Agile Auto Performance - Cobb AP Tune

Subscribe
Jun 8, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #16  
Honestly I could care less about the final numbers, whose dyno reads high, who's dyno reads low, or any of this other non sense. Getting your car tuned is about just that, the tune. When my car base lined it was running 10 to 1 a/f and struggling to make 15psi at redline. After the tune it feels like a completely different car. Not only is there more peak power and torque but the power band itself is MUCH broader and smoother. Even the everyday drivability of the car was drastically improved.

Again, getting your car tuned is about a lot more then just peak numbers. Hill and everyone at Agile understand that and that's what makes him a great tuner. That and a dyno that reads high
Reply 0
Jun 8, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #17  
1 for now..

Reply 0
Jun 9, 2009 | 12:02 PM
  #18  
What the F? You changed you avatar and made me edit my original super funny post!

Seriously, way to go Al. It's tough to see through the BS of peak number dyno chart tent pitchin' contest. Your powerband is smooth and wide, the TQ falls off, but what can you expect from a 2 liter, right . It's good to know the guys at Agile are on point.

Too bad you couldn't get that tune while I was in town . I'm sure your car is still slow and you suck at driving anyway . SIKE!

Now get some good tires and tear up Rt 9! Better yet, go get some track time!

Oh yea...What up AlxSTI! I see you holdin' it down for big Al. That's what's up!
Reply 0
Jun 9, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #19  
Quote: Right above this post is an Iveytune thread where the car had similar mods to yours and baselined 311 - so maybe agiles dyno isn't too far off?
I've had similar results - Agile's Dynapack reads a tad lower than a DynoJet
Reply 0
Jun 10, 2009 | 12:27 AM
  #20  
Quote: I've had similar results - Agile's Dynapack reads a tad lower than a DynoJet

All the graphs they have on their wall mostly show STI's with stock whp numbers around stock crank numbers. Turboxs' dynapak for example, reads now where near this high.
Reply 0
Jun 10, 2009 | 07:33 AM
  #21  
Quote: All the graphs they have on their wall mostly show STI's with stock whp numbers around stock crank numbers. Turboxs' dynapak for example, reads now where near this high.
I don't think so... my stock STI put down 240whp on their dyno, 300 crank hp rated by Subaru - given a 20% drive train loss would make their dyno VERY accurate.

Now there are certainly other brand dynos that read lower and higher, you're beating a dead horse here - but the point of a dyno is to aid as a tuning tool... When it comes to steady state tuning and repeatability, the Dynapack is one of the best!
Reply 0
Jun 11, 2009 | 06:26 AM
  #22  
Al.. what happened to the avatar? it went from some super cool ***** to some wack keys..
Reply 0
Jun 11, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #23  
wow 309 whp baseline?

you should come dyno at All ASpects where my baseline was 240whp.... and see what you get.

my modded baseline before a tune with cooler, exhaust, intake ect was 270 whp... so i bet they are showing from 20-30whp higher then my local dynojet.

edit : or we can just run
Reply 0
Jun 11, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #24  
309 whp baseline was with all of his mods minus the tune. I don't think the dyno reads as high as you guys are suspecting. More than say a mustang dyno, sure, but not crazy high.
Reply 0
Jun 11, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #25  
Quote: What the F? You changed you avatar and made me edit my original super funny post!
Quote: Al.. what happened to the avatar? it went from some super cool ***** to some wack keys..
I was told I had to change my avatar. Apparently this is a family website and Vicky wearing a t shirt is offensive. . . Or something like that.

Quote: edit : or we can just run


Quote: 309 whp baseline was with all of his mods minus the tune. I don't think the dyno reads as high as you guys are suspecting. More than say a mustang dyno, sure, but not crazy high.
Correct. The 309whp dyno number was with mods - no tuning.
Reply 0
Subscribe