Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

SCC Evo Orgy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #1  
SirAragorn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
SCC Evo Orgy!

Anyone pick up the new issue of sport compact car? it has the Evo shootout between:
Sparco, RRE, RB Motoring, Vishnu, Works, RMR, XS engineering, toda racing and the EVO RS.

Very interesting results!
DYNO results:
Horsepower
1. RRE - 472
2. Toda - 422
3. Sparco - 399
4. RMR - 376
5. vishnu - 357
6. XS - 356
7. works - 352
8. RB - 279
9. stock RS - 241

Torque
1. RRE - 417
2. Toda - 390
3. XS - 368
4. Sparco - 334
5. RMR - 331
6. Works - 330
7. Vishnu - 319
8. stock RS - 262
9. RB motors - 254
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #2  
hueman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
mind posting some more from the article?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #3  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
RB Motoring made their evo LOSE torque? how did that happen?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
SirAragorn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
car - 1/4 mile/trap speed = 0-60 = lap time
not in order
1. stock RS - 13.3/101.3 = 4.8 = 1:01.5
2. Vishnu - 12.7/112.7 = 3.9 = 1:01.38
3. Works - 12.9/107.9 = 4.6 = 1:00.76
4. RB - 12.9/106.2 = 4.6 = 1:00.79
5. XS - 12.1/112.6 = 3.8 = 59.14
6. Toda - 11.5/117.1 = 3.5 = 59.37
7. RMR - 14.6/89.2 = 6.3 = 59.12
8. RRE - 12.8/104.3 = 4.2 = 59.01
9. Sparco - 11.9/118.3 = 3.7 = 58.08


rmr's clutch was slipping during 1/4 mile and 0-60 testing.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #5  
DSMBRETT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Petaluma, CA
Originally posted by SirAragorn
car - 1/4 mile/trap speed = 0-60 = lap time
not in order
1. stock RS - 13.3/101.3 = 4.8 = 1:01.5
2. Vishnu - 12.7/112.7 = 3.9 = 1:01.38
3. Works - 12.9/107.9 = 4.6 = 1:00.76
4. RB - 12.9/106.2 = 4.6 = 1:00.79
5. XS - 12.1/112.6 = 3.8 = 59.14
6. Toda - 11.5/117.1 = 3.5 = 59.37
7. RMR - 14.6/89.2 = 6.3 = 59.12
8. RRE - 12.8/104.3 = 4.2 = 59.01
9. Sparco - 11.9/118.3 = 3.7 = 58.08


rmr's clutch was slipping during 1/4 mile and 0-60 testing.
FWIW, our 1/4 mile ET was a 12.2, not a 12.7. Just a stock EVO with a Stage 1+ engine package.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:58 PM
  #6  
SirAragorn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
ok, I was looking at the side bars it says 12.7 but in the article it says 12.2. sucks you guys couldn't bring your "real" car. what issues were you having?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:02 PM
  #7  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
wow. how did RRE make such high numbers and get such mediocre performance #'s?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #8  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
running a big turbo and unlimited boost for one glorious pass on the dyno
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #9  
SirAragorn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
yeah but look at the track time. second best. obviously set up for the track and not 1/4 mile passes.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #10  
DSMBRETT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Petaluma, CA
Originally posted by SirAragorn
ok, I was looking at the side bars it says 12.7 but in the article it says 12.2. sucks you guys couldn't bring your "real" car. what issues were you having?
Really? Ugh.. that sucks. FWIW, our best run was really a 12.1 but it averaged out to a 12.2 when compared to the other runs.

We entered a customer's Stg 1+ car (ez76) for the competition. He was nice enough to let us use it as our back-up car just in case our last-minute slam to get our red shop car (now OTC and One Lap workhorse) ready. The red car did run just before we left for the shootout in LA but there wasn't nearly enough testing time to feel confident with it. I think it would've done well considering what it had done in the past but Shiv is a pretty cautious guy when it comes to things like this. His argument was that it would be better to enter a stock car with a $3500 bolt-on engine package and make good power than enter an EVO with $20,000 of mods everywhere and not perform as well as it could have if it were properly set-up (suspension, tuning, tires, etc,.)

wow. how did RRE make such high numbers and get such mediocre performance #'s?
They had an engine problem after the dyno runs so all their performance figures suffered. The road course test was done the next day with a replacement motor that they managed to get installed overnight

Last edited by DSMBRETT; Apr 21, 2004 at 07:16 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #11  
nabit's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: college station,tx
What month was this in??I want to go pick it up...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #12  
SirAragorn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
it just came out, the June issue. it says Evo Orgy on the cover
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #13  
Coolguy949's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally posted by alex_alex
wow. how did RRE make such high numbers and get such mediocre performance #'s?
Because while everyone else ran hoosiers, they ran toyo proxes RA-1 they have a sponsorship deal for they didnt want to disrupt.

Not to mention they also had a faulty Walbro 255 that wouldn't hold consistent fuel pressure, resulting in dyno pulls all over the place.

Last edited by Coolguy949; Apr 21, 2004 at 07:29 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #14  
SirAragorn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
uhhh no. did you even read the article. hoosiers and kumho's weren't allowed.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #15  
Coolguy949's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Oh, i'm thinking about the time attack a week ago at Buttonwillow. I havent read the article yet because you havent scanned it.

Last edited by Coolguy949; Apr 21, 2004 at 07:30 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:26 AM.