Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

quietest 3.25" or 3.5" muffler available?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
evostang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
quietest 3.25" or 3.5" muffler available?

Once the intake tube and cone filter adapter (CAI) in my other thread are done (prob this week or next weekend), I'm going to begin working on an exhaust. It seems like all the shops are running 3" tubing. I'll probably run 3.25" or 3.5" tubing.

I'm getting old(er) and don't really care for ultra loud exhaust systems anymore. I'm looking for input on an off the shelf muffler which is very free flowing and still quiet. I can build a muffler from perforated tubing, stainless wire mesh, and ceramic insulation sheeting, but it's a whole lot of work.

In the past I have run Walker Dynomax Super Hemi Turbo mufflers, because they are very quiet and very free flowing. However, I have only ever found them in 2.5" diameters, and the muffler is physically huge. I could run two in parallel, but then the mufflers would be twice as huge and I don't really want to deal with that.

Has anyone seen a published Sound Pressure Level test on a variety or import style mufflers? Is there a link?
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 07:52 AM
  #2  
Evolution Marin's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Nor. Cal.
Wink You Might Consider This.

This seems like a "best of both worlds" solution to your needs.

http://xforce.com.au.tmp.anchor.net.au/cars/view_car/29
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #3  
DC_TypeR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: CA
Why is it you want to run 3.25 or 3.5" tubing?

In my own 'personal opinion'... I think 3.25 or 3.5 is to big for a stockish setup
(500whp and below).

3" is good enough for 650-750whp if i'm not mistaken.
3" (parts, tubing, resonators, and mufflers) are also more commonly on the shelf items, so it would be easier to source.

I will not knock you for doing it, in fact I would incourage you, just to see how a 3.25 or 3.5" exhaust would react on a X vs a straight 3" setup.

I've tried magnaflow mufflers and with a resonator or two... you don't notice you even have an exhaust.. On a full street set up w/ 2 resonators and a hi-flow cat sound levels are under 89dbs at idle up to about 4k rpms.

Just my .02 cents, Good luck!

-Chris
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #4  
madfast's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: tsukuba turn 4
magnaflow ftw magnaflows for the most part don't sound ricey
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
You've got to work on thinking in Evo instead of thinking in Mustang.

On a serious note, no shops make a system that big for an X that I am aware of. You'd be best off looking into a complete custom job if you really wanted to do it. IMO, nobody here is going to know of a good 3.5" I.D. muffler. Even then, there won't be any gains using a muffler or piping that big, only possibile clearance issues.

There have been a couple of low 10 second Evos (VIIIs and IXs) run through the shop with a built stroker motor and either a 35R or a 37R running a full 3" system.

If you want something quiet under normal driving, look into a cut out or even a dump tube for the least restricted flow. Good luck.
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 03:47 PM
  #6  
meat_EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: VaBeach
just use 2 resonator mufflers before the last muffler. wont hurt flow that bad and will sound quite as a DD and still nasty at redline!
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #7  
evostang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
650 whp sounds like an awful lot for a 3" system. I guess it depends on the backpressure through the system though. My "Mustang" (still thinking in Mustang terms) put down 880 rwhp through a 3.5" system and the backpressure was pretty high. I vaguely remember it was around 3 psi through a full length exhaust pipe with no muffler. That was 2003 though, and I don't remember the details very well anymore.

I was figuring I would try a larger tubing to see if it works any better, but without a 3" system to compare it to, who knows. Also, I can't see that it will hurt either, so why not? I planned on building the whole system myself, and I estimate the tubing will run about $220-$250. If I have to run vbands the total will be higher, but I don't know if I will have to. I suspect tubing of that diameter will not work with the factory flanges.

I made a bung adapter a couple weeks ago in order to test backpressure through the factory system. It's basically an old O2 sensor which I cut apart, and welded in an NPT adapter. In that NPT adapter I installed a bronze NPT to 1/4" flare fitting. From here I can run a 1/4" copper tube to a pressure gauge and see measure the backpressure through the system, behind the wideband bung I installed in the downpipe. It's simple and ugly but it works fine, and I've used similar items in the past.

I'm also curious to hear the difference between "thinking in Evo" and "thinking in Mustang". I thought in Mustang from 1989 through 2004, and it's hard to break old habits.
Attached Thumbnails quietest 3.25" or 3.5" muffler available?-adapter.jpg  

Last edited by evostang; May 18, 2008 at 06:55 PM.
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #8  
evorx7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Eastern US
Very curious to see what the backpressure is on a stock Evo X. Even greater if you upgrade exhaust in the future and run another test and compare the results.
Thanks for your effort.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FERNO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
295
Jan 30, 2012 10:31 AM
cparker7
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
11
Aug 7, 2010 01:45 AM
Steve_P
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
5
Feb 28, 2010 04:37 PM
riceball777
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
15
Dec 19, 2006 07:25 PM
shadow1
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Apr 18, 2005 07:10 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:14 PM.