Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2014 MR, pretty poor results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 07:48 AM
  #1  
ardevas09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 7
From: Gainesville, VA
2014 MR, pretty poor results

I'm not terribly concerned about numbers, but these seem incredibly low. Any insight?

Mod list:
AEM intake
Megan Bellmouth housing
Perrin HFC DP
Greddy Revolution RS Exhaust
GS 3 port

The tuner said I'm running at 24 psi, on 93 octane


Name:  bXxgpV4.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  503 Bytes

Any insight?

edit: stock evo x reads about 230/225 on this dyno

Last edited by ardevas09; Nov 3, 2015 at 01:41 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 12:29 PM
  #2  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
MRs dyno a bit lower than GSR due to losses in the SST transmission http://www.socalevo.net/threads/2216...-Costs-Bucks-P

As long as you are happy with the way the car "feels" I would not worry about it.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 01:06 PM
  #3  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Dyno Dynamics tend to read low, and are usually in line with a mustang dyno. your probably right around 290-300whp and wtq on a dynojet..
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 02:51 PM
  #4  
ardevas09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 7
From: Gainesville, VA
Originally Posted by nemsin
MRs dyno a bit lower than GSR due to losses in the SST transmission http://www.socalevo.net/threads/2216...-Costs-Bucks-P

As long as you are happy with the way the car "feels" I would not worry about it.
TBH, I'm not happy with it. It's still feels slow and boring, to me anyway. I'm concerned with doing much more than IC piping, because I know how unreliable any car gets when you start getting heavy into the modification.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 03:29 PM
  #5  
MisterRegato's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 4
From: PA
my stock MR dyoned 222whp on a mustang. With 3 port and exhaust 270 seems like youre right there man. If it feels slow sell it or mod more. The red or blue pill my friend
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 03:51 PM
  #6  
Gh3ttoRoM3o's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
Retracted due to possibly sounding rude.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 04:42 PM
  #7  
ardevas09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 7
From: Gainesville, VA
Originally Posted by Gh3ttoRoM3o
Retracted due to possibly sounding rude.
Feel free to PM me if you don't want to sound rude publicly
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 07:36 PM
  #8  
hispanicpanic's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 725
Likes: 13
From: san antonio
UICP for sure. A front mount will only net you 10 hp on a stock turbo. Other than that, your tuner may have stopped there because of excessive duty cycle on your injectors. If that's the case, you can upgrade your pump and drill your fuel return. Make sure your fuel pressure is 40 ish at idle. Real talk, you won't net anything over 290 tho with a cat on a stock turbo (mustang #'s). No idea how a dynapak compares. My evo with no cat and no muffler made 300 on kozmic's dyno on a stock intercooler.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 07:59 PM
  #9  
juan.c.olivos's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Norristown, PA
Hey, I hit almost 350 whp with very similar mods. I did have IC piping though. I would say to talk to your tuner and ask him his opinion. If not, get a different tune. Don't get discouraged! There is a lot of potential in your Monster!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 09:06 PM
  #10  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
None of this or the replies to the OP's post means anything without knowing what a stock Evo 10 dynos on this dyno.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 01:02 AM
  #11  
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: :noitacoL
So when are you gonna finish installing all the boltons?
Obviously your not finished!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 05:04 AM
  #12  
Gh3ttoRoM3o's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ardevas09
Feel free to PM me if you don't want to sound rude publicly
I'll just re-word it

Originally Posted by razorlab
None of this or the replies to the OP's post means anything without knowing what a stock Evo 10 dynos on this dyno.
It's pretty much this. I can't really talk numbers since we have nothing to compare it with and there's too many variables that we'd have to make assumptions on (quality of gas/quality of tune/dyno numbers for your car base (there have been some Evo X MRs in the 210's HP stock we don't know if this was a 50HP increase or a 20HP increase etc, so I'll just talk in general.

The remaining pieces you have left (bolt-on-wise) aren't going to be netting you much at all. You already got the major boltons. The piping isn't going to do much at all in regards to HP, more responsiveness from the UICP, but the LICP practically nothing, the BOV if you're ****s leaking but I doubt it at that boost level, the stocker should hold that all day.

Last edited by Gh3ttoRoM3o; Nov 3, 2015 at 05:09 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 07:03 AM
  #13  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
+1 on needing a base run on that same dyno. Dynos are meant to measure delta, not necessarily measure total power output.

Honest question: are you really using all of that power? I've met few drivers that do. The others then mod themselves out of the car. Throw it in super sport manual mode and do some track days

If you need more, can you consider e85? Maybe stock framed turbo upgrade? Either way you're looking at bigger injectors and fuel pump upgrade as well. These cars can hold plenty under 400whp/wtq without big worries. Only reason I'd caution against is that you have a SST and a warranty that would surely be voided if anything major happened.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 07:40 AM
  #14  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Check out these results. I think for the dyno you are on that is about right. My MR with just a single exit catback exhaust made 300WHP on a dynojet. It could just be the difference in the dyno. I would take it to the track and see what MPH it traps. I went 12.8 @ 104. You should be a little faster than that.

- Robert
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 08:24 AM
  #15  
ardevas09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 7
From: Gainesville, VA
Originally Posted by razorlab
None of this or the replies to the OP's post means anything without knowing what a stock Evo 10 dynos on this dyno.
the tuner said around 230
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 PM.