless along time ago and I love it only feel's scary after 187mph but nothing you can't handle pizza boy
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:40 PM.