ETS Tubular Stock Replacement Manifold
Dec 21, 2010, 01:47 PM
#1
ETS Tubular Stock Replacement Manifold
I've been searching this place forever trying to find some SOLID numbers on the ETS 8/9 Tubular Replacement Stock Manifold vs stock (or anything for that matter)... Sure it looks good but im not willing to spend 700+ dollars on looks... I will be upgrading to a fpred very soon and i would like to get the most out of my set-up... Shearer is on the top of my list... next is Full Race... but if ETS costs 100 LESS than the Full Race and delivers the same power than u get my drift...
http://www.extremeturbosystems.com/M...duct_info.html
Does anybody have a link on here or any other website with this info...
http://www.extremeturbosystems.com/M...duct_info.html
Does anybody have a link on here or any other website with this info...
Dec 21, 2010, 03:02 PM
#4
We don't do a lot of stock frame turbochargers here. I just called a couple of our tuner shops and the common response was around 20whp on pump gas with 1.50". The E85 gain isn't so much and they would recommend 1.25" runners on it. We have sent out a ton of these manifolds, I wish I had a dyno sheet handy.
Dec 21, 2010, 03:07 PM
#5
Michael I can do a back to back on GASOLINE when I switch back to stock for the Rally testing I want to do.
To answer the general question we have tested these only on E85 at the moment here, but I did test a X MR with a header on Gasoline. The highest prior number I had gotten out of a X was 328-330 and I have done this numerous times so I feel thats pretty solid result for the mods. This car had all the same ones and the ETS replacement header. It put down 340, 339, 341. So on average it seems 12-13whp, but the X MR does suck up power more than a comparable GSR. For the percentage loss vs what a GSR normally does with these mods (minus the header) there is a about a 10% difference so that 13 grows to 15whp pretty easy. The Full Race I have tested are somewhere between 15-20whp on average conditions on our dyno, but I only tested one of those as well so I dont have alot of back to back comparisons.
To answer the general question we have tested these only on E85 at the moment here, but I did test a X MR with a header on Gasoline. The highest prior number I had gotten out of a X was 328-330 and I have done this numerous times so I feel thats pretty solid result for the mods. This car had all the same ones and the ETS replacement header. It put down 340, 339, 341. So on average it seems 12-13whp, but the X MR does suck up power more than a comparable GSR. For the percentage loss vs what a GSR normally does with these mods (minus the header) there is a about a 10% difference so that 13 grows to 15whp pretty easy. The Full Race I have tested are somewhere between 15-20whp on average conditions on our dyno, but I only tested one of those as well so I dont have alot of back to back comparisons.
Trending Topics
Dec 21, 2010, 03:25 PM
#8
Michael I can do a back to back on GASOLINE when I switch back to stock for the Rally testing I want to do.
To answer the general question we have tested these only on E85 at the moment here, but I did test a X MR with a header on Gasoline. The highest prior number I had gotten out of a X was 328-330 and I have done this numerous times so I feel thats pretty solid result for the mods. This car had all the same ones and the ETS replacement header. It put down 340, 339, 341. So on average it seems 12-13whp, but the X MR does suck up power more than a comparable GSR. For the percentage loss vs what a GSR normally does with these mods (minus the header) there is a about a 10% difference so that 13 grows to 15whp pretty easy. The Full Race I have tested are somewhere between 15-20whp on average conditions on our dyno, but I only tested one of those as well so I dont have alot of back to back comparisons.
To answer the general question we have tested these only on E85 at the moment here, but I did test a X MR with a header on Gasoline. The highest prior number I had gotten out of a X was 328-330 and I have done this numerous times so I feel thats pretty solid result for the mods. This car had all the same ones and the ETS replacement header. It put down 340, 339, 341. So on average it seems 12-13whp, but the X MR does suck up power more than a comparable GSR. For the percentage loss vs what a GSR normally does with these mods (minus the header) there is a about a 10% difference so that 13 grows to 15whp pretty easy. The Full Race I have tested are somewhere between 15-20whp on average conditions on our dyno, but I only tested one of those as well so I dont have alot of back to back comparisons.
Last edited by e4on2e5; Dec 21, 2010 at 04:04 PM.
Dec 21, 2010, 05:01 PM
#10
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: so cal 760/951
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
subscribed.i am interested in results as well.im running 2.2 fpblack setup with ported stock manifold .i was also interested in the full race manifold .heard good things about full race manifold . but since i run more ets goodies i might as well look into picking up one these badboys...
Dec 21, 2010, 09:27 PM
#14
For a tubular manifold my vote goes to Toxicfab...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...nifold-18.html
He uses 1.5" runners...he can also make one that will work with a stock heat shield...Check out TCC's coating thread, he just coated some for Collin's customers...I got mine coated by TCC...The manifold & coating job are amazing...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...nifold-18.html
He uses 1.5" runners...he can also make one that will work with a stock heat shield...Check out TCC's coating thread, he just coated some for Collin's customers...I got mine coated by TCC...The manifold & coating job are amazing...
Dec 21, 2010, 09:30 PM
#15
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: so cal 760/951
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im curious in response,spool characteristics and such ..mid range to top end power or low end to mid range response.fpred and stock block will have different characteristics then my fpblack and 2.2 stroker.but should have some what similar gains..