Low to mid 11's

 

ET doesn't mean anything I was asking about the trap speed.

 

376WHP WITH 373WTQ I DID 11.6@117.50
NOW WITH THAT AMOUNT OF POWER I HAVEN'T TRIED IT YET! WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS!..............

 

I think whoever in the ends claims to be the highest it will be on a DynoJet

 

In case no one noticed, this thread is over one and a half years old... brought back from the dead. =x

 

Im sorry I gotta pull this back from the waaaaaaay dead!

Do you feel its possible to put down 400hp on a stock turbo with a built bottom end, MBC, big FMIC, 3in TBE, an ECU flash, and a tune?

 

On race gas, yes. On pump, no. I was at 425/400 with my old tune on a stock 9 turbo (Iknow, not an 8) on E85. That was with a stock exhaust mani, stock intake mani, stock throttle body, and no porting on the turbo. I've since added a buschur ported/coated exhaust mani, custom Intake manifold that is based off of the stock one but is supposed to be comparable to a Wilson V2, perhaps even better , a mil.spec 65mm throttle body, and a ported turbo by mil.spec. I'm not too sure on what the final number will be but they will be up there.

 

Search.

There is like 10 threads on the first page of the dyno section.

 

I know Bryan@GST has tuned a stock turbo car and it has run 11.50's @ 120 mph already.
E-85 on MD dyno made aprox 400whp and 400wtq.

 

ive put down over 430whp and wtq on the stock turbo
not on cbrds dyno tho

 

Dynos are total BS. The only thing they are good for is bragging and setting up your car.

 

someone must have gotten their bubble burst by a dyno lately...

 

2006 Evo IX MR
stock turbo/stock head/stock block(old setup)
366.9 whp/ 362.8 wtq on CBRD mustang dyno

Like I said, good for bragging

 

This thread needs to be locked. Its 4 years old and comparing different dynos is stupid.

 

hows that braggin?
i just put what my car made on cbrd's dyno....
which are very respectable numbers for what litte i actually have done to the car. ask anyone thats been on that dyno

dont be a hater