Evo 10 MR with Dom 2 - adds testpipe - retuned
Feb 1, 2010, 08:29 AM
#16
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Off The Grid
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GST
In the MODS lists you list "custom SST tables" are these tables meant to handle to torque increase?
With the stock clutch pack in the SST are you experiencing any slipping/ how close do you think you are to the getrags 347ft/lb torque limit?
For comparo purposes do you happen to have any of the stock torque numbers from the 08 Evo.
In the MODS lists you list "custom SST tables" are these tables meant to handle to torque increase?
With the stock clutch pack in the SST are you experiencing any slipping/ how close do you think you are to the getrags 347ft/lb torque limit?
For comparo purposes do you happen to have any of the stock torque numbers from the 08 Evo.
Feb 1, 2010, 10:31 AM
#17
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We may swap the DOM out for your BBK-X and really see where this MR can do. After being retuned for TP the DOM does feel quite nice, but from what Mike, Delkat and Bryan have been saying, looks like the BBK-X can really put down some serious numbers/power with some incredible spool time!
Good question? Anyone care to chime in on this? I would assume it would be both, considering the TCU was never designed to manage Large amounts of TQ (400+ft/lb's TQ). Obviously the Stock Clutch Packs would not hold up well if at all with 374 ft/lb's of TQ for long periods of time. We've seen roughly 310 ft/lbs of TQ on GST's dyno, but the CP's just want to let go so Bryan backs off in the TQ department for longevity purpose.
Last edited by HR2L; Feb 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM.
Feb 1, 2010, 10:47 AM
#18
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- Bryan
Feb 1, 2010, 10:56 AM
#19
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GST
In the MODS lists you list "custom SST tables" are these tables meant to handle to torque increase?
With the stock clutch pack in the SST are you experiencing any slipping/ how close do you think you are to the getrags 347ft/lb torque limit?
For comparo purposes do you happen to have any of the stock torque numbers from the 08 Evo.
In the MODS lists you list "custom SST tables" are these tables meant to handle to torque increase?
With the stock clutch pack in the SST are you experiencing any slipping/ how close do you think you are to the getrags 347ft/lb torque limit?
For comparo purposes do you happen to have any of the stock torque numbers from the 08 Evo.
Yes the SST tables are tweaked to handle the extra power. I've see the SST clutches open even with stock turbo power.
This other MR is currently at 360 whp / 316 wtq on our dyno with no issues yet.
Feb 1, 2010, 11:14 AM
#20
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is the one of the stock baselines of this MR: (dotted lines)
Yes the SST tables are tweaked to handle the extra power. I've see the SST clutches open even with stock turbo power.
This other MR is currently at 360 whp / 316 wtq on our dyno with no issues yet.
Yes the SST tables are tweaked to handle the extra power. I've see the SST clutches open even with stock turbo power.
This other MR is currently at 360 whp / 316 wtq on our dyno with no issues yet.
Feb 1, 2010, 11:16 AM
#21
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOVA
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good question? Anyone care to chime in on this? I would assume it would be both, considering the TCU was never designed to manage Large amounts of TQ. Obviously the Stock Clutch Packs would not hold up well if at all with 374 ft/lb's of TQ for long periods of time. We've seen roughly 310 ft/lbs of TQ on GST's dyno, but the CP's just want to let go so Bryan backs off in the TQ department for longevity purpose.
I know people who design production transmissions for a living at they say that when these figures are listed they are a "safe" maximum with a safety factor built in and are tipically a limit of how much torque the transmission can hand as an input. i.e. you could run the transmission all day at 347ft/lb.
I belive the stock ft/lb of torque on the Evo X is 291lb/ft (cant remember the exact number of the top of my head) which on the stock graph on the dino shows up as bout 226ft/lb of torque at the wheels with the tuned showing a 70ft/lb of torque increase... so current output about 360lb/ft, which is beyond what Getrag says is the maximum but probably well withing the safty factor of what the transmission can handle before failure.
Last edited by WolvieDC; Feb 1, 2010 at 11:26 AM.
Feb 1, 2010, 01:28 PM
#22
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice numbers. Congratulations.
It was good to meet you again last Friday. Am hoping to get my boost leak fixed on Thursday for Bryan to finish working his magic.
It was good to meet you again last Friday. Am hoping to get my boost leak fixed on Thursday for Bryan to finish working his magic.
Feb 1, 2010, 03:52 PM
#23
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Feels good when you get on gas now!
Need to have my WGA looked @, and probably replaced (going back to stock blouch WGA). Then a fine tune for myself as well.
Feb 1, 2010, 09:01 PM
#25
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, should have never changed it. Thought though the Forge WGA might do a better job at holding more boost up top, but guess I was wrong (way wrong). Allot now say they have been having issues with them on the X turbos. Not even going to fool around with adjusting it, just throw the one that came with the DOM 2 back onto it (guess there pre-tensioned already) and call it a day. Hoping once we get it dialed in to pick up a bit more up top in both HP & TQ.
Feb 6, 2010, 07:08 PM
#26
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
370 whp now. Still on 91 oct, still on stock cams. Excellent power for a Evo 10 MR SST!
Will post graphs and boost plot later.
- Bryan
Feb 6, 2010, 09:24 PM
#27
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its pure awesome power Bryan! So glad we dumped the Forge. It pulls so hard to 7K in 4th and 5th (yeah, I decided to test her) Thanks for Everything! Cams....oh Cams!
The car is a beast, seriously.
Last edited by HR2L; Feb 6, 2010 at 09:44 PM.
