ETS 6266, Cobb Built Car, 724whp
Its all about keeping the car one gear lower than what you were used to. Give it a little time and you wont even notice it anymore.
Aaron
Cobb didn't post the pump gas numbers in the online system, but I do have the printout. So... for some fun learning:

Now compare to the FP Black on the same engine, also on pump gas, 28psi

Look close..... the torque curve on the 6266 almost 100% MATCHES the black at lower rpms, and passes it by 4500. Basically, I picked up 90whp - with NEGLIGIBLE loss in low-end. Oh, and put in race gas and blow up 724+whp.
Precision - you've created a ****ing monster turbo.

Now compare to the FP Black on the same engine, also on pump gas, 28psi
Look close..... the torque curve on the 6266 almost 100% MATCHES the black at lower rpms, and passes it by 4500. Basically, I picked up 90whp - with NEGLIGIBLE loss in low-end. Oh, and put in race gas and blow up 724+whp.
Precision - you've created a ****ing monster turbo.
So basically this thing really comes to life around 4500 rpm, and is a rocket to redline, that aint that bad on the street considering if you notice some stock frame turbos hit at the same time but die off bad.
Last edited by ravnos04; Apr 30, 2012 at 12:07 PM.
I'd think similar. C16 vs E85 seems to vary depending on who tested it, with most making a bit more w/ e85.
I am thinking about switching to E85 if I can find a reliable way to get it in quantity and transport it to the tracks with me. Magnafuel 4303 + 2000cc and I'd be good to go. Then I could always be running 700+ whp, and more important, I'd have a much cooler fuel to help keep temps under control.
I am thinking about switching to E85 if I can find a reliable way to get it in quantity and transport it to the tracks with me. Magnafuel 4303 + 2000cc and I'd be good to go. Then I could always be running 700+ whp, and more important, I'd have a much cooler fuel to help keep temps under control.







Damn that thing pulls, I thought you were short-shifting right around 6000