AGP EVO X Makes 443hp...

Subscribe
Apr 14, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #16  
nice power on the c-16 is that with the stock injectors
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #17  
you never know if the low trap speeds are due to lack of traction or slipping clutch or poor shifting. I think that is great that the 4b11 is responding so well with mods.
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #18  
WOW...Exactly why I have avoided this forum for so long...Just for you Internet geniuses...Do the math for how much more power it takes to trap 120+ in a car that weighs 200-250lbs more than an 8 or 9, and then factor in a 4-5 shift near the end of the track.
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #19  
I'm interested, can you tell me what the 20g wheel did ito the spool of the turbo? Does it still spool close to stock?
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #20  
Quote: I'm interested, can you tell me what the 20g wheel did ito the spool of the turbo? Does it still spool close to stock?

pretty close actually


Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #21  
Quote: Do the math for how much more power it takes to trap 120+ in a car that weighs 200-250lbs more than an 8 or 9, and then factor in a 4-5 shift near the end of the track.
OT crap removed, and this post is exactly correct. 4th gear in an Evo X is redline at 104mph, the rev limiter is at 111mph. The reason older cars trapped higher is they had a taller final drive ratio, and could attain higher speeds in 4th.
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #22  
Quote: WOW...Exactly why I have avoided this forum for so long...Just for you Internet geniuses...Do the math for how much more power it takes to trap 120+ in a car that weighs 200-250lbs more than an 8 or 9, and then factor in a 4-5 shift near the end of the track.
Or you could just tell us the state in which the car went 12.04 @115. You have the mods and two dyno numbers, are we supposed to guess which it is? This could have just been a dyno pull. How are we supposed to know if the run correlated with the exact numbers you showed? Not trying to be a dick, I just wanted to know the whp that made it go 12.04 @ 115
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #23  
Nice HP numbers and nice track time.
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #24  
Quote: Or you could just tell us the state in which the car went 12.04 @115. You have the mods and two dyno numbers, are we supposed to guess which it is? This could have just been a dyno pull. How are we supposed to know if the run correlated with the exact numbers you showed? Not trying to be a dick, I just wanted to know the whp that made it go 12.04 @ 115
The stats on the car are in the first post sir.

The dyno shown was a comparison from the stock baseline to the current set up, for someone asking about turbo spool differences.
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #25  
Quote: The stats on the car are in the first post sir.

The dyno shown was a comparison from the stock baseline to the current set up, for someone asking about turbo spool differences.
So basically you went 12.0@115 with 443whp?? Hmmm...
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #26  
Quote: The stats on the car are in the first post sir.

The dyno shown was a comparison from the stock baseline to the current set up, for someone asking about turbo spool differences.
I understand the graph, I was just referring to the 443whp and 370whp claim. There was no claim as to which state of tune the car ran the specified time, that's all. Can I ask where the shift points were? Any lag between shifts?Thanks
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #27  
Quote: So basically you went 12.0@115 with 443whp?? Hmmm...
yeah that's kind of off isn't it??
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #28  
ok...I guess I'll leave for a few months for the rest of the evom planet to figure out how much 200+lbs and a shift to 5th means in a 1/4 mile. I love how a lot of you immediately insinuate that the numbers are doctored...Turbo tricks *ONLY* ran a 12.5 with somewhere around 370...Ignore the numbers if you like...but you wont find a faster X...for now anyways.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/N...own_156067.htm

this was posted april 1st.

Tony
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #29  
Congrats on the run!
Reply 0
Apr 14, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #30  
Tony, Ben and rest of AGP team. This is the stuff I'm talking about. Don't mind the people that have no idea what they are talking about. That is why god created a delete button for the mods. Physics isn't required for forum reading / or drag racing. they wouldn't understand why you had to shift into 5th if you pulled out a chalkboard, drew them a picture and fed them doggy treats to understand it.

ps tell ben i want my car to run like that :P i "might" even let him put a sticker on it
Reply 0