Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

The stunning reviews continue...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:22 AM
  #16  
kilgoja's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by madfast
clearly disappointed? almost every review has said that the X is heavier, slower and a tad less communicative
I'm just curious...why does everyone say this car is better if the above statement is true?.....it just doesn't make sense...they must really like cruise control or something
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #17  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Better in a softer, gentler kind of way. To some, the Evos of old are tiring.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #18  
EvilRob's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by kilgoja
I'm just curious...why does everyone say this car is better if the above statement is true?.....it just doesn't make sense...they must really like cruise control or something
Heavier isin't always worse (safety, interior, navigation, strenght), slower in the 1/4 yes not overall (some courses it beats the IX JDM spec and some courses it doesnt), less communicative meaning it will be more forgivable for mistakes you make giving you an edge over other drivers. At least thats what they say it's strenghts are in some of the reviews.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #19  
eddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Before you X fanboys start ganging up on me, understand this: If only you guys could have the chance to own both a IX and a X. Drive one one day and the other the next day. Alternate daily for a good month. I'd love to hear what you guys would say after that experience.

Understand also that Mitsubishi reads these forums. They just might listen to our complaints and build the X that we want. I, for one, want an Evo Sportback RS version. The attached thumbnail is an image of the Concept Sportback.

There's one thing that I absolutely love about the X over the IX. That it's a safer car in a collision. The side impact protection specifically.
Yep, the improved impact protection in the X is great but it's one of the key reasons why the car gained so much weight. Careful what you ask for....
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:32 AM
  #20  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Originally Posted by eddie
Yep, the improved impact protection in the X is great but it's one of the key reasons why the car gained so much weight. Careful what you ask for....
Better side-impact protection is all I want for improved safety. I'm fine with my IX's front and back impact ratings. Think 997 GT3. Strong chassis that protects much better than the Evos of old, but still lightweight.

Last edited by EVO X Owner-2-B; Jan 11, 2008 at 08:38 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:34 AM
  #21  
eddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kilgoja
I'm just curious...why does everyone say this car is better if the above statement is true?.....it just doesn't make sense...they must really like cruise control or something
You gotta read the whole article. A 'tad less communicative' does not turn the car into an Accord. Saying the X is a little slower then the IX doesn't mean it performs like a Camry.
I for one am glad to see the changes (minus the incredible weight gain). Unless I was driving my VIII on track or driving it in anger on the street I really didn't enjoy the experience. Stop and go traffic in this car gets old real quick. Maybe the X will address some of my complaints but I'm not sure yet because like everyone else on these freakin' boards, I haven't driven one yet!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #22  
eddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Better side-impact protection is all I want for improved safety. I'm fine with my IX's front and back impact ratings.
Yes but the government isn't, hence the pedestrian frontal impact zone. And have you ever seen an Evo VIII-IX hit from the rear? They crumple like tinfoil.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #23  
kilgoja's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
yeah i guess the evo will be safer and require less skill to drive and have more creature comforts but is that why anyone wants to buy an evo?....i mean if you want that there are alot better cars out there and they cost much less....like the honda accord or something....i mean ask yourself why did you buy an evo..cuz you wanted more performance, better handling, and a car that was more of a driver's car than your average car out there....right?....if not then there is no reason to buy an evo or any sports car for that matter...i mean that's why you buy a truck...to haul things around and such.....you buy an suv cuz you got lots of people to carry around and safety is a big priority cuz you have kids or whatever....i'm not saying these things aren't important cuz they are....but you don't buy an evo for safety, luxury, or things of this nature....you can find all of that in a better package such as a lexus, acura, or whatever
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #24  
kilgoja's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by eddie
You gotta read the whole article. A 'tad less communicative' does not turn the car into an Accord. Saying the X is a little slower then the IX doesn't mean it performs like a Camry.
i didn't say that it did....
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #25  
rane's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 32
From: VT
Originally Posted by EvilRob
Heavier isin't always worse (safety, interior, navigation, strenght), slower in the 1/4 yes not overall (some courses it beats the IX JDM spec and some courses it doesnt), less communicative meaning it will be more forgivable for mistakes you make giving you an edge over other drivers. At least thats what they say it's strenghts are in some of the reviews.
Heavier is always worse for people that want to shave off fractions of a second.

The X doesn't seem to know what it is, and tries to be everything at once. Is it a sophisticated performance vehicle for DD? Is it a hardcore rally car like its predecessors?

My question? Why should I buy a X? If I remember correctly, the jump from the VIII to the IX brought with it a bigger turbo and MIVEC. The jump to the X is giving us...a navigation system? A prettier interior? (we all know that's crucial when racing) A performance "increase" that's virtually negligible?

Why not just stick with the IX exactly? Or VIII for that matter?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #26  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
^The X is not the racer's car, for sure. More like the car for the fat and lazy.

My over-generalized, over-exaggeration.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #27  
kilgoja's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
^+1
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #28  
Fabulous71's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, California
Originally Posted by mdinubil
Did i miss the stunning portion of the review?
stunning = sarcasm
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #29  
OniKoroshi's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
What's so hard to understand that pure sports cars don't sell anymore, even if they are great cars.

Look at what happened to the Toyota Supra, Mazda RX-7, 3000GT, Firebird, Camaro, the list goes on and on. But I guess people would rather Mitsu kept up with the raw sports car feeling and had the line up be discontinued after the X.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #30  
rane's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 32
From: VT
Originally Posted by OniKoroshi
But I guess people would rather Mitsu kept up with the raw sports car feeling and had the line up be discontinued after the X.
No, no, BEFORE the X
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:16 PM.