Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

COBB tuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
boy36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: SLovenia-EU
COBB tuning

Intrestig parts:
http://www.cobbtuning.com/products/?id=3942
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #2  
Nsomniac's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 647
Likes: 39
From: South Dakota
Word. Anyone with past experience (obviously not on the X)?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Yes, for $695.00 you can buy a laptop and do it with EcuFlash It has gotten MUCH better (and more competitive) over the years, mainly because of EcuFlash. But seriously, if you already have a laptop, buy a 50 dollar cable and do it yourself on a nice piece of software.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
EvoX_SA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
The accessport would be awesome to have, but it isn't going to be out for awhile from what I hear. It is a good piece of equipment for amateurs and people who can tune. Because you can plug it in and download maps offliine or set it up yourself. Plus be able to go back to stock if needed.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #5  
Papi4baby's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: MD
psshhhh Cobb, dude they got the GTR AP out already while the evo 10 has been out longer. They are just about having their name held high.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 01:36 AM
  #6  
boy36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: SLovenia-EU
Originally Posted by EvoX_SA
The accessport would be awesome to have, but it isn't going to be out for awhile from what I hear. It is a good piece of equipment for amateurs and people who can tune. Because you can plug it in and download maps offliine or set it up yourself. Plus be able to go back to stock if needed.
+1
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #7  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Papi4baby
psshhhh Cobb, dude they got the GTR AP out already while the evo 10 has been out longer. They are just about having their name held high.
Actually, Cobb purchased and air shipped one of the very first JDM GTR's over here from Japan months and months ago to get a head start on the reflashing for the GTR market at a huge cost.

I have been working with Cobb for many years on Subarus and know that they always put in the time up front to make a world class and fully tested product before it is released.

While they were slow on releasing the Evo 8 AP product - now that it is out it offers features and functions which no other tool has - including live tuning, etc.

The Cobb name is only held high becuase they have a ton of great products and years of huge success with the Subaru AP which was and remains and revolutionary product.

Al
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #8  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by DynoFlash

While they were slow on releasing the Evo 8 AP product - now that it is out it offers features and functions which no other tool has - including live tuning, etc.
That is the only thing it offers over the other reflashing tools.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #9  
Rguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Va
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Actually, Cobb purchased and air shipped one of the very first JDM GTR's over here from Japan months and months ago to get a head start on the reflashing for the GTR market at a huge cost.

Al

Why couldnt they have done that for the Evo X?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 07:01 PM
  #10  
EvoX_SA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
it was explained to me that why there may be a demand for it in the Evo X, the GT-R is a more expensive car and the owners have the money to purchase the products at the price cobb sells them for instead Evo owners, who I am one of them are cheap to an extent and are alway slooking for a "good deal" and don't want to pay for the R&D. That how it was explained to me anyways, there is more money to make of the GTR for now.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
flyboytb's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Im in Reno trick.
perhaps they are having more issues with the mitsu over the GTR?

its silly to think a vendor/tuner would with hold a product (without reason) to upkeep a name...

in the end its about $$$$ you cant make money not selling a product. it will be out when they feel its ready for release im sure.

and is it the best form of Tuning... likely not. but it seems that downloading tunes and uploading them into the AP and then loading them into your car.

I have used this on a saab (the wrx wagon re badged) and it was awesome very easy to use and allowed for transition of multiple tunes IRT.

I had a tune for economy and for ***** to the walls (kinda lol)
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 08:25 AM
  #12  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by EvoX_SA
it was explained to me that why there may be a demand for it in the Evo X, the GT-R is a more expensive car and the owners have the money to purchase the products at the price cobb sells them for instead Evo owners, who I am one of them are cheap to an extent and are alway slooking for a "good deal" and don't want to pay for the R&D. That how it was explained to me anyways, there is more money to make of the GTR for now.
Not shooting the messanger here but this logic makes no sense financially. While it is true one could charge more $$ for a tune on a ~$80-100K car than on ~$40K car, the downside is there are much fewer GTR's to sell same than there are EVO X. I think that there will only be a total of 1500 GTR's entering the US in 08. Sport Compact displayed one, perhaps the only domestic model, in there next to last issue. At ~350 EVO X/month there are ~2800 currently owned in the US. So clearly the potentia GTR owners that want a tune will be very, very small relative to EVO X owners. In addition, breaking into the Nissan's ECU will take more of an effort than breaking into Fort Knox. According to others, Nissan has taken extra efforts to prevent tuners from cracking into the ECU. So I am confused with Cobbs rational unless they just wanted the car for themselves because this decision to focus on tunign the GTR rather than other more open access ECU's has me completely baffled!

Later, Ken
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #13  
EvoX_SA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
I know what your saying financially it wouldn't seem to make sense, but if you consider they had one of the first GTR's in the states they will have the parts before anyone else and offer one of the only tuning programs. Where as the
Evo x was on the market and a bunch of companies started to make parts for it. Plus look an what we will be able to tune the EVo with, Ecutek, TTPs Z-chip eventually, JESTR CHip, Open ECU, and then the AP. So I think it boils down to supply and demand. The more demand for a product with less supply means you can charge whatever you want. But when the supply is up, evo for instance, the demand is less and the price is dropped. Which we have seen a couple time between mail in flashes from a few other companies. The point is they have decided to dedicate there resources to the GTR and STi and not the evo x. They may be missing out on money, but it's their company.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #14  
Papi4baby's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by KPerez
Not shooting the messanger here but this logic makes no sense financially. While it is true one could charge more $$ for a tune on a ~$80-100K car than on ~$40K car, the downside is there are much fewer GTR's to sell same than there are EVO X. I think that there will only be a total of 1500 GTR's entering the US in 08. Sport Compact displayed one, perhaps the only domestic model, in there next to last issue. At ~350 EVO X/month there are ~2800 currently owned in the US. So clearly the potentia GTR owners that want a tune will be very, very small relative to EVO X owners. In addition, breaking into the Nissan's ECU will take more of an effort than breaking into Fort Knox. According to others, Nissan has taken extra efforts to prevent tuners from cracking into the ECU. So I am confused with Cobbs rational unless they just wanted the car for themselves because this decision to focus on tunign the GTR rather than other more open access ECU's has me completely baffled!

Later, Ken
Wow, that what i been saying. Oh well im sure the programmers and engineers at COBB know more.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #15  
evorx7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Eastern US
I think COBB may have missed the boat on the EVO X already. It seems that a lot of people on this forum already has had some ECU tuning and are very happy with the results. I don't think these people will pay for a different ECU tune again. I have faith and am still holding out for the Accessport. I loved mine on my STI. The Accessport is a great product and very versatile to boot.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 AM.