ID1300 Scaling / Latency
#1
ID1300 Scaling / Latency
Haven't seen data posted about these injectors like I have for many others. What are people ending up with for scaling and latencies?
I just reinstalled mine last night after chasing some fuel issues and taking the car back to as stock as possible to verify and fine tuned my MAF scaling again on stock injectors.
So now its time to get mine dialed in again provided they were not a big contributor to my original issues which after last nights initial testing I am feeling may actually be a possibility.
I just reinstalled mine last night after chasing some fuel issues and taking the car back to as stock as possible to verify and fine tuned my MAF scaling again on stock injectors.
So now its time to get mine dialed in again provided they were not a big contributor to my original issues which after last nights initial testing I am feeling may actually be a possibility.
#3
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: with you mom...!
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mine on e85 are as followed scaling 770,battery latency top to bottom 3.810, 3.405, 1.830, 1.245, 0.945, 0.705, 0.540
pump gas scaling is 1125 battery latency is the same as above
pump gas scaling is 1125 battery latency is the same as above
Last edited by jessej; Apr 24, 2014 at 07:46 PM.
#4
I was given them scaling numbers to try and they definitely don't even come close for me...
As of right now I am on
Scaling - 1044
Latency:
3.615
3.195
1.620
1.035
0.780
0.555
0.390
And this has gotten me fairly close with my log on the way to work this morning showing idle about -1.5 to -2% and cruise about +3 to +5%.
I've tried scaling from 1218 (idle is almost perfect cruise very positive +10% or more) down to 1008 (cruise is almost perfect idle is very negative like 9-10% or more where the trims completely stop) and latencies from what you are using down to what I have currently.
My MAF is scaled about as perfect as you can ever get with a +/- 1.75% or less from idle to cruise over several days of logging and some temperature swings so the issue is isolated to the injectors only.
#6
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: with you mom...!
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here ya go let me know if this helps at all. Base latency is 0 out, i didn't have to adjust the cold start tabs till i switched to E85
Last edited by jessej; Apr 25, 2014 at 09:01 PM.
#7
So your pulse width adder is stock and the only tuning needed was the scaling and latencies for these to work on pump gas, correct? E85 I'd expect for the cold start to need some adjustments.
I initiated a trouble ticket with Injector Dynamics and they told me not to worry what the numbers are since stock ecu was reverse engineered, MAF is aftermarket, and there was no pulse width adder table so no way to tell whats really going on. I responded with my concern that my scaling is now at 1008 and latencies (shown below) to close the gap between idle and cruise are a lot lower than what others are successfully using, my MAF was dialed in perfectly, and I have a pulse width adder table defined that I can tune.
Current latencies:
3.6
3.18
1.605
1.02
0.765
0.54
0.375
Also this point that was said:
Also, the ID1300's are in a slightly non linear area at idle, very predictable, but it's non linear and in an ecu without low pulse width linearization tables, it will cause the offset to seem skewed (the other way though, the offset that works correctly at idle will be higher than our spec when you're in the non linear area).
Your latencies match what I was given from a well known and trusted tuner except the scaling was at 1218. All this really makes me question my injectors...
Trending Topics
#9
I've been in contact with Injector Dynamics further and have gotten a little more information from them. I'm also awaiting some Low Pulse Width Adder table information that should be able to drop right in based on base fuel pressure.
Also according to ID the Minimum IPW is 1.1ms:
The minimum IPW that the ID1300s can be accurately controlled is about 1.1 msec. Below this, they are in a non-linear range.
#11
How are your trims with AC on vs off? I still get some pretty crazy swings both ways at times when AC is on but when off trims stay consistent. This has made me bump the MAF scaling a touch...
It's at a point the trims always work vs the scenario where they would flat-line after a while and car would idle in the 11's.
Have you played with the Low Pulse Width table any?
My current scaling and latencies I've been running for some time now are below.
Scaling - 1008
Latency:
3.615
3.195
1.620
1.035
0.780
0.555
0.390
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raceghost
ECU Flash
22
Jun 1, 2016 12:30 AM
illogicalmind
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
2
Nov 16, 2014 05:56 AM