Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

What's Faster for highway pulls? 2.0-2.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2019 | 06:22 AM
  #1  
kizzlecake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 2
From: NE Ohio
What's Faster for highway pulls? 2.0-2.4

I am gathering information for what I'd like to build and cannot find solid evidence on what's faster for a 40-140mph highway race. The 2.0 seems to rule the dragstrip but the 150+ wtq seems like it would win out all day with the 2.3/2.4 and a 2.2 seems like the inbetween. Any input is appreciated.👍
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2019 | 09:21 AM
  #2  
evoforstevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
Why street car people don't go with a 2.2 for all their builds is beyond me.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2019 | 09:30 AM
  #3  
kizzlecake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 2
From: NE Ohio
Leaning heavily towards this actually
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2019 | 11:36 AM
  #4  
Pal215's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 361
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by kizzlecake
I am gathering information for what I'd like to build and cannot find solid evidence on what's faster for a 40-140mph highway race. The 2.0 seems to rule the dragstrip but the 150+ wtq seems like it would win out all day with the 2.3/2.4 and a 2.2 seems like the in between. Any input is appreciated.��
If all you are doing is highway pulls, then I would stay way from the strokers. You're going to want to go destroker because your goal here is to make the maximum amount of power possible at a high RPM, reliably. 2.1 Long Rod Destroker in a 4g64 block (10k + RPM) will give you a better than stock rod ratio and help you make all the power you want. It will just be a laggy bastard on the streets of your town haha. Rev's are what is needed to spool a larger turbo and building a stroker will limit your revs. The extra air volume they intake per stroke doesn't compensate for what high revs will do for a turbo. That being said, you do make more HP and TQ per PSI of boost pressure with the strokers. Again, you will limit RPM with them which would hinder a highway monster. A stroker will still get the job done if you're not running anyone crazy.

Last edited by Pal215; Apr 22, 2019 at 11:43 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2019 | 12:08 PM
  #5  
kizzlecake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 2
From: NE Ohio
Thanks for the input, anyone else? Personally, torque moves mass and wins street races. Ever try to drive around a nitrous car? Very hard to beat a properly set up NO2 car 40-140. More twerk than a ghetto claphouse
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2019 | 01:32 PM
  #6  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
I would build a 94mm crank motor, Unless you're going to make over 1k, then stick with stock stroke.

There's no reason to build a 2.1 destroker, the rod ratio isn't needed. Standard rod 2.0 4g's rev past 10 no issue. Though you should really be considering a dry sump past 9500.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:52 AM.