Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Evo X bolt on Garrett GT30R turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #361  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by GSXR
Hmmm, this is interesting. The boost pill should be a good thing. It should be a larger size so you'll be able to hold more boost up top.
The boost pill is a smaller size than stock. The turbo has to work harder to generate more boost to overcome the resistance of the smaller hole in the pill. A larger hole in the pill will bring down the boost.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #362  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by spdracerut
UK 99 octane is roughly 93-94 octane here in the states right?

Looks like it only spooled about 500rpm slower than the stock turbo? That's even better than I thought!
Looking at the chart peak stock tq was achieved at ~3500 rpm. The peak tq for the 3076 was achieved at ~4600 rpm. That is 1100 rpm later than stock. That would have an impact on daily driving.

What would the peak tq rpm be with the 3071?
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #363  
ScottSpeed21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 624
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by nj1266
Looking at the chart peak stock tq was achieved at ~3500 rpm. The peak tq for the 3076 was achieved at ~4600 rpm. That is 1100 rpm later than stock. That would have an impact on daily driving.

What would the peak tq rpm be with the 3071?
It's not about comparing peak torque, look at both curves at the same rpm. at ~3500rpm the stock turbo peaks at ~270 ft/lbs. The 3076R does spool slightly slower, but matches ~270 ft/lbs at 3500rpm like the stock turbo, and the torque just keeps climbing from there.

That's not too bad, but I also agree with you, I'd like to see how the 3071R spools and how much power it's capable of.

Last edited by ScottSpeed21; May 27, 2009 at 01:50 PM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #364  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by nj1266
Looking at the chart peak stock tq was achieved at ~3500 rpm. The peak tq for the 3076 was achieved at ~4600 rpm. That is 1100 rpm later than stock. That would have an impact on daily driving.

What would the peak tq rpm be with the 3071?
Peak torque is significantly later, but the 3076 hits the ~210 lb-ft roughly 500rpm after the stock turbo. I choose this point as it's when both turbos are spooling and it's easy to read on the graph

The 3076 matches the stock torque at ~3500 rpms. So anywhere above 3500, you're making more power. Not too bad.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #365  
sbdemon's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
This is just the first chart try not to over-analyze it. It is just one example of this turbo on one car. Who knows what power/spool characteristics tuners are going to be able to get once they have mroe experience tuning it.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #366  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Originally Posted by nj1266
The boost pill is a smaller size than stock. The turbo has to work harder to generate more boost to overcome the resistance of the smaller hole in the pill. A larger hole in the pill will bring down the boost.
Then why does cobb require you to take out the boost pill in order to run stage 2 boost levels?
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:38 PM
  #367  
HB Speed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Originally Posted by Excalibur
Then why does cobb require you to take out the boost pill in order to run stage 2 boost levels?
because the pill cobb has you remove is a DIFFERENT PILL than what he is talking about
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #368  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by Excalibur
Then why does cobb require you to take out the boost pill in order to run stage 2 boost levels?
different pill.

^^crap, got beat to the submit button
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:41 PM
  #369  
HB Speed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Originally Posted by nj1266
The boost pill is a smaller size than stock. The turbo has to work harder to generate more boost to overcome the resistance of the smaller hole in the pill. A larger hole in the pill will bring down the boost.
actually the Pill is a restrictor so that the WG sees less boost pressure therefore increasing the boost!
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #370  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Originally Posted by HB Speed
because the pill cobb has you remove is a DIFFERENT PILL than what he is talking about
My bad. Just trying to understand everything.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #371  
evo400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: The big wide world
Originally Posted by sbdemon
This is just the first chart try not to over-analyze it. It is just one example of this turbo on one car. Who knows what power/spool characteristics tuners are going to be able to get once they have mroe experience tuning it.

As I said to start with this was a bone stock actuator . Had we fitted the 1.4 bar uprated units we have , 500/525hp would of been a very easy target , this car has had 6 visits to the dyno with many stages of tune with lots of new development parts ,the garrett is a stunning modification to upgrade too !. Turbo speeds show us the turbo is just cruzing in real terms ,the fact 1.6 bar yeilds 480hp is just a small incited to the 4B's power making potential .
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #372  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by J5isalive2
This isn't a normal 30r. it is a twin scroll built specifically for the Evo X. If the turbo can't hold boost up top then garrett didn't do their job. Garrett spent a lot of money to produce this turbo seeing that it is car specific and i doubt they let a fact of holding boost up top slip past their R&D team...
Originally Posted by evo400
Boost control on theses new turbos is a little strange as far as the pre load required to hold boost is higher than seen on the stock evo x turbo system .The wastegate valves is a larger diameter and is requiring more preload .

The graph show a stock car on V-power 99 octane UK fuel and also the first tune on the new Garrett GT3076R . On the stock actuator with as much preload as possible it peaked at 1.8 bar droppping to just 1.55bar at peak power . This motor and turbo are very very efficent and are working very well from turbo speeds we logged with the Motec.
Somehow I told you so wouldn't work!



Garrett did there job perfectly, if you want 30 psi at 8500 you wanta 35r, not a 30R. Making a 30R evox friendly was about making it fit, given the constrictions of space, inlet, and outlet, and they did it very well.



Scorke
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #373  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by nj1266
Looking at the chart peak stock tq was achieved at ~3500 rpm. The peak tq for the 3076 was achieved at ~4600 rpm. That is 1100 rpm later than stock. That would have an impact on daily driving.

What would the peak tq rpm be with the 3071?
Back in the day when the Vishnu staged kits were the rage, you could opt for spec'd GT3071R and GT3076R. But they were external gated.

I had a 3071, and most everyone else had a 3076. The power on pump gas was identical, about ~350whp uncorrected Dyno Dynamics, good for high 11s and about 117mph trap speeds in a CT9A car. But the 3071 spooled about 300rpm faster. I think the 3071 is superior for autocross and pump gas.

The 3076 made about 10-15whp more on race gas, but it sustained the power MUCH better in the high RPM. Once it hit peak power, it carried it clear over to the rev limiter.

A 3076 on race gas in a CT9A making around 420whp on a Dyno Dynamics is a low eleven second car that will trap 125mph. These are awesome for bigger tracks and roadcourses.

Sorry for using some drag racing analogies too, but it gives you an idea of power.

Sadly, these Evo Xs are 300 pounds heavier, and have nowhere near tall enough 4th to see 120mph trap speeds.

Last edited by Noize; May 27, 2009 at 04:25 PM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #374  
littlebluegt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Just remember that the 300 rpm difference in boost threshold (more correct then "spool") is on a dyno in 3rd or 4th gear.

On the street in 2nd gear both turbos will boost later in the rpm range, and the difference in boost threshold will be greater (like 600 rpm in 2nd gear, maybe 1000 rpm in 1st).

This is after much experience with road dynos done in different gears.

Not saying the 3076 doesn't perform great, or "spool" really well, it definitely appears to, just trying to inject some slightly better info.
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #375  
Philthy748's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by littlebluegt
Just remember that the 300 rpm difference in boost threshold (more correct then "spool") is on a dyno in 3rd or 4th gear.

On the street in 2nd gear both turbos will boost later in the rpm range, and the difference in boost threshold will be greater (like 600 rpm in 2nd gear, maybe 1000 rpm in 1st).

This is after much experience with road dynos done in different gears.

Not saying the 3076 doesn't perform great, or "spool" really well, it definitely appears to, just trying to inject some slightly better info.
That all depends on the load on the car, if you want to split hairs... driving up hill, down hill, passengers in the car, etc...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07 PM.