http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=1

Hope this isn't a repost.

Good small write up. Small hot lap comparison of the two toward the end.

The EVO X SST was more than 1 second faster than the USDM IX.

I still want more detailed reviews. X def looks good.

 

Thanks for posting.

I love you.

edit: I think its a repost lol

 

I believe this was a prehistoric article...

 

Its from a Nov date on the website of R and T, and I couldnt find this on the EVO X forums as a thread this month. Sorry if it is guys but still good article for those who haven't read it

 

this was posted in oct i believe (most magazine articles come out a month before the issue date)

 

Yep, pretty old.

 

Holy old article! Just remember that in this test, its a J-spec Evo X w/SST - the USDM Evo X w/SST WILL be slower.

 

Bumping old *** threads to up your post count so you can sell **** or whatever your angle is, is not only annoying, but ****ing stupid.

Stop being a parasitic asstard.

 

Yeah! We are on to you motherfocker!