Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Dom2 + E85 + BlaqOps = 452whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2009, 10:32 PM
  #1  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dom2 + E85 + BlaqOps = 452whp

This customer ran out of single pump the last time he was in the shop. I am finding out the Evo 10's seem to run out of single pumps much sooner than the 8/9's.

Anyway. Thanks to BlaqOps, there is now a progressive (non-hobbs switch) Evo 10 double pumper in the car. It almost ended up working too well as the AFR's went from 12.4 AFR (with the single pump @ 50 base) to 9.6 AFR @ 50base with no other changes than the BlaqOps double pumper system! Guess it works!

2008 Evo 10 GSR

Mods:

Ultimate racing downpipe with integrated 02 housing
Ultimate racing test pipe
Perrin dual tip catback
DW 1000cc injectors
FuelLab Adjustable FPR
Boomba fuel rail
Aeromotive inline fuel filter
BlaqOps Progressive double pumper fuel system
AMS FMIC
AEM intake
Nisei Intercooler piping
Perrin 3port boost solenoid
Forge wastegate actuator
Blouch Dominator 2 turbo
GST Motorsports tune (using EcuFlash)
E85

Stock cams

452whp / 352wtq


29 psi to 6800, then tapering to 27.5@ 7500rpm

For reference a stock 10 puts down approx 22X whp on our dyno and this Evo put down 380 whp with the stock turbo on E85 and 320 whp on 91 oct with the stock turbo.



This same car on the stock Evo 10 turbo on E85 vs it now on the Dom2:


Last edited by GST Motorsports; Nov 15, 2009 at 10:36 PM.
Old Nov 16, 2009, 05:56 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There we go, I have been waiting for these results

Congrats on the numbers, 450whp on that dyno is very solid.

So it sounds like the Blaqops worked out pretty well, I have been talking with the owner about it and am leaning towards getting it for when I throw my red in. Any tuning difficulties? This is the MAF based one right? I guess my main concern is safety/reliability, what are your thoughts on the system? I would just love to get a little more insight from a third party, because most of the local tuners to me suggested just using the hobb switch one. WOuld you say this is better than the hobb switch system?

Thanks for any info and if this is off topic, I am sorry, I PM'ed you and didnt get anything. You can take this to PM if you want, but i think a mini review on the blaqops would be sweet.
Old Nov 16, 2009, 06:07 AM
  #3  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
450whp from a dom2 damn. Me likey! Look at the gains over 5500 they're insane! Interesting that the peak torque didn't go up like it does on the stock frame evo8/9 turbos, all of the gains are up top.

Nice work!
Old Nov 16, 2009, 07:05 AM
  #4  
Newbie
 
t12ung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The car feels great thank you once again Bryan. I would also recommend the BlaqOps kit to anyone. The car feels so smooth with it because it's a progressively controlled so you don't have the second pump turning on at max right away.
Old Nov 16, 2009, 07:09 AM
  #5  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
unowned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
time to up the rev limit!
Old Nov 16, 2009, 08:31 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am guessing peak power won't change much if you rev it more, the torque looked to be falling off at peak rpm quite a bit and same with power up top. Maybe a little more could be made with just revs, but I think Cams would be a better choice
Old Nov 16, 2009, 10:39 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
t12ung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I might out cams next but I can't decide between the Cosworth MX1 or the Kelford 214B. I think I'm going to research it a little bit more and make a decision early next year.
Old Nov 16, 2009, 02:56 PM
  #8  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JaxRRevoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice #s.....blouch FTW....
Old Nov 17, 2009, 12:52 PM
  #9  
Newbie
 
Sleek2G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very nice numbers concidering they are simple bolt-ons and an awesome tune (e-85).

BTW E-85 FTMFW
Old Nov 17, 2009, 01:49 PM
  #10  
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Noize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 8,849
Received 135 Likes on 81 Posts
//fixed
Old Nov 17, 2009, 02:06 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Noize
//fixed
I think the actual customer of this car was in here and actually interested in some of that info.
Old Nov 17, 2009, 02:24 PM
  #12  
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Noize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 8,849
Received 135 Likes on 81 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
I think the actual customer of this car was in here and actually interested in some of that info.
Well, the vendor that started the thread asked I separate them. The posts are still intact, they are in a new thread of their own in this same forum.
Old Nov 17, 2009, 02:36 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Noize
Well, the vendor that started the thread asked I separate them. The posts are still intact, they are in a new thread of their own in this same forum.
Nah, thats cool, I agree the huge amount of other vendor dyno graphs should have gotten moved, that was excessive.

I was more referring to the cam discussion, which is partly in here now i think.

Regardless, nice work GST!
Old Nov 17, 2009, 02:46 PM
  #14  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
DG Motors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry if you thought I was Hi-jacking Bryan. Never intended to! To the customer, enjoy your power, that is one of sickest power bands, curves I have seen to date on that turbo.

Last edited by DG Motors; Nov 17, 2009 at 03:07 PM.
Old Nov 17, 2009, 02:59 PM
  #15  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DG Motors
Sorry if you thought I was Hi-jacking Brian. Never intended to! To the customer, enjoy your power, that is one of sickest power bands, curves I have seen to date on that turbo.
No problem. I'm all for sharing info, but I just think different vendor/dyno plots in another vendor/dyno plots thread like that can be a recipe for confusion.

- Bryan


Quick Reply: Dom2 + E85 + BlaqOps = 452whp



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 AM.