Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

ID1300 Scaling / Latency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2014, 07:18 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ID1300 Scaling / Latency

Haven't seen data posted about these injectors like I have for many others. What are people ending up with for scaling and latencies?

I just reinstalled mine last night after chasing some fuel issues and taking the car back to as stock as possible to verify and fine tuned my MAF scaling again on stock injectors.

So now its time to get mine dialed in again provided they were not a big contributor to my original issues which after last nights initial testing I am feeling may actually be a possibility.
Old Apr 24, 2014, 02:30 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Bump.

Slowly dialing them in and the scaling and latencies are so far much lower than advertised and looks like it will take even less to get them close.
Old Apr 24, 2014, 07:39 PM
  #3  
Newbie
 
jessej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: with you mom...!
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mine on e85 are as followed scaling 770,battery latency top to bottom 3.810, 3.405, 1.830, 1.245, 0.945, 0.705, 0.540
pump gas scaling is 1125 battery latency is the same as above

Last edited by jessej; Apr 24, 2014 at 07:46 PM.
Old Apr 25, 2014, 04:40 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jessej
mine on e85 are as followed scaling 770,battery latency top to bottom 3.810, 3.405, 1.830, 1.245, 0.945, 0.705, 0.540
pump gas scaling is 1125 battery latency is the same as above
Thank you for the reply!

I was given them scaling numbers to try and they definitely don't even come close for me...

As of right now I am on

Scaling - 1044

Latency:
3.615
3.195
1.620
1.035
0.780
0.555
0.390

And this has gotten me fairly close with my log on the way to work this morning showing idle about -1.5 to -2% and cruise about +3 to +5%.

I've tried scaling from 1218 (idle is almost perfect cruise very positive +10% or more) down to 1008 (cruise is almost perfect idle is very negative like 9-10% or more where the trims completely stop) and latencies from what you are using down to what I have currently.

My MAF is scaled about as perfect as you can ever get with a +/- 1.75% or less from idle to cruise over several days of logging and some temperature swings so the issue is isolated to the injectors only.
Old Apr 25, 2014, 01:41 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jessej
mine on e85 are as followed scaling 770,battery latency top to bottom 3.810, 3.405, 1.830, 1.245, 0.945, 0.705, 0.540
pump gas scaling is 1125 battery latency is the same as above
Do you have access to the Low Pulse Width IPW Adder table and is it modified from stock?

Mind posting it if so?
Old Apr 25, 2014, 08:56 PM
  #6  
Newbie
 
jessej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: with you mom...!
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by itzwolf
Do you have access to the Low Pulse Width IPW Adder table and is it modified from stock?

Mind posting it if so?

here ya go let me know if this helps at all. Base latency is 0 out, i didn't have to adjust the cold start tabs till i switched to E85
Attached Thumbnails ID1300 Scaling / Latency-screenshot-2014-04-25-05.59.06.jpg  

Last edited by jessej; Apr 25, 2014 at 09:01 PM.
Old Apr 26, 2014, 11:14 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jessej
here ya go let me know if this helps at all. Base latency is 0 out, i didn't have to adjust the cold start tabs till i switched to E85
Again thank you for sharing!

So your pulse width adder is stock and the only tuning needed was the scaling and latencies for these to work on pump gas, correct? E85 I'd expect for the cold start to need some adjustments.

I initiated a trouble ticket with Injector Dynamics and they told me not to worry what the numbers are since stock ecu was reverse engineered, MAF is aftermarket, and there was no pulse width adder table so no way to tell whats really going on. I responded with my concern that my scaling is now at 1008 and latencies (shown below) to close the gap between idle and cruise are a lot lower than what others are successfully using, my MAF was dialed in perfectly, and I have a pulse width adder table defined that I can tune.

Current latencies:

3.6
3.18
1.605
1.02
0.765
0.54
0.375

Also this point that was said:

Also, the ID1300's are in a slightly non linear area at idle, very predictable, but it's non linear and in an ecu without low pulse width linearization tables, it will cause the offset to seem skewed (the other way though, the offset that works correctly at idle will be higher than our spec when you're in the non linear area).
Goes totally against the fact my latencies are significantly lower than their published numbers when that statement says they would be higher.

Your latencies match what I was given from a well known and trusted tuner except the scaling was at 1218. All this really makes me question my injectors...
Old May 16, 2014, 01:19 AM
  #8  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
IFuXwiTuZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Usa
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is what i have mine set to (might not be perfect but work good for me)
93 octane
ID1300 Hi-Z

1170

Battery Voltage
4.6875
7.03125
9.375
11.71875
14.0625
16.40625
18.6767578125

latency
3.312
1.68
1.032
0.864
0.624
0.456
0.336
Old May 16, 2014, 04:42 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by IFuXwiTuZ
This is what i have mine set to (might not be perfect but work good for me)
93 octane
ID1300 Hi-Z

1170

Battery Voltage
4.6875
7.03125
9.375
11.71875
14.0625
16.40625
18.6767578125

latency
3.312
1.68
1.032
0.864
0.624
0.456
0.336
Interesting so your latencies are even lower than what I was using but scaling is higher. That is for an Evo X correct, because your profile says drives 2006 Evo. What are your trims floating at and stock MAF or aftermarket?

I've been in contact with Injector Dynamics further and have gotten a little more information from them. I'm also awaiting some Low Pulse Width Adder table information that should be able to drop right in based on base fuel pressure.

Also according to ID the Minimum IPW is 1.1ms:

The minimum IPW that the ID1300s can be accurately controlled is about 1.1 msec. Below this, they are in a non-linear range.
Old Aug 3, 2014, 09:15 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
chetrickerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 575
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here is my scaling and latency. The left scaling is 91 and the right is E85. The fuel pressure is set exactly at 43 psi. The fuel trims stay between -1 and +1
Attached Thumbnails ID1300 Scaling / Latency-id1300-scaling-latency.jpg  
Old Aug 4, 2014, 04:17 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chetrickerman
Here is my scaling and latency. The left scaling is 91 and the right is E85. The fuel pressure is set exactly at 43 psi. The fuel trims stay between -1 and +1
Thanks Chet.

How are your trims with AC on vs off? I still get some pretty crazy swings both ways at times when AC is on but when off trims stay consistent. This has made me bump the MAF scaling a touch...

It's at a point the trims always work vs the scenario where they would flat-line after a while and car would idle in the 11's.

Have you played with the Low Pulse Width table any?

My current scaling and latencies I've been running for some time now are below.

Scaling - 1008

Latency:
3.615
3.195
1.620
1.035
0.780
0.555
0.390
Old Aug 4, 2014, 07:04 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
chetrickerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 575
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't have a/c

I haven't had to mess with the low pulse width table very much
Old Aug 4, 2014, 09:17 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chetrickerman
I don't have a/c

I haven't had to mess with the low pulse width table very much
Ahh darn. Well nice to see your latencies are identical to mine where it counts. I can't give up AC, Florida = to damn hot and this is my daily.
Old Sep 1, 2014, 11:39 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Deannn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia - Perth
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you get it sorted? im having issues too specially with aircon on it leans right out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast_Freddie
ECU Flash
309
Oct 30, 2023 01:56 AM
illogicalmind
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
2
Nov 16, 2014 05:56 AM
jrod740
ECU Flash
3
Feb 9, 2014 09:49 PM
crimson red
ECU Flash
11
Jan 20, 2012 08:15 PM



Quick Reply: ID1300 Scaling / Latency



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 AM.