EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

AMS 2.3l ID1600cc's 900x-91 Octane Results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2011, 12:32 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Magnumpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Who Knows
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMS 2.3l ID1600cc's 900x-91 Octane Results!
Hello,

We just finished up this car and I wanted to share it.




This car has the following:

AMS 2.3l Big Bore
Injector Dynamics 1600cc Inj
AMS 900x Turbo kit
AMS supporting mods
Kelford B Cams
Stock Head
Stock ECU
25psi
91 octane


Car made great numbers for 91 octane! The customer only has 91 where he lives so it was tuned for it instead of 93.

Thanks for looking,

Mitch Mckee
AMS
Last edited by Magnumpsi; Mar 10, 2011 at 06:16 AM.
Magnumpsi is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 9, 2011, 12:38 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member

iTrader: (42)
 
Boltz.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not very often you get to see a FLAT torque curve all the way to redline! Looks like you guys fabbed up a blower on that thing by the shape of the curve.

Great work Mitch!
Boltz. is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 9, 2011, 12:48 PM
  #3  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
bimmer8181's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: los angeles
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, great power band.
bimmer8181 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 9, 2011, 07:57 PM
  #4  
Newbie
 
EVO-EVO-EVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ozamis City, Philippines
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question More HP with more RPMs?
Would this have happened if the run was stopped @ 8,000 RPMs, given that the HP curve was still headed towards the sky @ 7,200 RPMs? I am assuming that the "Built" 2.3L motor can still safely operate @ 8,000 RPMs.
EVO-EVO-EVO is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 9, 2011, 08:01 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by EVO-EVO-EVO
Would this have happened if the run was stopped @ 8,000 RPMs, given that the HP curve was still headed towards the sky @ 7,200 RPMs? I am assuming that the "Built" 2.3L motor can still safely operate @ 8,000 RPMs.
i am pretty sure they have run the 2.2/2.3L motors up to 10k rpms.

Nice graph AMS, looks great.

Any idea when those ID1600's are going to be available to everyone?
murlo26 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 9, 2011, 09:01 PM
  #6  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
tscompusa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pa
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
great power on 91 Mitch. That turbo kit was definitely doing serious work.
tscompusa2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 9, 2011, 09:24 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
sspaladin28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy crap that is stupid power on 91 Octane and that torque "curve" is awesome!
sspaladin28 is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old Mar 9, 2011, 11:24 PM
  #8  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
MiTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NYC/CT
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
great work mitch that a excellant power for that type of boost and gas

Mike
MiTech is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 12:04 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
nonschlont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ca
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nice looking graph, and power on 91
nonschlont is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 12:27 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
 
palmerblock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice torque... wonder what a ported head would do..
palmerblock is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 02:26 AM
  #11  
Newbie
 
EVO-EVO-EVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ozamis City, Philippines
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still wondering if more RPM would have produced more HP? The Dyno Graph makes me think the motor would have.
EVO-EVO-EVO is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 04:24 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
TheNEWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Magnumpsi
AMS 2.3l Stroker
So you use your own fabricated crank or the ERL one?

NEWB
TheNEWB is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 06:18 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Magnumpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Who Knows
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didnt mean stroker. Generally when I write 2.3l stroker just seems to follow. This is done in bore and what allows us to be able to rev the motor out to 9500RPM.


Mitch
Magnumpsi is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 06:31 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
 
bluedevilx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats the fun with the evo x you can just bore it instead of doing a stroker. Great power though.
bluedevilx is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 10, 2011, 06:33 AM
  #15  
Evolving Member
 
TheNEWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Magnumpsi
I didnt mean stroker. Generally when I write 2.3l stroker just seems to follow. This is done in bore and what allows us to be able to rev the motor out to 9500RPM.


Mitch
.....................erection!!!!!!!

what bore size is that!?
TheNEWB is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: AMS 2.3l ID1600cc's 900x-91 Octane Results!


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 AM.