Notices

GSC Version 2.0 Cam Release!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #16  
Nesiop's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Originally Posted by DCSilvrEvo
What turbo did you use dave?
Dave is running the SlicksMotorSports 35r I believe.
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #17  
evodave's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (546)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,876
Likes: 0
From: driving the 10 second beast in ohio or running lightmods.net
yep its a slickmotorsports gt35r with equal length manifold setup, slickmotorsports intake, downpipe , intercooler piping and intercooler setup also by slickmotorsports....teamed with switzer perf. tuning and these GSC cams...
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #18  
GregGSC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
Originally Posted by mitsuorder
Did you opt for this for a new run of cams just for the hell of it? A cam "revision" concerns me a bit but if it is of purely asthetic value then no worries. What were the reasons for painting the lobes in the first place? Please do not take this as an attack just questions that have come to mind.
just for the hell of it. and it doesn't mater either way performance is exactly the same. the painted cams will wear the paint off the lobs after a few thousand miles and look the same as the new ones do.


Originally Posted by Nesiop
Best looking won't matter except when you open the box to say wow the money I just spent made this look pretty. :-P Shoulda saved the little more money to build to put towards more R&D. And is it the best performing? Better than Tomei and HKS?
yup it is the best performing. look at the dyno graphs ask the people that run them. ask the people that have changed their cams from HKS to ours and don't get any codes.

And no best looking doesn't matter but for $1 per cam I think it was worth it.
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #19  
J8dailo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town
how much they going for?
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #20  
GregGSC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
$499 shipped
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #21  
LpBevoEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Are there any before (hks) after (gsc) dyno sheets? Im interested in seeing this power increase from your cams over the competition.
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #22  
GregGSC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
I don't have any dyno's from before and after the exact same duration i have some of the 264s compaired to our 272/264.


Anyone feel like doing a cam test? HKS vs GSC vs Buddy Club vs Tomie vs Jun vs Comp?

Last edited by GregGSC; Jun 14, 2005 at 09:18 PM.
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #23  
GGEVO2k5MR's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
ill do one for sure....who is supplying the cams haha....so greg you said 3 weeks you will have the 272/272 set in ?? count me in if so
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 01:55 AM
  #24  
Scoot's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by evodave
I LOVE my GSC (version 1) cams...272 /264 setup is killer ( i am sure all of the combos are). Way better then my 264/272 or 272/272 hks cam setups i have used before. I made 489 awhp on 93 octane and 50/50 alky /water injection at only 25 psi so these cams definitely deliver the goods!
Thanks again GREG and GSC !
Quick question for you guys, what is the difference in terms of hp, idle and power curve between a 272i/264e setup and a 264i/272e setup. I'm considering a cam upgrade but am having difficulty finding out the pros and cons of each setup. Little help here please.
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 06:22 AM
  #25  
fsugatorbait's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
From: CT
Looks good, hope to be doing business with you soon.
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 06:30 AM
  #26  
rgonyer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Blue Grass, Iowa
Originally Posted by Scoot
Quick question for you guys, what is the difference in terms of hp, idle and power curve between a 272i/264e setup and a 264i/272e setup. I'm considering a cam upgrade but am having difficulty finding out the pros and cons of each setup. Little help here please.
I second this question. Done a bit of searching, but didn't see it summarized anywhere.
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 06:57 AM
  #27  
nhsean69's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Originally Posted by rgonyer
I second this question. Done a bit of searching, but didn't see it summarized anywhere.
i third this......im really leaning to the GSC's i love the price, look, and good reviews ive been reading. But im so confused on a setup to go with.
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 06:57 AM
  #28  
GregGSC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
272/264 cams on a mystang dyno
HKS RS Intake w/K&N cone filter
AMS U/LICP
GSC cams (272i/264e)
TBE (mixed)
Greddy EBC @ 21 psi
650 cc injectors and Walbro 255
TurboTrix Flash



GSC 264in/272ex cams
HKS RS Intake
RSR Turboback
UR High-Flow Cat
HKS Downpipe
Walbro 255lph
ARP Headstuds
Hallman Evo MBC (22 psi settling to 21psi at redline)
Greddy Type S BOV
Custom Dynoflash Tune



The 272/272's are shipping. actually everything is shipping. If we don't have it here either Logic or EVOMoto or Lancer Shop have them..
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #29  
Nesiop's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Basically those two have almost same mods except the Mustang dyno has more hp and yet reads lower. Is it that the 272 intake 264 exhaust gets more hp than the 264 intake 272 exhaust? Well that and the fact that TT tuned one, and al tuned the other and TT does it a bit leaner.

But I would think on the lower reading dyno it woulda broke even then. Unless it is a cat delete pipe on the first TBE. and that the UICP and LICP makes that big of a difference.
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #30  
GregGSC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
One thing you need to remember is that, these numbers are from two different cars, in two different states and with two different types of dynos. So it’s kind of hard to compare them and decide what would be the better one to go with. The mods are similar but the tuners are different so it’s even harder to compare them. The 264/272 does peak more torque but falls off and the 272/264 has a flatter torque curve. If you try to estimate what the 1psi of boost would do for torque in the mid range I think you can see it in the graph. The reason I like the 272/264 is because it made more power and the tq didn't fall off as much and it’s flatter.

This is defiantly a tough one to decide on. What really matters is what type of turbo your running stock or upgraded as to which combo you want to run.

Greg



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 PM.