Does anyone have video to prove that Mitsubishi have a good AWD system?
Yeah, good point. That's one place where Mitsu beat Porsche. Porsche actually invented their own balance-shaft system for the 944 but it didn't work as well as Mitsu's. Rather than run their own, sub-optimal, system, Porsche paid Mitsu to use the better one.
But, as in the case of the AWD system, no collaboration occurred. Porsche went head-to-head with Mitsu and lost. They had the grace to admit it, too.
But, as in the case of the AWD system, no collaboration occurred. Porsche went head-to-head with Mitsu and lost. They had the grace to admit it, too.
How about the Evo outrunning the STI about 3 full seconds at C&D's '11 Lightning Lap despite being heavier and with having less hp?
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...2-class-page-3
Or how about C&D declaring it the best handling car under $40,000?
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...tion-mr-page-7
Or perhaps, it's the .99gs of lat. acceleration and the 70.7mph on the slalom pulled by the GSR, according to InsideLine:
http://www.insideline.com/mitsubishi...u-wrx-sti.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...2-class-page-3
Or how about C&D declaring it the best handling car under $40,000?
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...tion-mr-page-7
Or perhaps, it's the .99gs of lat. acceleration and the 70.7mph on the slalom pulled by the GSR, according to InsideLine:
http://www.insideline.com/mitsubishi...u-wrx-sti.html
How about the Evo outrunning the STI about 3 full seconds at C&D's '11 Lightning Lap despite being heavier and with having less hp?
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...2-class-page-3
Or how about C&D declaring it the best handling car under $40,000?
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...tion-mr-page-7
Or perhaps, it's the .99gs of lat. acceleration and the 70.7mph on the slalom pulled by the GSR, according to InsideLine:
http://www.insideline.com/mitsubishi...u-wrx-sti.html

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...2-class-page-3
Or how about C&D declaring it the best handling car under $40,000?
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...tion-mr-page-7
Or perhaps, it's the .99gs of lat. acceleration and the 70.7mph on the slalom pulled by the GSR, according to InsideLine:
http://www.insideline.com/mitsubishi...u-wrx-sti.html

It's probably impossible to assign exact percents to the tires, wheels, suspension, weight-distribution, drivetrain, etc, but when it comes to things like lateral g on a skid-pad, the AYC must be playing a non-zero role in our advantages over many other cars. At least, an Evo X with a blown rear pump can't turn anywhere near as well as an Evo X with a working rear pump.
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fromWRXtoEVO
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
34
Apr 4, 2017 12:14 PM
lathiat
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Nov 24, 2015 09:17 AM
Joshs EVO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
41
Jun 12, 2013 11:05 AM
mitlan
09+ Lancer Ralliart General
8
Jan 16, 2012 05:51 PM
tdanmorello
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
8
Jun 14, 2010 08:02 PM










