View Poll Results: On TBE, cat or test pipe?
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll
Cat or no Cat
Later, Ken
I doubt you would ever be prosecuted for modified exhaust in most states if the DBs are low enough and passed emissions.
If you are going to reduce restriction, a high flow cat is better then no cat.
Edit; couple things I found online;
28-955. Mufflers; noise and air pollution prevention; emissions control devices; civil penalty; exception
A. A motor vehicle shall be equipped at all times with a muffler that is in good working order and that is in constant operation to prevent excessive or unusual noise.
B. A person shall not use a muffler cutout, bypass or similar device on a motor vehicle on a highway.
C. The engine and power mechanism of a motor vehicle shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent the escape of excessive fumes or smoke.
D. Beginning with motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines of the 1968 model year, motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines shall be equipped with emissions control devices that meet the standards established by the director of environmental quality.
E. A person who violates this section is subject to a civil penalty of at least one hundred dollars.
F. This section does not apply to an electrically powered motor vehicle.
-------
California Vehicle Code
§ 27151. (a) No person shall modify the exhaust system of a motor vehicle in a manner which will amplify or increase the noise emitted by the motor of the vehicle so that the vehicle is not in compliance with the provisions of Section 27150 or exceeds the noise limits established for the type of vehicle in Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 27200). No person shall operate a motor vehicle with an exhaust system so modified.
(b) For the purposes of exhaust systems installed on motor vehicles with a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of less than 6,000 pounds, other than motorcycles, a sound level of 95 dbA or less, when tested in accordance with Society of Automotive Engineers Standard J1169 May 1998, complies with this section. Motor vehicle exhaust systems or parts thereof include, but are not limited to, nonoriginal exhaust equipment.
Last edited by EvoG8r; Jan 25, 2009 at 06:47 AM.
Well, if you read the law as it is written in Illinois, (I don't know about other state's, but I'm assuming its the same) no modifications to the stock exhaust at all other than replacing it with another stock piece are legal.
It depends on your state/county laws and whether or not a high-flow cat could still pass emissions. Maybe if someone can post the laws pertaining to it.
I doubt you would ever be prosecuted for modified exhaust in most states if the DBs are low enough and passed emissions.
If you are going to reduce restriction, a high flow cat is better then no cat.
Edit; couple things I found online;
28-955. Mufflers; noise and air pollution prevention; emissions control devices; civil penalty; exception
A. A motor vehicle shall be equipped at all times with a muffler that is in good working order and that is in constant operation to prevent excessive or unusual noise.
B. A person shall not use a muffler cutout, bypass or similar device on a motor vehicle on a highway.
C. The engine and power mechanism of a motor vehicle shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent the escape of excessive fumes or smoke.
D. Beginning with motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines of the 1968 model year, motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines shall be equipped with emissions control devices that meet the standards established by the director of environmental quality.
E. A person who violates this section is subject to a civil penalty of at least one hundred dollars.
F. This section does not apply to an electrically powered motor vehicle.
-------
California Vehicle Code
§ 27151. (a) No person shall modify the exhaust system of a motor vehicle in a manner which will amplify or increase the noise emitted by the motor of the vehicle so that the vehicle is not in compliance with the provisions of Section 27150 or exceeds the noise limits established for the type of vehicle in Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 27200). No person shall operate a motor vehicle with an exhaust system so modified.
(b) For the purposes of exhaust systems installed on motor vehicles with a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of less than 6,000 pounds, other than motorcycles, a sound level of 95 dbA or less, when tested in accordance with Society of Automotive Engineers Standard J1169 May 1998, complies with this section. Motor vehicle exhaust systems or parts thereof include, but are not limited to, nonoriginal exhaust equipment.
I doubt you would ever be prosecuted for modified exhaust in most states if the DBs are low enough and passed emissions.
If you are going to reduce restriction, a high flow cat is better then no cat.
Edit; couple things I found online;
28-955. Mufflers; noise and air pollution prevention; emissions control devices; civil penalty; exception
A. A motor vehicle shall be equipped at all times with a muffler that is in good working order and that is in constant operation to prevent excessive or unusual noise.
B. A person shall not use a muffler cutout, bypass or similar device on a motor vehicle on a highway.
C. The engine and power mechanism of a motor vehicle shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent the escape of excessive fumes or smoke.
D. Beginning with motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines of the 1968 model year, motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines shall be equipped with emissions control devices that meet the standards established by the director of environmental quality.
E. A person who violates this section is subject to a civil penalty of at least one hundred dollars.
F. This section does not apply to an electrically powered motor vehicle.
-------
California Vehicle Code
§ 27151. (a) No person shall modify the exhaust system of a motor vehicle in a manner which will amplify or increase the noise emitted by the motor of the vehicle so that the vehicle is not in compliance with the provisions of Section 27150 or exceeds the noise limits established for the type of vehicle in Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 27200). No person shall operate a motor vehicle with an exhaust system so modified.
(b) For the purposes of exhaust systems installed on motor vehicles with a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of less than 6,000 pounds, other than motorcycles, a sound level of 95 dbA or less, when tested in accordance with Society of Automotive Engineers Standard J1169 May 1998, complies with this section. Motor vehicle exhaust systems or parts thereof include, but are not limited to, nonoriginal exhaust equipment.
The sections you cite from California appear to apply ONLY to sound levels; nothing about emmisions.
The difficulty I have found is when I ask a vendor if their "high flowCat" will meet emmision standards, they state, in effect, they do not know. So now the burden is up to you to demonstrate that a non OEM Cat meets State emmisions as well as being a benefit to your performance. For without the latter why bother worrying about the former.
Later, Ken
Later, Ken
The question of Cat or no Cat rests with more than just sound. W/O a Cat you will be pumping out more emmisions and if stopped by an "officer of the law" you will be subject to a fine. To eliminate these possibilities, I would go with a high flow Cat. Just my 2 cents in this current Greener Planet agenda.
Later, Ken
Later, Ken
wow..this thread got law crazy! LOL
Ends up im going with the Cobb TBE when it comes out in a few weeks. THey don't have a test pipe so dont worry about your children dying because of my cat-less exhaust lol
Ends up im going with the Cobb TBE when it comes out in a few weeks. THey don't have a test pipe so dont worry about your children dying because of my cat-less exhaust lol
I hate how cat vs. no-cat always devolve into the environmental/law pissing matches. I don't think the OP needs a moral brow-beating from either side of the fence, as it appears as though he knows what he is getting into.
So to all the greenies and the wannabe state police, take a hike.
So to all the greenies and the wannabe state police, take a hike.
Really angers me that 67% of people (at the time of this post) think it is OK to run catless on what appears to be a daily driver.
Please do the rest of us a favor and keep your catalytic converter in place.
Please do the rest of us a favor and keep your catalytic converter in place.









sorry, you are right. I just read quickly i was giving thumbs up for running a cat period.
