Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

RRE tuned Evo x

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 03:47 PM
  #16  
utggevox's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Originally Posted by gas
Nope just 91, the bbx-lite is awesome, RRE thinks is the ets big maf that gets me more power.
How big is the ets "big" maf adapter? I know there regular intake just uses the stock 2.5" maf so is it just 3" like the ams intake or 3.5"? I'm sure the cams helped a ton on top end though. I'd be really interested to see what your setup could do while chugging some E85 any plans to make the conversion or do a dual map setup?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #17  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
The big MAF Is 3.5"
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 01:30 AM
  #18  
Darrinyuan's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
The big MAF Is 3.5"
I have ets intake already,so I just need the big maf and retune?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 10:43 AM
  #19  
Bigstakk's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
RREs dyno reads about -3% lower than a dynojet which is what most tuners use and about 8-10% higher than a mustang heartbreaker dyno. Those numbers are beastly either way...
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 11:38 AM
  #20  
Mike W's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 337
Likes: 4
From: Road Race Engineering
Perspective on the RRE Dynapack numbers:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...yno-graph.html

Posts #22 and #98

This car made another 25 whp on top of several other EVO Xs on the exact same setup other than the ETS 3.5" MAF. We are usually stuck right at 400 whp on 91 with a FP Red, GT30R or BBX. Cams, full proper turbo back, FMIC... the usual good stuff. AEM intakes, Injen, random filters stuck on 3" pipes... all stuck at 400 whp. Except for this car. Go figure.

Mike W
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 12:34 PM
  #21  
gas's Avatar
gas
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
hey

Im also not restricted by any emissions laws,lol
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 01:48 PM
  #22  
Mistermarc's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by Mike W
Perspective on the RRE Dynapack numbers:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...yno-graph.html

Posts #22 and #98

This car made another 25 whp on top of several other EVO Xs on the exact same setup other than the ETS 3.5" MAF. We are usually stuck right at 400 whp on 91 with a FP Red, GT30R or BBX. Cams, full proper turbo back, FMIC... the usual good stuff. AEM intakes, Injen, random filters stuck on 3" pipes... all stuck at 400 whp. Except for this car. Go figure.

Mike W
Hey Mike by no means I'm trying to rag on your dyno, I love it, you tuned my car and I was impressed by everything you did. Just from what I've seen things have been lower compared to your dyno. I know comparing dyno's is a big no-no but I remember when I got tuned from you I read about 350whp and 330ish wtq and that was with full bolt-ons and then on a dyno dynamics it was about 305whp. I just really thought a dynapack read a little higher that's all, I have nowhere near the experience you have tuning, and if I move back to Cali Ill be bring my car back because I hate all the tuners out here in ATL...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
godlikelol
Evo X Dyno Results
29
Jul 17, 2017 11:02 PM
EvoIXMR671
Evo General
1
Jan 2, 2017 10:37 PM
JDM936
Evo X Dyno Results
6
Dec 12, 2013 07:38 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 AM.