Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Suggestions for Access Port Evo X Install and Use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #46  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I have found the Cobb Evo X map to be much more on the agressive power side than the old Subaru tunes they had for many years. This is no doubt due to the more robust nature of the Evo X motor and its amazing ability to avoid knock. I am not sure how much of a fudge factor there is to mix and match parts with those base maps. Time will tell how they respond to additional parts.

Al
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #47  
dcasandman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
^^Al would you leave an AEM intake on the car or go back to stock if you where getting a custom tune? I have the Nisei Turbo Inlet that will stay, but I can put the stock box back on.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #48  
Papi4baby's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
100% correct you can use any drop in filter with the stock calibrations as a drop in filter has no effect on the air flow sensor reading. However a intake change often requires remaping.
AL does that apply to all the models and base map. aka 93 oct GSR and MR, and 91oct GSR? Thanks.

Also did you see what i posted about target boost, it mentioned that it would have to be adjusted mechanically? would that be the WGA nut?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #49  
chase123's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I wouldn't adjust any boost settings unless you have a real boost guage. The 18.29 psi reading from AP seems to be clipping and therefore is not correct.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #50  
Papi4baby's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by chase123
I wouldn't adjust any boost settings unless you have a real boost guage. The 18.29 psi reading from AP seems to be clipping and therefore is not correct.
thanks for the info, i will give COBB a call and i guess i'll do a 3rd pull see what the logger says mine is doing.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #51  
Christian.'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: SLC
Originally Posted by chase123
I wouldn't adjust any boost settings unless you have a real boost guage. The 18.29 psi reading from AP seems to be clipping and therefore is not correct.
I found this bug on Friday and I have reported to our engineering team. We should hopefully have a firmware update to correct this issue shortly. Ahead of time, thank you for your patience.

Christian.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #52  
Japistani's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Calgary/Edmonton, AB
Unhappy

Originally Posted by DynoFlash
What intake do you have and what octane fuel do you use ? I am working very quicklly on supporting as many parts as I can with email maps.
Dynoflash... thanks for the reply... it's the AEM CAI (21-678), and I use 91 Octane fuel, as that seems to be the only kind I can get up here... That's my only mod so far, although I am considering a Buschur exhaust, with a quiet muffler... so, just to confirm, if I get it tuned with just the intake... it'll be fine... until I decide to add the exhaust, and then I have to get it professionally tuned again (everytime I add something?)

It'll be really unfortunate if I have to sit and look at that Accessport (even just for a couple days), and can't install it for fear of blowing up my motor or something... I wish I would have known about this prior to purchasing it...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #53  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
I've done real back to back tests with the HKS drop in filter and every time it has leaned the car out .3-.4

The last HKS drop in made 20whp/15wtq just by dropping it in on a stock 10.

I also did a test where I tuned the 10 with the stock air filter, dialed in the AFR and then I put in the HKS drop-in filter and the car leaned out .3 but only gained 6whp. Big difference in power from un-tuned to tune.

Either way the filter leans the car out from taking out the restriction of the stock paper filter.

YMMV

I'll try to remember to find the charts this week.

Last edited by razorlab; Dec 6, 2008 at 10:04 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #54  
Papi4baby's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: MD
Just spoke to Shawn at COBB, and the max psi it still @ 18, they are working on it. I was told that it appears to be a limitation with the actual part, but they should have a fix for it. Just in case anyone is wondering if you car is only boosting 18psi.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #55  
Q15H's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Just spoke to Shawn at COBB, and the max psi it still @ 18, they are working on it. I was told that it appears to be a limitation with the actual part, but they should have a fix for it. Just in case anyone is wondering if you car is only boosting 18psi.
Might as well get them to look at the Load value peaking at 4801.1 also.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #56  
LVSBB6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: CAN
Great info! Looking at the power gains it seems like the filter would lean out ALOT more on a stock map vs a tuned map.

I would say the same theory also applies to other aftermarket intakes that only replaces the filter box of the intake. But not the ones replacing the MAF housing which tricks the airflow sensor reading.

Originally Posted by razorlab
I've done real back to back tests with the HKS drop in filter and every time it has leaned the car out .3-.4

The last HKS drop in made 20whp/15wtq just by dropping it in on a stock 10.

I also did a test where I tuned the 10 with the stock air filter, dialed in the AFR and then I put in the HKS drop-in filter and the car leaned out .3 but only gained 6whp. Big difference in power from un-tuned to tune.

Either way the filter leans the car out from taking out the restriction of the stock paper filter.

YMMV

I'll try to remember to find the charts this week.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #57  
Japistani's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Calgary/Edmonton, AB
Hello Everyone... I finally decided to try my Accessport, as I haven't been able to get an answer from Cobb... I tried the Stage 1 tune for a short run to the store and back and I'm pretty sure I could feel the difference... could have been the placebo effect, but, I'll know tomorrow for sure...

I looked through all the Live Data settings, as I was hoping to monitor the AFR, because, from what I understand, this is the issue when running an AEM CAI and the Accessport Stage 1, but, I don't know what to be watching, and what I should be looking for in terms of results...

If someone here in the forums could please help me, it would be greatly appreciated... otherwise, I guess I might unmarry this thing, and it'll be up for sale... that would be a shame though....

Any responses would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #58  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Japistani
Hello Everyone... I finally decided to try my Accessport, as I haven't been able to get an answer from Cobb... I tried the Stage 1 tune for a short run to the store and back and I'm pretty sure I could feel the difference... could have been the placebo effect, but, I'll know tomorrow for sure...

I looked through all the Live Data settings, as I was hoping to monitor the AFR, because, from what I understand, this is the issue when running an AEM CAI and the Accessport Stage 1, but, I don't know what to be watching, and what I should be looking for in terms of results...

If someone here in the forums could please help me, it would be greatly appreciated... otherwise, I guess I might unmarry this thing, and it'll be up for sale... that would be a shame though....

Any responses would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
You cannot monitor/log AFR without a wideband AFR sensor. Currently you won't be able to log that via the AccessPort either.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #59  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Japistani
Hello Everyone... I finally decided to try my Accessport, as I haven't been able to get an answer from Cobb... I tried the Stage 1 tune for a short run to the store and back and I'm pretty sure I could feel the difference... could have been the placebo effect, but, I'll know tomorrow for sure...

I looked through all the Live Data settings, as I was hoping to monitor the AFR, because, from what I understand, this is the issue when running an AEM CAI and the Accessport Stage 1, but, I don't know what to be watching, and what I should be looking for in terms of results...

If someone here in the forums could please help me, it would be greatly appreciated... otherwise, I guess I might unmarry this thing, and it'll be up for sale... that would be a shame though....

Any responses would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
It is no placebo effect my friend - the AP Stage I map has been doccumented to make a solid 30 whp gain

Al
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #60  
Rob@cobbtuning's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 1
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by Japistani
Hello Everyone... I finally decided to try my Accessport, as I haven't been able to get an answer from Cobb... I tried the Stage 1 tune for a short run to the store and back and I'm pretty sure I could feel the difference... could have been the placebo effect, but, I'll know tomorrow for sure...

I looked through all the Live Data settings, as I was hoping to monitor the AFR, because, from what I understand, this is the issue when running an AEM CAI and the Accessport Stage 1, but, I don't know what to be watching, and what I should be looking for in terms of results...

If someone here in the forums could please help me, it would be greatly appreciated... otherwise, I guess I might unmarry this thing, and it'll be up for sale... that would be a shame though....

Any responses would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Hi Japistani,

The best way to get a hold of Cobb would be to call. We have a few very knowledgeable guys on the phones and email. (801)713-0035

To answer your question the AEM intake is going to lean out your fueling. The AP is also going to lean out your fueling. Combining the two modifications with our current OTS maps may not be optimal for what the motor wants.

There are a couple of solutions.
1. Work with a tuner to get a custom tune addressing how the AEM intake affects the fueling on the vehicle. I believe Jon@HB speed runs a AEM intake and should have a tune ready to go. That being said, I'm sure Al or any of our other tuners would be happy to help out as well.
2. Replace the intake with the stock airbox for now. Your power increases from the AP will far out way the intake. It's free and worth a try We are considering releasing a OTS tune specific for out customers with AEM intakes. It's not for sure, but is very heavily being considered.

Either way we are more than happy to help get you running optimally with your current modifications. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Thanks,
Rob
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 PM.