Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur Racing EVOX on the DYNOJET 440+whp.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #1  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Buschur Racing EVOX on the DYNOJET 440+whp.

Well I wanted to see how our EVO X would do on a Dynojet so you as customers could compare our numbers to most others that have been put up on Dynojets.

I gave Tym Switzer at Switzer Perforance a call and asked if he could get me in today for a few quick runs. Want to say thanks to Tym and the fellas over there for getting me in and allowing us the time to see what we could make.

First some details. The dyno runs that we made here produced 407 whp and 341 ft lbs, that was on our Mustang Dyno AWD500SE dyno. The dyno run was done in 3rd gear, I do not use any correction factors on our dyno, ever. So the runs on our dyno would be "uncorrected". I also did the runs from 2500 rpm to 7500 rpm here on our dyno. Boost was set at a peak of 24.7 psi.

Now to the Dynojet. Same things were done. 2500-7500 rpm, 3rd gear and we ran the car uncorrected.

The first few pulls the power was not as high as I had expected. Tym suggested the boost may be off between the two dynos because our Mustang Dyno loads the car differently. Sure enough a quick check of the boost and we were only making barely 22 psi. A quick boost adjustment on the BR inline controller and the boost hit right at 25 psi. The power jumped right up to what I had hoped for.

443.23 horsepower and 383.75 ft lbs of torque. Very impressive. This is on STRAIGHT 93 octane at factory peak boost levels.

Here is the dyno sheet:

Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #2  
evox350ztt's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Tracy, Ca
Wow... that's very impressive. I hope I didn't make the wrong decision with the FP-Red. If I can manage close to 400hp on a MD with 91 octane. I would be more than happy. As always great job David. Now for some track time.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #3  
arbo651's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 502
Likes: 1
From: PA
Would you stop posting these 400+ hp posts haha. As if Im not anxious enough already to get this turbo on!!

I love knowing that I can get these numbers with 93 octane and without meth and more boost.

Nick called today and said that my turbo was in. Cant wait to get this car in the 400hp range!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I hope to stop posting these graphs soon! I want to start posting some 500 whp EVO X's. haha
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #5  
apagan01's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (299)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 5
From: digging for oil
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I hope to stop posting these graphs soon! I want to start posting some 500 whp EVO X's. haha
I say its very close the 5XX,,, David very impressive ,,, your doing your thing like usual


Who's tunning the X
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #6  
arbo651's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 502
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I hope to stop posting these graphs soon! I want to start posting some 500 whp EVO X's. haha
Haha. what is your goal for pump gas power on this turbo??
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:21 PM
  #7  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I've suprpassed my goal on pump gas with the car with this turbo. I didn't think it would make nearly this much power.

I've got more work to do on the tuning etc. I'd also like to run the turbo up closer to 30 psi and see how it does on pump gas.

We have been waiting to start on our GT35r kit for the car. I wanted to get a good bolt on combination first and make good power, I've done that. Just need to finalize it all and then we will probably start the 35r header kit.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #8  
Guerillah's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I've suprpassed my goal on pump gas with the car with this turbo. I didn't think it would make nearly this much power.

I've got more work to do on the tuning etc. I'd also like to run the turbo up closer to 30 psi and see how it does on pump gas.

We have been waiting to start on our GT35r kit for the car. I wanted to get a good bolt on combination first and make good power, I've done that. Just need to finalize it all and then we will probably start the 35r header kit.

Sweet
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #9  
Evolution IVGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 1
From: Utah, SLC
WOW Crazy #'s and with the same Factory Boost Wow this is a good Motor Well done Buschur
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
steelcityevo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh pa
David , what does this turbo flow in lb./min. ???

It seems almost that the X motor seems to be slightly more of an efficient design over the 4G63. What do you think??

The port angle is a bit steeper in this motor correct basically aiming down on top of the valves. Instead of making a more drastic change of direction in the ports inside the head. Is that correct???
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 06:15 PM
  #11  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Yes port angle is different. There really isn't much the same or even that similar on the EVO X head compared to the EVO 8-9. The turbo flows 52#'s.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #12  
smabe123's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: nc
we wanna see VIDEOS! Dyno AND street!!!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 06:22 PM
  #13  
steelcityevo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh pa
David you need an AEM at your fingertips you probably got quite a few horses to get even at its current boost level.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 06:55 PM
  #14  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
steelcity, actually, I am in no hurry for the AEM this time around. I am going to attempt to stick with the factory computer 100% on this car. After seeing what Mellon was able to do with the factory ECU in the EVO8 I've been impressed. The EVO X's ECU is making some damn good power right now, I want to see how much more it can make
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #15  
smgevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 303
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Nice numbers David. Keep up the good work Did you expect the differences in dyno number to be what was obtained?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:42 AM.