Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Narrowed down list for intake and turbo-back, but still can't decide.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #16  
westmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by lakay888
I just went with drop in filter with agp hard pipe intake I made same power as my friend with his aem, and its a sleeper specially when the highway patrol ask you to open your hood, for turbo back I went with T1R 76s cat back exhaust a little pricy but I got mine black friday so I got it for a very good deal, its louder than stock, but not too loud that you get attention, quality is not bad,really nice throaty sound at WOT, no drooning sound inside chek out you tube, ams widemouth and RRE rallye test pipe with CEL fix from pep boys(this is a resonated test pipe with a cat heatshield welded to it so it looks like a stock cat if you look at it) I have a mr also and yes you want to pick the right exhaust bcause of the SST if you pick a loud one it will get a lot of attention, far as the intake goes the stock set up is pretty effiecient already all you need is a high flow AF and replace the rubber intake with a hard pipe if you like to keep it low key
so good luck
I'm not that familiar with T1R. Like Ultimate Racing, I'm kind of hesitant about brands that seem really small.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 06:53 PM
  #17  
westmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by atombomb33
Now, THIS is how members should post a "help me decide" thread. You've told us what you want, what's important and laid out the pros/cons (in your opinion) of the products you are considering. If only other members could follow your path

Onto your questions.

For the intake, they'll all perform nearly the same...to be honest. Especially since you're pairing them with the Cobb AP. They are all good products, so you really can't go wrong. Price should be a consideration in this case. Also making sure there is an AP map for the intake is important. Finally, the UICP in the Injen kit is nice to have since the UICP is the "hot" pipe on the Evo X and it will make a nice impact in throttle response and possibly a small bump in hp/tq. That would be my choice. Or, buy one of the other intakes and get an UICP on the side (many members like the Nisei one piece). The UICP is a good mod to get.

BUT, unless you have much bigger plans for mods in the future, you don't need an intake. A drop-in filter will give you the same performance bump for the simple mods you have listed. If you want the turbo "sound" then you'll need the intake, but just know that it won't help on the performance side unless you plan to do more with the car.

For exhaust, again it's a toss-up and all of them are good products. The ETS exhaust is loud, so that might not work for you. I would choose between the Perrin and AMS exhausts, and would probably go with the Perrin TBE because it's less expensive than the full AMS exhaust. Both of them sound good. The advantage of the AMS downpipe is really only noticeable if you plan to upgrade your turbo. On the stock turbo, you'll see little to no gains.
Thank you for the detailed response. I hadn't given much thought to the UICP and thought that Injen was including it more for bling than anything else.

I do want to hear the turbo and bov more which is one of the main reasons why I am considering the intake over a drop-in.

For the exhaust, you mentioned the ETS, AMS, and Perrin but do you have an opinion on the Cobb?
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 09:57 PM
  #18  
westmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Excalibur
ets intake
ams or cobb exhaust
I've noticed in a number of threads (including this one) where people tend to choose the ETS intake over the AMS and the AMS exhaust over the ETS. I'm just curious why. Does the MAF stay the same with the AMS like it does with the ETS?
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:12 PM
  #19  
tjac357's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by westmc
I've noticed in a number of threads (including this one) where people tend to choose the ETS intake over the AMS and the AMS exhaust over the ETS. I'm just curious why. Does the MAF stay the same with the AMS like it does with the ETS?
what do you mean by "stay the same"? I just installed mine and it's in the same locationish and is the same unit.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #20  
tjac357's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by westmc
I've noticed in a number of threads (including this one) where people tend to choose the ETS intake over the AMS and the AMS exhaust over the ETS. I'm just curious why. Does the MAF stay the same with the AMS like it does with the ETS?
what do you mean by "stay the same"? I just installed mine and it's in the same locationish and is the same unit.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:31 PM
  #21  
westmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by tjac357
what do you mean by "stay the same"? I just installed mine and it's in the same locationish and is the same unit.
Sorry, I meant MAF readings stay the same.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #22  
Frankiago's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 856
Likes: 1
From: IL
ETS uses the stock MAF sensor HOUSING, AMS replaces that housing with the piping and includes a flange for mounting the sensor. The new piping is bigger diameter, ETS has it bottle down to stock ID whereas AMS keeps the same diameter throughout. Take that info as you will, but the AMS will require a tune because of this change in ID of the MAF sensor housing.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:58 PM
  #23  
goevox's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: usa
uh its just pipes bro, buy one, install it, enjoy...
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 06:25 AM
  #24  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Ets has a bigger filter and a flowstack inside.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 08:10 AM
  #25  
westmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Excalibur
Ets has a bigger filter and a flowstack inside.
I hear so many good things about the ETS intake, it just amazes me that they don't have AccessPort support. I am trying to decide if that is a deal-breaker or not.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 08:53 AM
  #26  
RedSER13's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
why is it a con for you to have a quiet intake like the AEM?
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 09:02 AM
  #27  
atombomb33's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 2
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Originally Posted by westmc
I'm not that familiar with T1R. Like Ultimate Racing, I'm kind of hesitant about brands that seem really small.
T1R and UR make a good exhaust. The T1R is regarded as one of the quietest (if not the quietest) exhausts available for the Evo X. It's barely louder than stock...so I'm not sure that would fit your goal of being louder than stock. I don't know much about the UR exhaust other than I know they make good stuff.

Originally Posted by westmc
Thank you for the detailed response. I hadn't given much thought to the UICP and thought that Injen was including it more for bling than anything else.

I do want to hear the turbo and bov more which is one of the main reasons why I am considering the intake over a drop-in.

For the exhaust, you mentioned the ETS, AMS, and Perrin but do you have an opinion on the Cobb?
I'm not familiar with the Cobb exhaust which is why I didn't comment on it.





In the end, all of these products you've mentioned are solid products and are supported by great EvoM vendors. You would be happy with just about any combination of these parts and will see essentially the same gains (within 1% of each other) and it really all depends on the tune...and you're using an AP which will even things out since the AP provides a safe tune
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #28  
sohcpunk's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: SoCAL
My 2 cents. I have the Injen, intake and UICP combo. The build quality is top notch and is expected from Injen since they are known for their intakes. Price might be high listed but I'm pretty sure you can get it pretty low by PMing some vendors here on the board. I've made considerable power with this intake. The good thing about it also is that it doesn't fudge up your MAF like the AEM ones do. I think for an intake and UCIP it is a steal. I know Nanji, a well respected tuner in Socal highly recommends this intake for all the tunes he does. He says it makes the most power and is easiest to tune. PERIOD. If you're looking into getting a custom tune with the AP in the future, I'd go with the Injen.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 01:07 PM
  #29  
westmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by RedSER13
why is it a con for you to have a quiet intake like the AEM?
I'd like to hear the turbo and bov a little more. I've heard differing things about whether the AEM is actually any louder than stock.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #30  
pyrofire127's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: dallas tx
Well looks like your on the right track with all the research you've done

I went with Turbo XS TBE because of the price, and AEM intake because it fit with the Cobb flash and i liked the idea of blocking out as much heat as possible.
Im very happy with both

Good luck! post up with what you choose!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 AM.