View Poll Results: Which Suspension Setup?...DMS 50 - Ohlins RT - ??????
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll
Ohlins or DMS 50
DMS 50's BETTER street ride AND blazing fast at the track....a time to shoot for Stock turbo Buschur Stage 4 with stage 3 head 280's EMS, 390 dynojet WHP Willow springs International Raceway A a NASA TT event...1:29.2XX. other Evos and DSM's are there but are all big turbo cars.
Originally Posted by chmodlf
. . .
Personally I am having a hard time deciding on my setup. I go back and forth between dedicated autox, autox/daily driver, the costs, etc.
I was drawn to this thread originally because of the postitive comments about the racing and non-racing characteristics.
Some people claim that it is impossible to combine true race setup with daily driving. Makes sense, but I and many of us live in this context.
Personally I am having a hard time deciding on my setup. I go back and forth between dedicated autox, autox/daily driver, the costs, etc.
I was drawn to this thread originally because of the postitive comments about the racing and non-racing characteristics.
Some people claim that it is impossible to combine true race setup with daily driving. Makes sense, but I and many of us live in this context.
I've never experienced any other high-performance racing suspension, but I guess I always thought that if it handled well on the track it would do so on the streets too. Is this not always the case?
EVOlutionary
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
Just FYI, I daily drive (in the summer) on full on national level autocross suspension setup. With street tires rather than R-compounds mind you, but I still put on 36,000 miles last year! I say it is far from impossible to have both, but personally I want my car to handle like a race car on the street not like a cadillac.
I've never experienced any other high-performance racing suspension, but I guess I always thought that if it handled well on the track it would do so on the streets too. Is this not always the case?
EVOlutionary
I've never experienced any other high-performance racing suspension, but I guess I always thought that if it handled well on the track it would do so on the streets too. Is this not always the case?
EVOlutionary
Originally Posted by markdaddio
Sorry, but I disagree. Michael Schumacher, and Gilles Villenueve come to mind as two pretty decent road racers who prefer a tick of mid corner oversteer to allow them to get on the throttle a little earlier than their competition. But what really separates those guys from others is their ability get into the corner quicker, rotate, and get out quicker. It is just that it is very difficult to do, and most people just can't pull it off on a consistant basis. I am sure that most racers have felt the effects of this a time or two, it is called having the car on the ragged edge. If it were easy to be really fast, everyone would be much closer than they are. Additionally, I have been exposed to a very obvious attitude that if someone is faster than they are that it obviously is the car. That is more prevelent in road racing because it is rare to have someone else drive your car. In auto-x, just put a fast driver in your car and see what happens. Sorry for the ramble.
Mark
Mark
Long story short-he beat me by 2/100 in my own car. It is the best indication that my best mod will be seat time. I know I need coilovers and bigger tires to compete in SM, but I truly believe that driver behavior will be the biggest factor in reducing times IMO.
Why not just buy mine....see for yourself. Custom built Ohlins, by the same shop that preps our ALMS cars... I have a ton of $$ into this setup, so who ever buys it is getting a great deal! https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=184503
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
Just FYI, I daily drive (in the summer) on full on national level autocross suspension setup. With street tires rather than R-compounds mind you, but I still put on 36,000 miles last year! I say it is far from impossible to have both, but personally I want my car to handle like a race car on the street not like a cadillac.
I've never experienced any other high-performance racing suspension, but I guess I always thought that if it handled well on the track it would do so on the streets too. Is this not always the case?
EVOlutionary
I've never experienced any other high-performance racing suspension, but I guess I always thought that if it handled well on the track it would do so on the streets too. Is this not always the case?
EVOlutionary
What I am talking about is if I spend $3k+ on a suspension and I am mostly driving to work on crappy roads, I am going to be really pissed if the ride is MORE uncomfortable than the severly overdamped stock setup. I like to do some spirited riding on the streets where a race-like setup is great. I can live with a stiff suspension provided that it is the same or better than stock.
I am encouraged by chronohunter's post that it blends the two worlds without being a large compromise at either end of the spectrum. It makes me more easily want to part with the $875 or whatever it will be a corner!
BTW -- are Ohlin having their products made in China, Taiwan or somewhere else? Shiv keeps alluding to the change in supply side. If not what is the poop? Everyone is saying that nobody has any Ohlin product.
Something to consider about inside wheel spin due to less traction....
You can dial a lot of this out by increasing your droop height on the rear shocks.... this is a common problem I see with shorter length struts. Most people try to compensate by ONE of the following, either a larger rear anti-roll bar, or stiffer springs. It is not the source of the trouble though. This will only mask the issue.
Do an experiment, add a 10 or 15mm spacer to the top of the strut, see what happens.
DMS actually sells droop tuning kits to help out with this for autocrossers.
-mark
You can dial a lot of this out by increasing your droop height on the rear shocks.... this is a common problem I see with shorter length struts. Most people try to compensate by ONE of the following, either a larger rear anti-roll bar, or stiffer springs. It is not the source of the trouble though. This will only mask the issue.
Do an experiment, add a 10 or 15mm spacer to the top of the strut, see what happens.
DMS actually sells droop tuning kits to help out with this for autocrossers.
-mark
Originally Posted by DMS_Mark
Something to consider about inside wheel spin due to less traction....
You can dial a lot of this out by increasing your droop height on the rear shocks.... this is a common problem I see with shorter length struts. Most people try to compensate by ONE of the following, either a larger rear anti-roll bar, or stiffer springs. It is not the source of the trouble though. This will only mask the issue.
Do an experiment, add a 10 or 15mm spacer to the top of the strut, see what happens.
DMS actually sells droop tuning kits to help out with this for autocrossers.
-mark
You can dial a lot of this out by increasing your droop height on the rear shocks.... this is a common problem I see with shorter length struts. Most people try to compensate by ONE of the following, either a larger rear anti-roll bar, or stiffer springs. It is not the source of the trouble though. This will only mask the issue.
Do an experiment, add a 10 or 15mm spacer to the top of the strut, see what happens.
DMS actually sells droop tuning kits to help out with this for autocrossers.
-mark
In these shocks they use anywhere from 2-4 different springs (triple rate, quad rate, etc.) on each shock, with one of them being quite a bit softer than the others. This allows the shocks to be 1/3 - 1/2 of the way into the shock travel under no load conditions (at optimal ride-height). But when you go over a depression in the ground or get alot of lean in a corner, the helper spring pushes the tire down to keep in contact with the trail giving you better handling and more traction. If you just used a single short spring to get the proper ride height it would not be able to push the wheel down under these conditions because it can only extend so far. Does this make any sense?
If you can picture this - at rest my quad sat with the frame about 6" off the ground. I could stand in front of it and lift the front end about 6" and the tires would still be touching the ground.
So, does anyone dual or triple rate springs on their cars??
EVOlutionary
DMS springs are a duel taper barrel wound tripple progressive spring (I think the biggest advantage) My car has 6" of total rear travel and 4.5 in the front end...WAY MORE than stock..look at post by David Buschur when I set his car up for the C&D event he couldn't understand how the car road better with the racing set-up than stock...how? ..DMS thats how.
Last edited by robi; Mar 8, 2006 at 07:39 PM.
Sorry to correct here Robi,
DMS makes 3 different winds of springs. All of our springs are what we desginate dual rate springs. The KST type is a very smooth transition (compared to the rest of our springs) and is used on setups like HONDAS, or very, very fast tracks. Hard to control for low speed turning though.
The MG springs are the most flexible. They have the dual rate at both ends of the spring, but have essentially 3 steps in the their progression. The DP springs are hard to setup ride heights, but are like the MG. We use these primarily for street cars or cars were we need the most low speed traction / control.
All of our springs were designed to work with our valving. Recently however I have had possitive feedback from people using them with different shocks. I thought it was pretty cool actually !
-mark
DMS makes 3 different winds of springs. All of our springs are what we desginate dual rate springs. The KST type is a very smooth transition (compared to the rest of our springs) and is used on setups like HONDAS, or very, very fast tracks. Hard to control for low speed turning though.
The MG springs are the most flexible. They have the dual rate at both ends of the spring, but have essentially 3 steps in the their progression. The DP springs are hard to setup ride heights, but are like the MG. We use these primarily for street cars or cars were we need the most low speed traction / control.
All of our springs were designed to work with our valving. Recently however I have had possitive feedback from people using them with different shocks. I thought it was pretty cool actually !
-mark
"whatever" lol the top progressive portion of my springs at ride hight is "coil bound out" like a helper spring on a straight rate spring the bottem progressive portion isn't. so even if not so designed they work like a tripple rate spring...;-).
Funny that you say that, It's been said that Rubins is going through a team ordered left foot learning curve in his Works Honda this season. It'll be nice to see him win one for Honda ...before Button does.
Originally Posted by chmodlf
Keep on rambling Mark. We are listening. 
Too bad Rubens Barrichello doesn't left foot brake more. He could have been closer to Schumacher. LOL I know that that is only part of the story.

Too bad Rubens Barrichello doesn't left foot brake more. He could have been closer to Schumacher. LOL I know that that is only part of the story.
Perhaps this may give you some insight on Ohlins design:
http://www.ohlins.com/pdf/07255-01.pdf
http://www.ohlins.com/pdf/07255-01.pdf
Originally Posted by evoracerx
I'm trying to educate myself. If I have 5 choices to pick from, I want to know why I should go to them. I also want to know what the affects are when say you add one shim on the dampening of the shock, so that I understand what is going on my car and the handling characteristics. for example, there are tuners that can tune a car to 500 hp, though it drives like ***, doesn't idle, stalls and they forgot to turn knock control off when they were tuning the timing (I was AEM trained and saw this on some frinds cars).
Maybe someone can direct me to a website or person that can better explain, on the Ohlins suspension, how different modifications of the internals will affect the damening characteristics. Or would some one be able to explain this as a separate thread? I think this would be very educational to many on this board, not too many educational things around here.
Thanks
Maybe someone can direct me to a website or person that can better explain, on the Ohlins suspension, how different modifications of the internals will affect the damening characteristics. Or would some one be able to explain this as a separate thread? I think this would be very educational to many on this board, not too many educational things around here.
Thanks
I haven't used Ohlins so I can't give any first hand feedback on them. I've heard wonderful things from rally guys about the more expensive Ohlins, but they're in a whole other ballpark in price.
Those of you who've been on our website have seen the WRX 4 feet in the air on the opening page, so you know how I drive. I've killed stock struts by blowing the damping units and by bending the housings like pudding.
The new shop car has DMS 50's in it. It's been hammered on for years without any issues. I have to agree that these coilovers are almost bombproof. I've proven it time and time again. I have lots of bent wheels, but no bent DMS struts.
I drove the car daily all last summer and I love the way it rides too. It's certainly not for everyone, but most people don't mind stiff as long as it's not bouncy, which my DMS are not.
For the record I've never sold either brand so I have no reason to try and sway anyone's opinion. I'm happy with my choice of the DMS 50's because I know I can drive the car any way I want and count on my equipment to take the abuse.
-Mike
Originally Posted by chrisw
If you have the money to spend, buy the DMS 50s. I prefer them only because they have an independant rebound and dampening control. DMS struts are bullet proof and can handle anything that you can do without crashing the car.
The new shop car has DMS 50's in it. It's been hammered on for years without any issues. I have to agree that these coilovers are almost bombproof. I've proven it time and time again. I have lots of bent wheels, but no bent DMS struts.

I drove the car daily all last summer and I love the way it rides too. It's certainly not for everyone, but most people don't mind stiff as long as it's not bouncy, which my DMS are not.
For the record I've never sold either brand so I have no reason to try and sway anyone's opinion. I'm happy with my choice of the DMS 50's because I know I can drive the car any way I want and count on my equipment to take the abuse.
-Mike











