Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

255 WHP w TBE and Boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 10:26 AM
  #1  
Camrymatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Florida
255 WHP w TBE and Boost?

Quick confirm, do these look like decent numbers?

Stock 2003 evo except TBE ( high flow cat), LICP, Mechanical Boost, Tune, K&N High flow in stock box.

255WHP / 320 WTQ on Mustang Dyno.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 10:34 AM
  #2  
4RETECH's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (86)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 12
From: Orange/Rockland, NY
What?? That's with a tune?? How much boost??
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 10:36 AM
  #3  
newbieEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
If it is a normal low reading Mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
CAD EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Yea, we need to see the boost level to give you any indication of how good those numbers are.

Thats alot of torque for the HP number.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 10:37 AM
  #5  
Donkeypuncher's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Seems low, I dynoed more than that stock. Id be looking for a boost leak. Depends on the dyno also. Did anybody else that used that dyno experience disappointing numbers?

That being said, I did a ton of work to my car and only went to 275. Different dyno also though (DynoJet that reads very low). That was after adding tune, ported mani, TBE, O2, MBC, walboro and new tranny and clutch.

Last edited by Donkeypuncher; Jan 31, 2011 at 10:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 11:08 AM
  #6  
Camrymatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Yea, i have limited experience with that Dyno, but after my car, they tuned a ralliart (2010) and it was stock, and they got 250-260 whp.

Hold the opinions on the TQ number though, i dont have the dyno sheet in front of me, but i recall TQ being over 300.

Peak Boost is set at around 21 i believe.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
J.J4ck0wsk1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Florida / Poland
Yeah boost is low, get an Evo 9 turbo and bov (if you don't have a decent bov already) and go to a different dyno. Should be well in the 335 whp zone with those mods and a 9 turbo if not higher..
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 02:18 PM
  #8  
J.J4ck0wsk1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Florida / Poland
Where did you get dynoed by the way?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 02:26 PM
  #9  
EvoDom's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Joisey Shore
That seems way to low. I would deffinetly go to a different dyno. Keep in mind mustang dyno's read lower than dynojets.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 02:28 PM
  #10  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
only 255whp? sounds like a bad tune since theres more hp to get. what fuel is it? sounds like they dialed in the mid range and nothing uptop.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #11  
Camrymatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Florida
The tune was a TTP dynoed at Central Florida Turbo. The gas was 93.

Maybe their dyno reads lower, i need to find out on "Florida Evo Club".

Looking at the graph Peak HP hits at about 4.5k but i remember hearing that the dyno might be off there.

My TQ is 367 though, that seems awful high even with a margin of error built in. Its up there from 2.5k-3.5k
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 03:58 PM
  #12  
J.J4ck0wsk1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Florida / Poland
Go to AWD Motorsports. Torque seems way too high for hp output. Post up a graph because it doesn't sound like it would look very smooth. Don't want that torque all at once, but to come on smoothly because you'll start breaking things.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 04:04 PM
  #13  
CJ2X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Camrymatic
The tune was a TTP

That's why.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 04:57 PM
  #14  
Camrymatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Florida


Here is the sheet.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 06:37 PM
  #15  
J.J4ck0wsk1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Florida / Poland
I'm no expert, but that graph doesn't look good at all..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:17 AM.