Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

FP Green vs Dom 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 12:02 AM
  #16  
L888Apex's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 72
From: West Coast Yo
nice writeup/review
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 12:33 AM
  #17  
evo ace's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, Ca
Don't know much about the Dom2 Turbo but I heard that the FP Red is more for drag and the FP Green is geared for street.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 07:40 AM
  #18  
slonez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Far East
Originally Posted by gunzo
I have messed with both before

probably one of the very few owners to have done it .. this is done on MR .. so daily driving is subjective because the gearbox likes te bigger turbos

Lag WAS my biggest worry .. surprisingly .. both had very little in terms of daily driving .. I am back to the older 7/8/9 evos with the TD05H !!

Both turbos spool about the same time and both hits full boost around the same rpms .. 3100~3300rpms @27-28psi in 4th gear (3rd was around 35-3800rps) .. and 5th and 6th was around 3000rpms

midrange for both are about the same obviously ..

The green can hold slightly higher boost between 28-30psi and tapering to 25psi at 7500rpms ..

The Dom holds around 28psi and drops to around 26psi at 7000rpms

airflow wise .. Green flows around 410-420g/s at 25psi 7000rpms versus Dom2 26psi 370-380g/s

Just a yardstick for comparison .. stock turbo flows 320-330g/s at 21-22psi 7000rpms

Drivability wise .. the Dom2 is a better street car .. though this is very subjective because the ingear response at part throttle is slightly better..

Overall quite similiar for these 2 turbos ..

I'll be trying out BB-X later .. maybe .. if HB speed is nice
Or another prototype ..
Thks for the real life experience!
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 12:55 PM
  #19  
///M3an Machine's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Thanks Gunzo!

Originally Posted by gunzo
probably one of the very few owners to have done it .. this is done on MR .. so daily driving is subjective because the gearbox likes te bigger turbos
Why does the MR "like" the bigger turbos?


Originally Posted by gunzo
I'll be trying out BB-X later .. maybe .. if HB speed is nice
Or another prototype ..
Would love to hear your comparisons on the BB-X as well, if you could try to remember to update this thread
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 12:57 PM
  #20  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
It likes the bigger turbos because of lag...more lag = less torque on a turbo car (almost always). the sooner we make boost the more potential torque we have.

The MR hates torque...so it likes bigger turbos.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #21  
///M3an Machine's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by murlo26
It likes the bigger turbos because of lag...more lag = less torque on a turbo car (almost always). the sooner we make boost the more potential torque we have.

The MR hates torque...so it likes bigger turbos.
Ahh thanks! Hopefully we will soon know the upper torque threshold of the MR trans with greater accuracy/certainty.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 07:22 PM
  #22  
gunzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by murlo26
It likes the bigger turbos because of lag...more lag = less torque on a turbo car (almost always). the sooner we make boost the more potential torque we have.

The MR hates torque...so it likes bigger turbos.
For some strange reasons .. I only get occasional updates on some threads .. and sometimes I don't get updates at all ..

Ah .. thats not what I meant .. the car made 350-380ftlbs torque midrange .. enough to kill stock manual clutches too

the shifting logic of the SST kept the engine running at the sweet spot when you need it .. like when you're in 6th at low rpms 50mph or so and you need to overtake ? On the SST, just jab the throttle and the engine blips to 4th .. bam 4000+rpms and you're away ..

wonder why FP claims 54lb flow capable .. flow is closer to to 48-49lbs .. and dom is closer to 47lb .. maybe E85 hehe ..
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #23  
brtecson's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Thanks for the info
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 10:30 PM
  #24  
E6-X's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: earth
Originally Posted by gunzo
For some strange reasons .. I only get occasional updates on some threads .. and sometimes I don't get updates at all ..

Ah .. thats not what I meant .. the car made 350-380ftlbs torque midrange .. enough to kill stock manual clutches too

the shifting logic of the SST kept the engine running at the sweet spot when you need it .. like when you're in 6th at low rpms 50mph or so and you need to overtake ? On the SST, just jab the throttle and the engine blips to 4th .. bam 4000+rpms and you're away ..

wonder why FP claims 54lb flow capable .. flow is closer to to 48-49lbs .. and dom is closer to 47lb .. maybe E85 hehe ..
don't we call that a sweet spot ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smokee04
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Oct 27, 2010 03:04 AM
spoolinallthewa
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
May 4, 2010 10:54 AM
EVOEMS
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
61
Sep 24, 2009 01:40 PM
TurboTodd
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
9
Dec 21, 2008 02:00 PM
Kevindanger
Northwest Region
4
Mar 20, 2008 10:44 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.