Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

broken crank!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2016, 09:07 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
moyassine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: denver colorado
Posts: 71
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
broken crank!

so cruising down the street oing from 4th to 5th. i press the clutct pedal and really weird knocking/ vibrating noise comes out. pull over and check it. it seemed like tranny. go ack on the highway to go home and sounded like a clutch, get home now it sound like a motor, we pull the tranny out and inspect it and it seems fine clutch seems fine. pull the pan and come to find this. what would cause it, wasnt reving it or anything just cruising. its a 2.4 100mm crank. its from the clutch side.
Attached Thumbnails broken crank!-1934988_578517015633372_5768763719722646966_n.jpg  
Old Jan 2, 2016, 11:56 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
CoachG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Great googly moogly! WTF? Any further info gleaned from the motor autopsy?
Old Jan 2, 2016, 12:44 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
 
Jonno99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,382
Received 68 Likes on 64 Posts
How olds the build and what brand crank?
Old Jan 2, 2016, 03:00 PM
  #4  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,143
Received 153 Likes on 116 Posts
It looks like a torsional fatigue stress fracture originating at the root of the radius between pin and web. It was caused by torsional vibration, and probably started at a stress concentration caused by a piece of slag, or a forging defect, right at the surface of the pin where it meets the web. Unfortunately this happens in the life of Evo!


Time for a rebuild. What are you going for next?
Old Jan 2, 2016, 05:16 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
moyassine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: denver colorado
Posts: 71
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Surprisingly the journal was unharmed. The engine is about 6 month old. The rods were unharmed. So I got a new Manley forged crank and a new set of acl bearings. Gonna send the crank with clutch and it's component's to get balanced togethe . I am keeping the same setup since it didn't harm anything. And go back and shoot for more power.
Old Jan 2, 2016, 05:47 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
njboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of curiosity are the 2.4 cranks forged like the OEM 2.0's? Rarely hear about crank failures on the stock 4G63.
Old Jan 2, 2016, 06:00 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
hutch959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,459
Received 109 Likes on 99 Posts
ive always heard the 4g64 OEM cranks were about 1/2 as strong as the 4G63 cranks.

You got to think... those 4G64 cranks were all in sedans... and in general, slow cars.

The 4G63 cranks were in evo's, which meant the engineers payed a little more attention to the crank strength.
Old Jan 2, 2016, 06:20 PM
  #8  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
moyassine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: denver colorado
Posts: 71
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4g63 cranks are much better than 4g64. But then I'll be 2.1 lt. Instead of 2.4lt
Old Jan 2, 2016, 06:39 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Turndown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 376
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Bad hit! Glad to see nothing else was harmed! Hopefully your new crank will give you some better luck
Old Jan 3, 2016, 12:34 AM
  #10  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,143
Received 153 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by moyassine
4g63 cranks are much better than 4g64. But then I'll be 2.1 lt. Instead of 2.4lt
Dynamically balancing the crank with flywheel and clutch only addresses part of the problem - primary balance. I'm guessing you were running the 4g64 crank without the balance shafts right? If so, consider using a fluidampr crankshaft pulley (http://www.fluidampr.com/product/610701/) in the rebuild to reduce harmonic torsional vibrations that will rapidly fatigue the journal/web next to the flywheel.
Old Jan 3, 2016, 05:20 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
3gturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 571
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
This would be the first 4g64 crank I've seen anyone break What power were you making before it died?
Old Jan 7, 2016, 06:38 PM
  #12  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
moyassine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: denver colorado
Posts: 71
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3gturbo
This would be the first 4g64 crank I've seen anyone break What power were you making before it died?
the car has made 700+ before.
Old Jan 7, 2016, 06:40 PM
  #13  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
moyassine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: denver colorado
Posts: 71
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o
Dynamically balancing the crank with flywheel and clutch only addresses part of the problem - primary balance. I'm guessing you were running the 4g64 crank without the balance shafts right? If so, consider using a fluidampr crankshaft pulley (http://www.fluidampr.com/product/610701/) in the rebuild to reduce harmonic torsional vibrations that will rapidly fatigue the journal/web next to the flywheel.
yea i had no balance shafts. but what bothers is motor ran fine on the old 700 setup. we just refreshened couple things up and threw a smalled turbo and this happened. sucks. but yea the forged crank is here just waiting on the fluidampr
Old Jan 8, 2016, 06:42 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Jmills's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 240
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I was going to ask about whether or not you had balance shafts. Does this mean it's better to keep the balance shafts? Or would a Fluidampr make up for what is lost with balance shafts? Generally curious about it as I'm contemplating a 4g64 build at some point.
Old Jan 8, 2016, 07:42 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
llDemonll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 3,231
Received 99 Likes on 79 Posts
I'm pretty sure English said something about the 100mm cranks being horrible. "Horrible" is a relative term, but they just never had great luck with that. That or I'm completely backwards and the 100mm were perfect. But I'm pretty sure not...


Quick Reply: broken crank!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:28 AM.