Best bang for the buck tire
#21
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately not many people have tested these tires against one another in the wet. Tire Rack is the only source that routinely does wet tests. Everyone else seems to run from the water.
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
This is a review I just googled really quick. The other I had read was a evo track review. The word is they're surprisingly good in the wet though which is good for me.
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...est/index.html
On the way to Florida, we found ourselves in a deluge from Richmond, Virginia, to the Florida border. We were not expecting the NT05s to channel water the way they did. Their performance in the wet was a quantum leap beyond what we've come to expect from the 555s. Even at speeds approaching 90 mph, the car was glued to the road (no, we don't recommend this at home). The Cobra went through standing water practically unaffected. The only thing that slowed us down was the fact that it got to the point where the wipers could not keep up. We would have never attempted such speeds with the 555s.
#26
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NW suburbs
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have been on the XS for a few months now. not a bad street tires, not bad in the wet (probably not as good as the Z1's). i bought them instead of the Z1's because i got a deal on them. i have autoXed 3 times on them. takes a while to get warmed up, the first event i went to was early in the season and it was like 65* out. my rear tires were always cold when i got off track. tires are much better in 90* events.
not a bad tire, but i wish i had gone with either the NT05 or the Z1. they are also a thin 255 compared to the Z1.
not a bad tire, but i wish i had gone with either the NT05 or the Z1. they are also a thin 255 compared to the Z1.
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: FLA-HI-SoCal
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've used the NT-05 throughout the past year and a half extensively for track use only and I have to say I really enjoy the tire. Given the extreme camber our cars love so much results in odd wear in the tire due to the grand canyon grooving. But they can last (2) entire weekends before flipping them and then another (2)day track weekend, totaling (4) heavy track days...
I'm testing out the Federal 595RS-r at the moment and the current size they had available for me was a 235/45/17 tire. The odd thing was that the width of the 235/45 595RS-r was just as wide as my 255/40 Nitto NT-05. I autocrossed them, non-competitively, last weekend at the MitsubishiSuperStore/SocalEvo.net meet on a fairly large autocross track... The fastest guy was on Hankook r-comps running in the 74second range (not to mention an avid auto-x'r), with me right behind him in the 75second range (not so avid auto-x'r)... I was really trying to figure out the tire pressure in the Federals and it came out to be in the low 30's, 32psi hot to be exact. I kept the rear at 40psi to help the car oversteer a lil, but it just would happen at all... The Nittos love pressure and I would cruise them at 38-40psi depending on how the track is/was... The 595rs-r had huge stopping power with rabestos st-43 pads and come with pretty stiff sidewalls with low TP and the squish technique (lol), being the end test result. I did start to experience roll over at 30psi...
Now this was far from a true tire test and I am by no means an autocrosser, so I will give a full write in my environment on the Federals when I receive them in my proper tires size of the 255/40/17 and put them on a real track, such as Buttonwillow, Big Willow, Cal Speedway or the like... but I am having high hopes for the Federal 595RS-R...
-Matt
I'm testing out the Federal 595RS-r at the moment and the current size they had available for me was a 235/45/17 tire. The odd thing was that the width of the 235/45 595RS-r was just as wide as my 255/40 Nitto NT-05. I autocrossed them, non-competitively, last weekend at the MitsubishiSuperStore/SocalEvo.net meet on a fairly large autocross track... The fastest guy was on Hankook r-comps running in the 74second range (not to mention an avid auto-x'r), with me right behind him in the 75second range (not so avid auto-x'r)... I was really trying to figure out the tire pressure in the Federals and it came out to be in the low 30's, 32psi hot to be exact. I kept the rear at 40psi to help the car oversteer a lil, but it just would happen at all... The Nittos love pressure and I would cruise them at 38-40psi depending on how the track is/was... The 595rs-r had huge stopping power with rabestos st-43 pads and come with pretty stiff sidewalls with low TP and the squish technique (lol), being the end test result. I did start to experience roll over at 30psi...
Now this was far from a true tire test and I am by no means an autocrosser, so I will give a full write in my environment on the Federals when I receive them in my proper tires size of the 255/40/17 and put them on a real track, such as Buttonwillow, Big Willow, Cal Speedway or the like... but I am having high hopes for the Federal 595RS-R...
-Matt
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Thanks Matt! It's great that you shared your review. I saw a review on the older model 595rs and that was as good as the older Falken rt-615. It's great to know that their are other tires out there other than the popular ones.
Dyezak Why didn't you include the Hankook Ventus R-S3?
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....22XL&tab=Sizes
Dyezak Why didn't you include the Hankook Ventus R-S3?
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....22XL&tab=Sizes