Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

AMS EVO X makes 450whp on pump GAS!! Using our prototype 35R kit!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #106  
UT_EvoX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: SL, UT
Originally Posted by murlo26
I think the cast one will work awesome up until the huge turbo kits, so if you aren't planning on 800whp+, the cast one should work pretty well i think.
Please explain your logic... if anything, the cast manifold has a greater ability to support more power/heat. Tubular = weaker. AMS are running their GT850R on this very cast manifold. I understand that it's not a T04 flange setup, but it should support well over 800 WHP.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #107  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by UT_EvoX
Please explain your logic... if anything, the cast manifold has a greater ability to support more power/heat. Tubular = weaker. AMS are running their GT850R on this very cast manifold. I understand that it's not a T04 flange setup, but it should support well over 800 WHP.
I guess I was thinking physical size. That is why the K series had the sidewinder manifold. I agree the cast is the way to go, but physically fitting a huge *** turbo, I would think you would have to shift the thing over to fit it physically.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #108  
UT_EvoX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: SL, UT
Originally Posted by murlo26
I guess I was thinking physical size. That is why the K series had the sidewinder manifold. I agree the cast is the way to go, but physically fitting a huge *** turbo, I would think you would have to shift the thing over to fit it physically.
Definitely agreed, but I think AMS' GT950R would fit in there just fine
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:47 PM
  #109  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by UT_EvoX
Definitely agreed, but I think AMS' GT950R would fit in there just fine
I am not sure, I know on the K series it would definitely not fit, lol.

With exhaust side on the rear for 4 cylinder motors space is always an issue, well has been in the past.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #110  
UT_EvoX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: SL, UT
Originally Posted by murlo26
I am not sure, I know on the K series it would definitely not fit, lol.

With exhaust side on the rear for 4 cylinder motors space is always an issue, well has been in the past.
I can't tell if the GT950R has a GT35R-style compressor cover or a GT4088R-style cover... if it's like the GT850R, it should fit. I've never seen one in person, so I don't know.

But a side-mount, front-facing manifold would be something I'd want to buy if I ever go with a non-stock-frame turbo
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 05:47 AM
  #111  
cpunlamd's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by UT_EvoX
But a side-mount, front-facing manifold would be something I'd want to buy if I ever go with a non-stock-frame turbo
Agreed. Why try to cram a larger turbo in a tight space, when moving it a little will makes more sense.
[IMG][/IMG]
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 06:17 AM
  #112  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
If you aren't forced to use the stock location of the turbo there is quite a bit of space behind our engines to mount all but the largest turbo setups back there. The sidewinder setup doesn't look bad but I would imagine you would need to fab up some beefy brackets to hold a turbo out at that location. The clearance between the cooling system and ECU looks somewhat tight and having the exhaust side of the turbo (which can get glowing orange) right in front of the fuel and brake lines doesn't really sit well with me.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #113  
Evo VIII 4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Allentown PA
which sidewinder kit is that, and how much would that cost to make???
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 11:17 PM
  #114  
MarkL's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Not bad.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #115  
Evo VIII 4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Allentown PA
is that turbotrix kit
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #116  
cpunlamd's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Evo VIII 4G63
is that turbotrix kit
I dont think its a "kit", but it was fabbed by turbotrix.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 06:00 PM
  #117  
GGevoXftmfw's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Bartlett, IL (chicago)
gimmie turbo kit
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2010 | 01:00 PM
  #118  
cnj4ever's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
that is definetely TurboTrix and I would think that is not meant to truly be street driven. Just my .02
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 04:50 AM
  #119  
Peter10654's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Germany
A casting turbo is always more reliable than a normal pipe welded manifold. Why does no manufacture built his cars with pipe welded manifolds? All manufacture does it with casting manifolds... Cast manifolds hold 100.000 of miles.

If the casting material is good I would prefer always a cast manifold !!

The way AMS did the construction is the best you can go @ the moment. A round V-Band solution on the manifold with connection the turbos carries the most air and best spooling.

That's also the reason TIAL brought the round V-Band exhaust housings to the GT-R Serie.

I'd take always the here showed AMS manifold. I'd just use another turbo !!

AMS------ GOOD JOB !!

Peter
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 06:58 PM
  #120  
Evo a Mula's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
From: bayshore ny
Originally Posted by Hiboost
If you aren't forced to use the stock location of the turbo there is quite a bit of space behind our engines to mount all but the largest turbo setups back there. The sidewinder setup doesn't look bad but I would imagine you would need to fab up some beefy brackets to hold a turbo out at that location. The clearance between the cooling system and ECU looks somewhat tight and having the exhaust side of the turbo (which can get glowing orange) right in front of the fuel and brake lines doesn't really sit well with me.
very true but you dont have to move things around as much as you think

Originally Posted by Evo VIII 4G63
which sidewinder kit is that, and how much would that cost to make???
whole kit is around 5 grand i was told

Originally Posted by Evo VIII 4G63
is that turbotrix kit
yess it is
Originally Posted by cnj4ever
that is definetely TurboTrix and I would think that is not meant to truly be street driven. Just my .02
not true...honda k series turbo kits used side winders and they work in DD just fine
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 AM.