EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Stock motor and 93 Octane + ETS "goodness" for an easy 500hp!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 06:35 AM
Share
  #1  
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works's Avatar
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside
Stock motor and 93 Octane + ETS "goodness" for an easy 500hp!!
So if you've ever asked yourself "What's the most easiest path to 500awhp on pump with my Evo X????" ---- This is the thread for you.

Stock motor. Stock cams.
DW injectors
Walboro pump
Intercooler
Catback exhaust with testpipe
ETS 6262kit
E-Spec tuned ecu
27psi ,,, 93 octane only





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIB1zoQmHvw
Last edited by E-Spec@Tach Motor Works; Jan 27, 2011 at 06:39 AM.
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 06:42 AM
Share
  #2  
armysoldier1073's Avatar
armysoldier1073
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio (WPAFB)
What is the TQ with this setup? never mind..... took a bit for my puter to load pics....lol
Last edited by armysoldier1073; Jan 27, 2011 at 07:02 AM.
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:00 AM
Share
  #3  
SilverEvoX's Avatar
SilverEvoX
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Nice numbers but why use stock cams still, that would probably be another 30-40whp easily. What clutch are you running in the car and how is it taking to that power level?
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:00 AM
Share
  #4  
SilverEvoX's Avatar
SilverEvoX
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by armysoldier1073
What is the TQ with this setup?
372wtq...it's in the graph.
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:03 AM
Share
  #5  
armysoldier1073's Avatar
armysoldier1073
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio (WPAFB)
i seen that a few min ago. for some reason that pic wasnt there when i looked earlier.
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:05 AM
Share
  #6  
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works's Avatar
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside
Originally Posted by armysoldier1073
i seen that a few min ago. for some reason that pic wasnt there when i looked earlier.
Ninja edit!!
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:07 AM
Share
  #7  
armysoldier1073's Avatar
armysoldier1073
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio (WPAFB)
whew.... now i dont feel so dumb for not seein it. Very nice.
Reply
0

Trending Topics

Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:07 AM
Share
  #8  
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works's Avatar
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside
Originally Posted by SilverEvoX
Nice numbers but why use stock cams still, that would probably be another 30-40whp easily. What clutch are you running in the car and how is it taking to that power level?
He's on an act clutch, and we installed diff pins while we were at it.

On the 4b11, I'm a big fan of just doing a complete build vs a cam install. He'll save money by just doing it all one time.
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 11:13 AM
Share
  #9  
murlo26's Avatar
murlo26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Great power and I love the flat torque curve...but boy that 6262 is laggy....gotta build it and turn that boost up to make it worth while

700whp or bust!
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 11:51 AM
Share
  #10  
Wht9er's Avatar
Wht9er
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: CT
Erk I see you have time to make this thread but not text me back Let me know what's up.
Last edited by Wht9er; Jan 27, 2011 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 12:23 PM
Share
  #11  
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works's Avatar
E-Spec@Tach Motor Works
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside
Originally Posted by Wht9er
Erk I see you have time to make this thread but not text me back Let me know what's up.

LOL... dude just call me--- These android phones are funky!!
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 04:11 PM
Share
  #12  
Poloiceberg's Avatar
Poloiceberg
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Originally Posted by murlo26
Great power and I love the flat torque curve...but boy that 6262 is laggy....gotta build it and turn that boost up to make it worth while

700whp or bust!
The lag is not bad honestly, I definately feel a wait compared to the fp red I had before but its not bad. Off boost the car feels normal not sluggish at all. Also love the bump in gas mileage off boost. I really want to build the motor now and go for 600 but I'm stuck deciding whether I should sleeve the motor or not. Im also debating the whole 2.0 vs 2.3. Decisions decisions lol
Reply
0
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 04:22 PM
Share
  #13  
ETS Michael's Avatar
ETS Michael
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
The launch at the end of the video looks super nice
Reply
0
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 06:40 AM
Share
  #14  
Wht9er's Avatar
Wht9er
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
The launch at the end of the video looks super nice

yea that launch pretty much showed the lag isnt too bad. it took off the line rather quickly
Reply
0
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 06:59 AM
Share
  #15  
murlo26's Avatar
murlo26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
That's why we have a 2 step...so we can launch our cars with lag

A better judge of "lag" would be a roll out in first then gun it.

If you drive so called laggy cars different, shift higher etc etc you won't really notice the lag nearly as much.
Reply
0



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 AM.