Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

What's Faster for highway pulls? 2.0-2.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2019, 06:22 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
kizzlecake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
What's Faster for highway pulls? 2.0-2.4

I am gathering information for what I'd like to build and cannot find solid evidence on what's faster for a 40-140mph highway race. The 2.0 seems to rule the dragstrip but the 150+ wtq seems like it would win out all day with the 2.3/2.4 and a 2.2 seems like the inbetween. Any input is appreciated.👍
Old Apr 22, 2019, 09:21 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evoforstevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 511
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Why street car people don't go with a 2.2 for all their builds is beyond me.
The following users liked this post:
kizzlecake (Apr 22, 2019)
Old Apr 22, 2019, 09:30 AM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
kizzlecake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Leaning heavily towards this actually
Old Apr 22, 2019, 11:36 AM
  #4  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (12)
 
Pal215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,915
Received 345 Likes on 262 Posts
Originally Posted by kizzlecake
I am gathering information for what I'd like to build and cannot find solid evidence on what's faster for a 40-140mph highway race. The 2.0 seems to rule the dragstrip but the 150+ wtq seems like it would win out all day with the 2.3/2.4 and a 2.2 seems like the in between. Any input is appreciated.��
If all you are doing is highway pulls, then I would stay way from the strokers. You're going to want to go destroker because your goal here is to make the maximum amount of power possible at a high RPM, reliably. 2.1 Long Rod Destroker in a 4g64 block (10k + RPM) will give you a better than stock rod ratio and help you make all the power you want. It will just be a laggy bastard on the streets of your town haha. Rev's are what is needed to spool a larger turbo and building a stroker will limit your revs. The extra air volume they intake per stroke doesn't compensate for what high revs will do for a turbo. That being said, you do make more HP and TQ per PSI of boost pressure with the strokers. Again, you will limit RPM with them which would hinder a highway monster. A stroker will still get the job done if you're not running anyone crazy.

Last edited by Pal215; Apr 22, 2019 at 11:43 AM.
The following users liked this post:
kizzlecake (Apr 22, 2019)
Old Apr 22, 2019, 12:08 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
kizzlecake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Thanks for the input, anyone else? Personally, torque moves mass and wins street races. Ever try to drive around a nitrous car? Very hard to beat a properly set up NO2 car 40-140. More twerk than a ghetto claphouse
The following 2 users liked this post by kizzlecake:
Pal215 (Apr 22, 2019), WestPalmEVO (Apr 22, 2019)
Old Apr 22, 2019, 01:32 PM
  #6  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,755
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
I would build a 94mm crank motor, Unless you're going to make over 1k, then stick with stock stroke.

There's no reason to build a 2.1 destroker, the rod ratio isn't needed. Standard rod 2.0 4g's rev past 10 no issue. Though you should really be considering a dry sump past 9500.
The following users liked this post:
kizzlecake (Apr 22, 2019)




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 AM.