Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Evo X bolt on Garrett GT30R turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #151  
Philthy748's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Seems like a great option - looking forward for data and results.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 04:55 AM
  #152  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by EM@WORKS
We've been hearing that there is supposed to be a online seminar with live feedback regarding this turbo kit possibly the end of next month held by Garrett and some partners.
We are in the group that was selected for this virtual tuner program..... Our gt3076R should be arriving anyday, and we will be testing it...

looks promising... there is he 3076R with .94 and 3071R in the smaller hotside... In contrast to what many people think, I feel the 3076R will still need to see 25psi to make big numbers... the 3071R is obviously going to be a little more responsive...

we use the 3071R cart on subarus and its a torque monster....

we are excited to be working with garrett on this.

cb
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 05:14 AM
  #153  
aftershock141's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Do you think there will be any issues with boost creep since its internally gated?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 07:57 AM
  #154  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by CBRD
In contrast to what many people think, I feel the 3076R will still need to see 25psi to make big numbers... the 3071R is obviously going to be a little more responsive...
You'll definitely need to boost up to ~24-25psi to make some 'big' numbers. My estimation is about 425-450whp on pump with all the typical bolt-ons plus cams. This is based on AMS making 450whp on a GT35 with no cams.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 05:11 AM
  #155  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by spdracerut
You'll definitely need to boost up to ~24-25psi to make some 'big' numbers. My estimation is about 425-450whp on pump with all the typical bolt-ons plus cams. This is based on AMS making 450whp on a GT35 with no cams.
i dont think 450whp is realistic on our dyno on pump.... at all.....

consider a standard 35R evo 8/9 makes around 400wp on our dyno on pump, and the torque SUCKS!!!

we will see.... i love the X and im confident great things will come from the platform.

cb
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:19 PM
  #156  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by CBRD
i dont think 450whp is realistic on our dyno on pump.... at all.....

consider a standard 35R evo 8/9 makes around 400wp on our dyno on pump, and the torque SUCKS!!!

cb
Yeah... I just saw a chart from your dyno, probably not going to happen on yours!!!

Maybe on Buschur's.... but any dyno that shows about 250whp stock, I think the 3076 will do 425-450whp. Buschur hit just over 400whp with the Blouch turbo, so I think 425whp seems quite possible on his with the 3076. I guess we'll find out at some point!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 01:04 AM
  #157  
Boostd4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I just received my 3076R in the mail today...I'll be posting #s within the next 2 weeks.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 02:19 AM
  #158  
Juju702's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Nice cant wait for results^^^^
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:05 AM
  #159  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
CBRD, 350 pump and 420 race on your dyno would be enough for me to start saving pennies for one of these suckers.

I'd hope for more, but hotside and exit using the stock DP and the internal gate makes me think power will be less than what I want it to be.

Last edited by Noize; Apr 26, 2009 at 06:07 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:06 AM
  #160  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Any word on the boost creep?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:11 AM
  #161  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
I'm not going to mess with the internals of mine for a while since I think 500-550 crank HP is going to be plenty, but I bet someone will try and cram bigger wheels into this housing sooner or later as well. I'm still assembling the supporting mods for the turbo and due to some track days in late May I won't tackle the install until early June. Rest assurred I'll be posting full dyno plots and quarter mile numbers as soon as I get them.

The goal is 400 whp on STM's Mustang Dyno (reads similar to Buschur's heartbreaker) running 25-26 PSI boost on pump. Chances are I may still have to add cams, extrude honed intake manifold, and/or race gas at 29-30 PSI to do it but it will get done. :P
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:16 AM
  #162  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by Noize
I'd hope for more, but hotside and exit using the stock DP and the internal gate makes me think power will be less than what I want it to be.
I'm going with a tubular exhaust manifold or ported/extrude honed manifold plus an O2/Downpipe combo to make sure flow in and out is as good as it can be. As for boost creep I would imagine that running 25-26 PSI it should be fine since you aren't trying to dump as much boost. Possibly there would be some creep if you tried to run the turbo at lower boost levels but with a high flow O2 or external dump it shouldn't climb past mid 20's, only one way to find out!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:19 AM
  #163  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
I have an O2DP, but doesn't it mate to the stock DP, making an O2 downpipe useless?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:27 AM
  #164  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Originally Posted by Noize
I have an O2DP, but doesn't it mate to the stock DP, making an O2 downpipe useless?
If the stock downpipe and the o2 downpipe both fit stock, they should both fit anything else that mates to the stock downpipe.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 08:19 AM
  #165  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Boostd4
I just received my 3076R in the mail today...I'll be posting #s within the next 2 weeks.
So, what's your impression of it so far? At least based on appearance and packaging
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 AM.