SCC Evo Orgy!
Apr 21, 2004, 06:24 PM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SCC Evo Orgy!
Anyone pick up the new issue of sport compact car? it has the Evo shootout between:
Sparco, RRE, RB Motoring, Vishnu, Works, RMR, XS engineering, toda racing and the EVO RS.
Very interesting results!
DYNO results:
Horsepower
1. RRE - 472
2. Toda - 422
3. Sparco - 399
4. RMR - 376
5. vishnu - 357
6. XS - 356
7. works - 352
8. RB - 279
9. stock RS - 241
Torque
1. RRE - 417
2. Toda - 390
3. XS - 368
4. Sparco - 334
5. RMR - 331
6. Works - 330
7. Vishnu - 319
8. stock RS - 262
9. RB motors - 254
Sparco, RRE, RB Motoring, Vishnu, Works, RMR, XS engineering, toda racing and the EVO RS.
Very interesting results!
DYNO results:
Horsepower
1. RRE - 472
2. Toda - 422
3. Sparco - 399
4. RMR - 376
5. vishnu - 357
6. XS - 356
7. works - 352
8. RB - 279
9. stock RS - 241
Torque
1. RRE - 417
2. Toda - 390
3. XS - 368
4. Sparco - 334
5. RMR - 331
6. Works - 330
7. Vishnu - 319
8. stock RS - 262
9. RB motors - 254
Apr 21, 2004, 06:48 PM
#4
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
car - 1/4 mile/trap speed = 0-60 = lap time
not in order
1. stock RS - 13.3/101.3 = 4.8 = 1:01.5
2. Vishnu - 12.7/112.7 = 3.9 = 1:01.38
3. Works - 12.9/107.9 = 4.6 = 1:00.76
4. RB - 12.9/106.2 = 4.6 = 1:00.79
5. XS - 12.1/112.6 = 3.8 = 59.14
6. Toda - 11.5/117.1 = 3.5 = 59.37
7. RMR - 14.6/89.2 = 6.3 = 59.12
8. RRE - 12.8/104.3 = 4.2 = 59.01
9. Sparco - 11.9/118.3 = 3.7 = 58.08
rmr's clutch was slipping during 1/4 mile and 0-60 testing.
not in order
1. stock RS - 13.3/101.3 = 4.8 = 1:01.5
2. Vishnu - 12.7/112.7 = 3.9 = 1:01.38
3. Works - 12.9/107.9 = 4.6 = 1:00.76
4. RB - 12.9/106.2 = 4.6 = 1:00.79
5. XS - 12.1/112.6 = 3.8 = 59.14
6. Toda - 11.5/117.1 = 3.5 = 59.37
7. RMR - 14.6/89.2 = 6.3 = 59.12
8. RRE - 12.8/104.3 = 4.2 = 59.01
9. Sparco - 11.9/118.3 = 3.7 = 58.08
rmr's clutch was slipping during 1/4 mile and 0-60 testing.
Apr 21, 2004, 06:51 PM
#5
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SirAragorn
car - 1/4 mile/trap speed = 0-60 = lap time
not in order
1. stock RS - 13.3/101.3 = 4.8 = 1:01.5
2. Vishnu - 12.7/112.7 = 3.9 = 1:01.38
3. Works - 12.9/107.9 = 4.6 = 1:00.76
4. RB - 12.9/106.2 = 4.6 = 1:00.79
5. XS - 12.1/112.6 = 3.8 = 59.14
6. Toda - 11.5/117.1 = 3.5 = 59.37
7. RMR - 14.6/89.2 = 6.3 = 59.12
8. RRE - 12.8/104.3 = 4.2 = 59.01
9. Sparco - 11.9/118.3 = 3.7 = 58.08
rmr's clutch was slipping during 1/4 mile and 0-60 testing.
car - 1/4 mile/trap speed = 0-60 = lap time
not in order
1. stock RS - 13.3/101.3 = 4.8 = 1:01.5
2. Vishnu - 12.7/112.7 = 3.9 = 1:01.38
3. Works - 12.9/107.9 = 4.6 = 1:00.76
4. RB - 12.9/106.2 = 4.6 = 1:00.79
5. XS - 12.1/112.6 = 3.8 = 59.14
6. Toda - 11.5/117.1 = 3.5 = 59.37
7. RMR - 14.6/89.2 = 6.3 = 59.12
8. RRE - 12.8/104.3 = 4.2 = 59.01
9. Sparco - 11.9/118.3 = 3.7 = 58.08
rmr's clutch was slipping during 1/4 mile and 0-60 testing.
Apr 21, 2004, 06:58 PM
#6
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, I was looking at the side bars it says 12.7 but in the article it says 12.2. sucks you guys couldn't bring your "real" car. what issues were you having?
Trending Topics
Apr 21, 2004, 07:11 PM
#10
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SirAragorn
ok, I was looking at the side bars it says 12.7 but in the article it says 12.2. sucks you guys couldn't bring your "real" car. what issues were you having?
ok, I was looking at the side bars it says 12.7 but in the article it says 12.2. sucks you guys couldn't bring your "real" car. what issues were you having?
We entered a customer's Stg 1+ car (ez76) for the competition. He was nice enough to let us use it as our back-up car just in case our last-minute slam to get our red shop car (now OTC and One Lap workhorse) ready. The red car did run just before we left for the shootout in LA but there wasn't nearly enough testing time to feel confident with it. I think it would've done well considering what it had done in the past but Shiv is a pretty cautious guy when it comes to things like this. His argument was that it would be better to enter a stock car with a $3500 bolt-on engine package and make good power than enter an EVO with $20,000 of mods everywhere and not perform as well as it could have if it were properly set-up (suspension, tuning, tires, etc,.)
wow. how did RRE make such high numbers and get such mediocre performance #'s?
Last edited by DSMBRETT; Apr 21, 2004 at 07:16 PM.
Apr 21, 2004, 07:18 PM
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by alex_alex
wow. how did RRE make such high numbers and get such mediocre performance #'s?
wow. how did RRE make such high numbers and get such mediocre performance #'s?
Not to mention they also had a faulty Walbro 255 that wouldn't hold consistent fuel pressure, resulting in dyno pulls all over the place.
Last edited by Coolguy949; Apr 21, 2004 at 07:29 PM.
Apr 21, 2004, 07:28 PM
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, i'm thinking about the time attack a week ago at Buttonwillow. I havent read the article yet because you havent scanned it. 
Last edited by Coolguy949; Apr 21, 2004 at 07:30 PM.