Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

8374 on stock engine results, pump93

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2018 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
JDMV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 77
Likes: 44
From: Philly
8374 on stock engine results, pump93

After my FP red took a dump, I decided to go the EFR route and had the 8374 CBRD kit done at CBRD in York, PA.
My 08 is stock engine, ETS intake w/3" MAF, id1000, aem320, gs ebcs, AMS 3.5" ic, ETS hard piping, AMS dual exhaust, test pipe.

The FP red felt like an upgraded stock. The 8374 keeps pulling everywhere. The 8374 also spools the same as the FP Red and makes more power everywhere. This is the IWG kit.

443whp/327wtq (low-reading mustang), spools around 4k (overlayed w/FP red)



CBRD sent me a block off plate for the internal bypass valve as I was having partial throttle fluttering. I put back my Tial QRJ and now there's no fluttering during "normal" highway driving at 80mph @ 4k rpm in 5th. Pulls just as nicely. Transient response was slightly diminished with the Tial, but that's expected through eliminating the built-in bypass. The daily drivability is great now, and the turbo is quick to spool.

There seem to be no downsides compared to stock turbo on stock engine. Couldn't be more satisfied. Tuned @ 25 psi

Reply
Old Dec 16, 2018 | 10:50 AM
  #2  
Strm Trpr's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 9
From: NorCal
Nice results!
so is this the 0.92 a/r internally gated TS T4 hot side or the 0.83 a/r internally gated SS T3 hot side?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2018 | 09:07 PM
  #3  
JDMV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 77
Likes: 44
From: Philly
.92 a/r iwg t4
Chad kept things on the conservative side as well
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2018 | 09:21 AM
  #4  
walls's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Reading Pa
Good stuff. Mine is going to Chad in January for a timing chain and the 8374 kit. How many miles do you have on your 08?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 08:19 AM
  #5  
JDMV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 77
Likes: 44
From: Philly
just hit 80k.
you'll love it
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 10:59 AM
  #6  
Strm Trpr's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 9
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by JDMV8
After my FP red took a dump, I decided to go the EFR route and had the 8374 CBRD kit done at CBRD in York, PA.
My 08 is stock engine, ETS intake w/3" MAF, id1000, aem320, gs ebcs, AMS 3.5" ic, ETS hard piping, AMS dual exhaust, test pipe.

The FP red felt like an upgraded stock. The 8374 keeps pulling everywhere. The 8374 also spools the same as the FP Red and makes more power everywhere. This is the IWG kit.

443whp/327wtq (low-reading mustang), spools around 4k (overlayed w/FP red)



CBRD sent me a block off plate for the internal bypass valve as I was having partial throttle fluttering. I put back my Tial QRJ and now there's no fluttering during "normal" highway driving at 80mph @ 4k rpm in 5th. Pulls just as nicely. Transient response was slightly diminished with the Tial, but that's expected through eliminating the built-in bypass. The daily drivability is great now, and the turbo is quick to spool.

There seem to be no downsides compared to stock turbo on stock engine. Couldn't be more satisfied. Tuned @ 25 psi

Nice, is that a small runner ts t4 manifold?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2018 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
alpinaturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 795
Likes: 54
From: California
Do you by any chance have your original dyno off the car on stock turbo?
Curious how much bottom end is lost to either FP Red and/or 8374.
Not because its not worth it, but just to understand the change below 4000rpm.

How do you perceive the torque below 3500rpm, stock turbo to 8374?

Thank you.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2018 | 03:26 PM
  #8  
JDMV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 77
Likes: 44
From: Philly
Originally Posted by Strm Trpr
Nice, is that a small runner ts t4 manifold?
yes, 1.25" runners

Originally Posted by alpinaturbo
Do you by any chance have your original dyno off the car on stock turbo?
Curious how much bottom end is lost to either FP Red and/or 8374.
Not because its not worth it, but just to understand the change below 4000rpm.

How do you perceive the torque below 3500rpm, stock turbo to 8374?

Thank you.
yes

this is off of a dynojet at IveyTune in NJ. likely would've made high 200s on CBRD's dyno.
I wouldn't say too much daily drivability was lost to the red or EFR from stock.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2019 | 12:01 AM
  #9  
robos4's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 18
From: Singapore
JDMV8,

Can you explain more about the highway driving flutter? What exactly was happening? We aren't talking about surge here right?

I am about to tune my 8374 and don't have a BOV or want to instlal one (coming from an EFR 7163).

Rob
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2019 | 12:05 PM
  #10  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by robos4
JDMV8,

Can you explain more about the highway driving flutter? What exactly was happening? We aren't talking about surge here right?

I am about to tune my 8374 and don't have a BOV or want to instlal one (coming from an EFR 7163).

Rob
It happens because the turbo is starting to ride the surge line of the compressor due to being at part throttle but you're at the RPM where the turbo is getting enough energy from the exhaust that it's starting to try to make boost that the engine doesn't need. A softer BOV spring usually resolves this, which is why the QRJ fixed it. They likely used the -3psi spring it comes with.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2019 | 07:09 PM
  #11  
gerikivan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 5
From: Glendale, CA
im in the same route as you but instead i went with fullrace ewg and everything is almost done... i went with ewg because i read it before that the drivability sucks.. at what rpm do you start feeling the turbo to spool and what rpm do you hit full boost? would a 3inch intake bottleneck the 8374? i was actually expecting the 8374 to make 380tq tho but i guess not.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2019 | 07:38 PM
  #12  
robos4's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 18
From: Singapore
Wouldn't a 3" intake cause you to go way over your max MAF volt reading anyway?

I would have thought you need a 3.5" intake with nicely setup MAF...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2019 | 08:01 PM
  #13  
gerikivan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 5
From: Glendale, CA
Originally Posted by robos4
Wouldn't a 3" intake cause you to go way over your max MAF volt reading anyway?

I would have thought you need a 3.5" intake with nicely setup MAF...
i havent got a tune yet so im still in the process on prepping the car and see if i would need some stuff for the evo.. right now im using a ams cold air intake but if i would need a 3.5 intake then ill get one before the tune.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2019 | 09:59 AM
  #14  
slythy's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by JDMV8
yes, 1.25" runners
this is off of a dynojet at IveyTune in NJ. likely would've made high 200s on CBRD's dyno.
I wouldn't say too much daily drivability was lost to the red or EFR from stock.
I'm looking at doing an 8474 and was wondering if you thought 300rpm's of spool loss would really make the car feel laggy. I'm just looking for as many opinions as possible about the 8374 before i make up my mind. Im thinking a little bit lower boost should keep the motor a little happier while still getting high 600's to 700whp.

Thanks
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2019 | 09:54 PM
  #15  
gerikivan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 5
From: Glendale, CA
is there any pictures of the engine bay? did you mount the bov backwards?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 AM.