Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

ETS 6266, Cobb Built Car, 724whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:41 AM
  #61  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
As PRS posted, my fuel setup is listed in the first post. I have a modified 044 pump, and it is more than enough on pump gas and c16. If I was on e85, I would need two pumps or a larger single pump.

Also, on the X platform, in-tank double pumpers are worthless, they still have fuel starvation issues. Which is why I have the fuel cell setup - no starve in corners.
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #62  
PRS's Avatar
PRS
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by chkmgnt59
As PRS posted, my fuel setup is listed in the first post. I have a modified 044 pump, and it is more than enough on pump gas and c16. If I was on e85, I would need two pumps or a larger single pump.

Also, on the X platform, in-tank double pumpers are worthless, they still have fuel starvation issues. Which is why I have the fuel cell setup - no starve in corners.

For road racing yes!, I just did a 6266 With double pumper and no issues.

The extra volume the double pumper supplies when making over 500WHP on our dyno is needed. I wont tune one above 500WHP without. As i have seen issues with fuel pressure above that.

Since your using a fuel cell with a 044 on c16 your in a better position.

Injectors spray what you supply it with. Keep nice pressure at the inlet and be safer.

Weight out the alternative of going lean...........
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #63  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Yes, for a street car, the double pumpers do just fine. I was speaking from a road race perspective - should have made that clear
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #64  
NY Black momba's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 348
Likes: 1
From: New York Longisland
wow nice power and the power band looks sick this was actually a turbo i was thinking about getting
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #65  
NY Black momba's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 348
Likes: 1
From: New York Longisland
you dont think the 6766 would be good for the street?
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 01:40 PM
  #66  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
It would be worse, and I know a 6766 wouldn't be good for my transmission :-)
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 01:47 PM
  #67  
NY Black momba's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 348
Likes: 1
From: New York Longisland
how much boost are you on
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 01:49 PM
  #68  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
I'll kindly refer you to read my initial post, where boost is clearly marked.
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 03:09 PM
  #69  
Pirana's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 5
From: Arlington, TX
Why would it be worst for the "mexican highways"? I've been contemplating going for the 6766.
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 04:18 PM
  #70  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Road racing = road course aka track racing. I don't race on public streets anymore vic :-)

it'd be worse for driving normally on public roads, and on the race tracks, the extra lag would just give me less rpms to work with, and if I ever dropped out of boost it sucks ***** to have a 150hp engine lol
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #71  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
when you gonna get it out to MSR?
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #72  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Was there this weekend. Turning 1.25s on 24psi 500whp map. Not too bad. 1.7 cw

No idea what it would have done with higher boost or c16. Wanted to take it easy this time out :-)
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:43 PM
  #73  
GO ON 3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Canada
yes sir yum yum!!
Reply
Old May 24, 2012 | 03:15 PM
  #74  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by chkmgnt59
Was there this weekend. Turning 1.25s on 24psi 500whp map. Not too bad. 1.7 cw

No idea what it would have done with higher boost or c16. Wanted to take it easy this time out :-)

were you there with drivers edge? or did you go friday?
Reply
Old May 24, 2012 | 04:01 PM
  #75  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Was there with de
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 PM.