Official "STANCED" Evo Thread
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: snohomish
and don't take the picture of my car as a reference that's the day I bought it
from fender to tire? yea your fine man run like 12k 10k spring rates and you can run closer to the tire than you think as long as the front wheels can turn without serious rubbing than yea your fine you can get a really aggressive and clean look with out taking away the function just do your research on wheel and tire specs typically I would run a 18x9.5 +18 to +22 on a evo 8-9 +10 to +12 your gunna start messing with camber and more stretch and to make that look good you need to be slammed otherwise your lookin mexi correct me if im wrong but that's my opinion for you
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: snohomish
I currently run a rpf1 in 17x9.5+38 on 255 tires. I honestly can't stand most of the stance scene but I also hate stock looking Evos gap wise. I'm currently running about a fingers gap and a half from fender to tire, I have my car setup more for function. But I appreciate well done Evos, just not over the top. As far as handling I was referring more to the fact that the roll center gets changed.
with that setup what I would do is buy some BAD *** tires nt01's or r888's or falken azenis and imo f "fitment" or "stance" sure if you like the "low" look then you can still be low but mount some bad *** tires don't stretch just lower your evo a bit and show off your tires and wheels. it would benefit both worlds function and form
and you can always do extended studs and put some spacers on to get it perfect you don't need to be a mm from your tire to be "stanced or fitted" you just got to be creative
