Evo X bolt on Garrett GT30R turbos
The boost pill is a smaller size than stock. The turbo has to work harder to generate more boost to overcome the resistance of the smaller hole in the pill. A larger hole in the pill will bring down the boost.
What would the peak tq rpm be with the 3071?
That's not too bad, but I also agree with you, I'd like to see how the 3071R spools and how much power it's capable of.
Last edited by ScottSpeed21; May 27, 2009 at 01:50 PM.

The 3076 matches the stock torque at ~3500 rpms. So anywhere above 3500, you're making more power. Not too bad.
This is just the first chart try not to over-analyze it. It is just one example of this turbo on one car. Who knows what power/spool characteristics tuners are going to be able to get once they have mroe experience tuning it.
Then why does cobb require you to take out the boost pill in order to run stage 2 boost levels?
actually the Pill is a restrictor so that the WG sees less boost pressure therefore increasing the boost!
As I said to start with this was a bone stock actuator . Had we fitted the 1.4 bar uprated units we have , 500/525hp would of been a very easy target , this car has had 6 visits to the dyno with many stages of tune with lots of new development parts ,the garrett is a stunning modification to upgrade too !. Turbo speeds show us the turbo is just cruzing in real terms ,the fact 1.6 bar yeilds 480hp is just a small incited to the 4B's power making potential .
This isn't a normal 30r. it is a twin scroll built specifically for the Evo X. If the turbo can't hold boost up top then garrett didn't do their job. Garrett spent a lot of money to produce this turbo seeing that it is car specific and i doubt they let a fact of holding boost up top slip past their R&D team...
Originally Posted by evo400
Boost control on theses new turbos is a little strange as far as the pre load required to hold boost is higher than seen on the stock evo x turbo system .The wastegate valves is a larger diameter and is requiring more preload .
The graph show a stock car on V-power 99 octane UK fuel and also the first tune on the new Garrett GT3076R . On the stock actuator with as much preload as possible it peaked at 1.8 bar droppping to just 1.55bar at peak power . This motor and turbo are very very efficent and are working very well from turbo speeds we logged with the Motec.
The graph show a stock car on V-power 99 octane UK fuel and also the first tune on the new Garrett GT3076R . On the stock actuator with as much preload as possible it peaked at 1.8 bar droppping to just 1.55bar at peak power . This motor and turbo are very very efficent and are working very well from turbo speeds we logged with the Motec.




Garrett did there job perfectly, if you want 30 psi at 8500 you wanta 35r, not a 30R. Making a 30R evox friendly was about making it fit, given the constrictions of space, inlet, and outlet, and they did it very well.
Scorke
I had a 3071, and most everyone else had a 3076. The power on pump gas was identical, about ~350whp uncorrected Dyno Dynamics, good for high 11s and about 117mph trap speeds in a CT9A car. But the 3071 spooled about 300rpm faster. I think the 3071 is superior for autocross and pump gas.
The 3076 made about 10-15whp more on race gas, but it sustained the power MUCH better in the high RPM. Once it hit peak power, it carried it clear over to the rev limiter.
A 3076 on race gas in a CT9A making around 420whp on a Dyno Dynamics is a low eleven second car that will trap 125mph. These are awesome for bigger tracks and roadcourses.
Sorry for using some drag racing analogies too, but it gives you an idea of power.
Sadly, these Evo Xs are 300 pounds heavier, and have nowhere near tall enough 4th to see 120mph trap speeds.
Last edited by Noize; May 27, 2009 at 04:25 PM.
Just remember that the 300 rpm difference in boost threshold (more correct then "spool") is on a dyno in 3rd or 4th gear.
On the street in 2nd gear both turbos will boost later in the rpm range, and the difference in boost threshold will be greater (like 600 rpm in 2nd gear, maybe 1000 rpm in 1st).
This is after much experience with road dynos done in different gears.
Not saying the 3076 doesn't perform great, or "spool" really well, it definitely appears to, just trying to inject some slightly better info.
On the street in 2nd gear both turbos will boost later in the rpm range, and the difference in boost threshold will be greater (like 600 rpm in 2nd gear, maybe 1000 rpm in 1st).
This is after much experience with road dynos done in different gears.
Not saying the 3076 doesn't perform great, or "spool" really well, it definitely appears to, just trying to inject some slightly better info.
Just remember that the 300 rpm difference in boost threshold (more correct then "spool") is on a dyno in 3rd or 4th gear.
On the street in 2nd gear both turbos will boost later in the rpm range, and the difference in boost threshold will be greater (like 600 rpm in 2nd gear, maybe 1000 rpm in 1st).
This is after much experience with road dynos done in different gears.
Not saying the 3076 doesn't perform great, or "spool" really well, it definitely appears to, just trying to inject some slightly better info.
On the street in 2nd gear both turbos will boost later in the rpm range, and the difference in boost threshold will be greater (like 600 rpm in 2nd gear, maybe 1000 rpm in 1st).
This is after much experience with road dynos done in different gears.
Not saying the 3076 doesn't perform great, or "spool" really well, it definitely appears to, just trying to inject some slightly better info.










