Low 3582HTA Numbers :(
My car picked up 30hp 30tq from cams that are worse then stock 
Hmmmmmm something doesn't sound right here.
Where I agree I would not purchase them or recommend them to anyone with the current cam selections available for our cars now a days. For the 280 I paid for them new 30/30 was worth every penny.
Going top S2's though now
Brian Crower doesnt suck, they dont make good stuff for the evo, but in the srt4, his cams worked flawlessly and were the preferred cam by alot of people...
what works for one car might not work as great for another...
i have an 8 also and i went +27hp (330whp) from my original tune (297whp) with just the bc stage 2 cams, no springs/retainers... i took them out though and went to kelfords for the fp black setup... they werent bad cams, i personally liked em for the money... Ivey tuned, and the car ran very smooth, just didnt like to start up that well in the cold and had a very rough idle until fully warmed up...
Brian Crower doesnt suck, they dont make good stuff for the evo, but in the srt4, his cams worked flawlessly and were the preferred cam by alot of people...
what works for one car might not work as great for another...
Brian Crower doesnt suck, they dont make good stuff for the evo, but in the srt4, his cams worked flawlessly and were the preferred cam by alot of people...
what works for one car might not work as great for another...
please note that every BC success story is with 8/9s. The BC cams on the X S.U.C.K big time. Something went horribly wrong. Why be cheap on such a critical part? Kelfords/Cosworth/GSC aren't that much more, but they're that much better...
Here is an interesting post by Gunzo an extremely knowledgable member about BC Cams for the X.
"Anyways.. I've tested the BC 2.3/4 .. not sure how similiar they are .. its not bad actually .. and it has bc cams .. and yes .. I've tested MX1 and I AM NOT IMPRESSED.. I've also used BC stroker on my older B16 too (stroked to 2.0) . it was not bad ..
I mean to the guys who committed to buy and tested the products .. I salute you .. to the others who heard from his dog's friends owners' girlfriends' brothers .. give the product a chance to proof themselves ?? DISCLAIMER - I AM NEITHER FOR NOR AGAINST BC !! .. I'm just saying give it a chance .. imagine if its good and news spread .. it won't be as cheap anymore "
I take these opinions with much consideration.
Last edited by RU EVO; Jul 15, 2010 at 06:14 PM.
I overlayed the off the street pull, vs my best run.
The boost was actually lowered to achieve these numbers as the water injection kit is injecting..........mostly water.
Ran ok, I think with more time and some changes, I like GSC and Kelford for the evoX, there is more power to be made.
On one 4g63 pro car we did this week the BC to Kelford 288 swap netted 80hp and 80ftlb at 7 psi less boost.
I am sorry if my opinion on BC cams doesn't make everyone happy but usually the BC is chosen soley on price and that is never a good basis on which to make a choice for power producing parts.
Sean
The boost was actually lowered to achieve these numbers as the water injection kit is injecting..........mostly water.
Ran ok, I think with more time and some changes, I like GSC and Kelford for the evoX, there is more power to be made.
On one 4g63 pro car we did this week the BC to Kelford 288 swap netted 80hp and 80ftlb at 7 psi less boost.
I am sorry if my opinion on BC cams doesn't make everyone happy but usually the BC is chosen soley on price and that is never a good basis on which to make a choice for power producing parts.
Sean
I overlayed the off the street pull, vs my best run.
The boost was actually lowered to achieve these numbers as the water injection kit is injecting..........mostly water.
Ran ok, I think with more time and some changes, I like GSC and Kelford for the evoX, there is more power to be made.
On one 4g63 pro car we did this week the BC to Kelford 288 swap netted 80hp and 80ftlb at 7 psi less boost.
I am sorry if my opinion on BC cams doesn't make everyone happy but usually the BC is chosen soley on price and that is never a good basis on which to make a choice for power producing parts.
Sean
The boost was actually lowered to achieve these numbers as the water injection kit is injecting..........mostly water.
Ran ok, I think with more time and some changes, I like GSC and Kelford for the evoX, there is more power to be made.
On one 4g63 pro car we did this week the BC to Kelford 288 swap netted 80hp and 80ftlb at 7 psi less boost.
I am sorry if my opinion on BC cams doesn't make everyone happy but usually the BC is chosen soley on price and that is never a good basis on which to make a choice for power producing parts.
Sean
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
109
Mar 2, 2011 04:00 PM
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
55
Nov 17, 2009 02:40 PM
David Buschur
Evo X Dyno Results
28
Jan 25, 2009 10:39 PM




