Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Stopping the fuel trims affecting WOT fueling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 04:57 AM
  #121  
acamus's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 3
From: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
5304007 @ 3e320
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 05:12 AM
  #122  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
isn't it 0x3ea64?

i havn't got the rom in front of me just my XML - so i might be wong!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 05:31 AM
  #123  
YaroRS's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
3e320 seems to be the correct one. 3ea64 shows FFFFF and other garbage
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 02:26 PM
  #124  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
good job!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 11:42 PM
  #125  
YaroRS's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
is it a good idea to run the car in open loop all the time, just incase this "disable" method would not work ? Any downsides from running it in openloop all the time ?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #126  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Has any one tried this fuel trim disable method on the 2010 USDM Evo X GSR, romid 55570005?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 04:18 PM
  #127  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
it should work just fine.

same code section references the same address...
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #128  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by tephra
it should work just fine.

same code section references the same address...
Thank you sir...I just read your knock thread...Damn that must have been scary to hear. I was tuning an Evo 9 once that knocked to 36 counts due to a failing fuel pump. Scared the crap out of me. I hope the HFC was the source of the problem.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #129  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah not sure.

maybe a combination of factors - but it still doesn't totally add up...

i'm going to put it back in this weekend, see what happens
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 09:29 AM
  #130  
cpunlamd's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: NJ
All these numbers are making me crazy. WTH is going on in here!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #131  
camaropower88's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
regardless of how the st and lt fuel trims are affected...during WOT operation the computer goes into open loop operation which means it is ignoring the o2 sensor and IS NOT GOING TO MAKE A ST/LT FUEL TRIM CORRECTION if your car runs like **** during WOT operation either your car is not coming out of closed loop operation like it should or you have a fuel delivery problem that is restricting fuel under serious load conditions. There is no reason to change your fuel trims for performance.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #132  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by camaropower88
regardless of how the st and lt fuel trims are affected...during WOT operation the computer goes into open loop operation which means it is ignoring the o2 sensor and IS NOT GOING TO MAKE A ST/LT FUEL TRIM CORRECTION if your car runs like **** during WOT operation either your car is not coming out of closed loop operation like it should or you have a fuel delivery problem that is restricting fuel under serious load conditions. There is no reason to change your fuel trims for performance.
Actually that is incorrect on the Evo 10, the LTFT is taken into account at WOT fueling unless you do this "mod". Regardless of open/closed loop operation.

Think of it as a "trim" off the fuel map. Example if you LTFT is -2, it will run that much leaner then your fuel map at WOT if you still have the factory trim hz settings.

The 8 and 9 did this as well but was not as sensitive to it as the Evo 10 is.

I suggest you do a little more research before making first posts like this.

- bryan
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 09:55 AM
  #133  
newcomer81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk VA
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
I suggest you do a little more research before making first posts like this.
but 9 pages is tltr
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #134  
camaropower88's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
unless your car is from the planet Jupiter, the PCM is not going to look at fuel trim during WOT, on a scan tool fuel trim numbers are going to change, but the PCM is not worried about where the FT is at. The last time i checked fuel trim is used for fuel correction based off multiple PCM input sensors only during closed loop operation. Modded or not i hope to God your computer is not making corrections on fuel trim at WOT. You obviously are obilvious to open/closed loop operation. During open loop your computer ignores o2 sensor input, i dont give a damn what you say. Why do you think a car runs in open loop when the car is cold?? Because a cold car needs a Richer A/F ratio and it does NOT want the o2 sensor to pick up on it and make a fuel correction. Same crap during WOT when you go WOT you go lean at first but then a very rich A/F ratio, you do not want the PCM to correct that either so the PCM does not look at the o2. No o2 sensor = no fuel correction. and first post or post 23902392032039 who gives a ****. So instead of flaming me and tearing me apart, just tell me where you get the idea that your car still looks at FT during WOT. if your car really did look at FT during WOT you would not be doin this "mod" you would be callin up the lemon law hotline cause your car would be running like absolute garbage.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #135  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Do you realize you are arguing with one of the best evo tuners around (GST)? I agree at WOT, the car goes into open loop, and the fuel trims do not change. However, the last saved long-term fuel trim does in fact get used to alter the fuel map tables in open loop. For example, if your LTFT is at -5%, then your open-loop fueling will be 5% leaner than the fuel map tables would normally indicate. This has been verified by numerous tuners and end users for the evo x, hence why this thread exists.

Also, if implemented correctly (such that it were more stable), having fuel trim affect WOT operation does make sense in some contexts. For example, some parts of the country will switch between E0 and E10 fuel during various parts of the year. If the car learns that the recent fuel makes the car run leaner than expected, then long-term fuel trim will be positive. This will then cause WOT fueling to be richer than normal to compensate for the leaner burning fuel.

Last edited by LaXGSR; Jun 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 PM.