Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Another Stock Turbo E85 - 363whp/428tq ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 08:48 PM
  #1  
tavo_evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Gering, NE
Another Stock Turbo E85 - 363whp/428tq ?

I just recently got tuned with this list of mods:

AMS FMIC
AMS UICP and LICP
MAP downpipe with O2 dump
Ichiba Test pipe
Top Speed PRO 1 Catback
Wallbro 255
1100cc FIC
Grimspeed 3 port
Cobb Intake

I noticed that my horsepower to the wheels was not what I was expecting but my torque is super high which feels awesome on the car. Any ideas or suggestion why is that? I got tuned at tobz and he did an amazing job; I'm happy with the results but I wonder why my graph is different from most stock turbo E85 evo tens around here
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 08:50 PM
  #2  
Supraboy1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Allen
Depends on which dyno, correction factor, and other factors.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
Depends on which dyno, correction factor, and other factors.
Very much so, tobz is one of the higher ones for sure.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #4  
xezerax's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Can you post up a picture of the graph? That torque must be awesome but I would be a little nervous about it
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:22 PM
  #5  
tavo_evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Gering, NE
Originally Posted by murlo26
Very much so, tobz is one of the higher ones for sure.
by that you mean that his dyno reads higher than usual? compared to the rest?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
tavo_evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Gering, NE
Originally Posted by xezerax
Can you post up a picture of the graph? That torque must be awesome but I would be a little nervous about it
Why be nervous about it? pushing the limits of the car?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #7  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by tavo_evo
by that you mean that his dyno reads higher than usual? compared to the rest?
Not trying to start ****, but yes because he has a decent CF on it. No big deal, just take the numbers for the gains thats it.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
tavo_evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Gering, NE
I'm going to take a picture of the graph and post it; this is my first time getting tuned so please understand my noobness
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #9  
tavo_evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Gering, NE
Here is the graph; let me know what you think please
Attached Thumbnails Another Stock Turbo E85 - 363whp/428tq ?-photo-2.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 09:48 PM
  #10  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
12.6 is the min AFR? Seems pretty lean.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 01:57 AM
  #11  
redsun727's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: florida
stock internal??
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 04:07 AM
  #12  
Supraboy1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Allen
The peak of 31.3 psi on stock internals is high I'm my opinion. Also the peak AFR of 15.8 is DANGEROUS. Even if for just a few seconds while under heavy boost, you ran lean that's bad. My AFR is 11.8 to 12 across the board for comparison
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 04:57 AM
  #13  
xezerax's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Yea I would be nervous about that kind of torque on stock rods. And for a mustang dyno those numbers are pretty high, but thats probably due to the CF like Murlo said.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 07:09 AM
  #14  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
The peak of 31.3 psi on stock internals is high I'm my opinion. Also the peak AFR of 15.8 is DANGEROUS. Even if for just a few seconds while under heavy boost, you ran lean that's bad. My AFR is 11.8 to 12 across the board for comparison
the 15.8 is probably from part throttle to wot for a split second.. regardless it can be avoided when the fuel maps mapped properly in that load area crossover.

that dyno has a really high CF, i forget what it is exactly, but its pretty high. it reads higher then a dynojet i believe.

if thats 12.5 on a tailpipe sniffer its actually around the 11.8-12 area anyways depending on how the sniffer reads he uses.

e85 runs a really cool intake charge as it is since the latent heat of vaporization is much higher.. egt's and everything will be much lower with it so theres more room for error when it comes to afr swings. the normal target i go for and most others is 11.8 after spoolup on a gasoline wideband.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 07:28 AM
  #15  
tavo_evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Gering, NE
I am running stock internals; I also just purchased a wideband because it seems like from your comments that my engine is not on the safe side

He told me that this was a very conservative tune but the AFR is starting to worry me
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:28 PM.