2010 Stock Dyno numbers.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Way Down South Georgia
2010 Stock Dyno numbers.
Hey,
Just got back from Hot Import What? and had the car on the dyno for a baseline.
240Hp and ~262Lb-ft on Mase Engineering's Dyno Dynamics.
Just got back from Hot Import What? and had the car on the dyno for a baseline.
240Hp and ~262Lb-ft on Mase Engineering's Dyno Dynamics.
Trending Topics
I've never before paid close attention to a Mase graph, but have lots of hours on a Dyno Dynamics. Whatever he's using for the tach pickup or gearing value is weird, or he is using a wonky ramp rate, or both.
Unless he aborted the run 1000rpm before the rev limiter, everything is phase shifted to the left. That would artifically inflate the torque, because a Dyno Dynamics measures work (HP), and extrapolates the torque from a simple equation. This will not change peak whp values, though.
I also think he has a 10-12% correction factor on top of all that.
Doesn't matter, its only a tuning tool, but its hard to make sense of it the way it reads now.
Unless he aborted the run 1000rpm before the rev limiter, everything is phase shifted to the left. That would artifically inflate the torque, because a Dyno Dynamics measures work (HP), and extrapolates the torque from a simple equation. This will not change peak whp values, though.
I also think he has a 10-12% correction factor on top of all that.
Doesn't matter, its only a tuning tool, but its hard to make sense of it the way it reads now.
I've never before paid close attention to a Mase graph, but have lots of hours on a Dyno Dynamics. Whatever he's using for the tach pickup or gearing value is weird, or he is using a wonky ramp rate, or both.
Unless he aborted the run 1000rpm before the rev limiter, everything is phase shifted to the left. That would artifically inflate the torque, because a Dyno Dynamics measures work (HP), and extrapolates the torque from a simple equation. This will not change peak whp values, though.
I also think he has a 10-12% correction factor on top of all that.
Doesn't matter, its only a tuning tool, but its hard to make sense of it the way it reads now.
Unless he aborted the run 1000rpm before the rev limiter, everything is phase shifted to the left. That would artifically inflate the torque, because a Dyno Dynamics measures work (HP), and extrapolates the torque from a simple equation. This will not change peak whp values, though.
I also think he has a 10-12% correction factor on top of all that.
Doesn't matter, its only a tuning tool, but its hard to make sense of it the way it reads now.
We always use roller speed and an evo x gsr needs 4,250rpm @ 60mph to graph correctly.
I am also going to assume the correction factor is boosted up since a bone stock 08/09 evo x gsr will consistently make 195-205whp on a 1.0 CF on our dyno.
If this newer 2010 is making 240whp on a 1.0CF then we are looking at a nice boost in power from the earlier models!
Thanks for the information!
Mitsubishi enabled lean spool on the 2010 models. So even though the target AFR map is the same as the later roms of the 2008 model year, then car logs leaner AFRs than the 2008 models. I have verified this by tuning a 2010 Evo 10 this past Sunday. It logged leaner on the stock rom than 2008 cars on stock roms with similar mods.
Mitsubishi enabled lean spool on the 2010 models. So even though the target AFR map is the same as the later roms of the 2008 model year, then car logs leaner AFRs than the 2008 models. I have verified this by tuning a 2010 Evo 10 this past Sunday. It logged leaner on the stock rom than 2008 cars on stock roms with similar mods.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Moore Auto
Evo X Dyno Results
5
Jul 4, 2015 01:34 AM
pstl_pete
Evo X Dyno Results
17
Jan 28, 2010 05:18 PM
Fast_Freddie
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
8
Jan 19, 2010 01:59 PM
