Notices
Evo X Show / Shine Post your pictures, photoshops, and videos!

Evo X vs GT-R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 09:48 PM
  #121  
Milf_Hunter_V's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach
Lmao!! Not even gonna go through this whole thread, that 5grand part is dumb as crap!!! Hahahaha
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 05:23 AM
  #122  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Gt-r is a better car then the X. Simple is that. If you want to compere hooked up X compere it to the equally hooked GT-R too.
The value of the car is never the car fault, besides not a same for every one pocket either...
I like both cars for different reasons.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 06:09 AM
  #123  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Aww man, the pics from post # 1 are gone

Either way, the X and GTR are both amazing cars! I definitely wouldn't mind putting a GTR in my garage eventually.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 07:51 AM
  #124  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
As much as I agree that the GT-R is better, especially in a slightly modified realm, people have to look at AMS' fleet.

Their GT-R and their evo x both modified heavily ran within .1 or something really close last time around a track both driven by the same guy and the X won.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:21 AM
  #125  
rashid.4v's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by murlo26
As much as I agree that the GT-R is better, especially in a slightly modified realm, people have to look at AMS' fleet.

Their GT-R and their evo x both modified heavily ran within .1 or something really close last time around a track both driven by the same guy and the X won.
I'd like to see this same comparison ie, same driver same invested dollar for dollar cars run the 'ring, which is an example of an all out full featured course w/ multiple long straights and tight apexes.
I'm no expert by any means but I predict a very different outcome favoring the GTR.

The Evo is "like", "similar"... , these are association words. By no means is the beloved Evo a contender in a head to head comparison for the GTR.

Sticker price be damned. We don't by evos instead of a GTR because we can spend $90k but don't want to in favor of spending $30-40k plus amount "x" in mods to save money.
I call that Britney Spears!
The fact is the GTR is out of most of our price range or specific needs(eg. 4 drs), so we attempt to bring an evo up to the GTR's stock performance level and then say "it was cheaper and it's like a GTR". In itself that statement verifies GTR >Evo.

Be honest people.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:23 AM
  #126  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Feel free to call out AMS, I don't give a ****, lol. They are essentially the most most respected Evo and GTR shop in the country I'd say...they don't care which one goes faster.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:27 AM
  #127  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by rashid.4v
Be honest people.
You hit the nail on the head.

stock vs. stock


...and the gap just widens the more you mod the GTR.

Last edited by Kracka; Jan 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #128  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Here you go:

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...d=102800902880

It was at buttonwillow. Both the cars are not full out race cars by any means. Looks like they both just had really expensive coilover systems. The X had a 2.3L motor with 900x package and the GT-R ran 9's on pump gas...so yea.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:39 AM
  #129  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Edmunds article/video:

AMS X vs. stock GT-R
http://www.insideline.com/mitsubishi...mprobable.html
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:41 AM
  #130  
WARRIORVR38DETT's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: USA
They are both incredible cars in their own right. I am blessed enough to have both. Obviously, the GT-R is in a league of it's own. But for the price, the Evo is incredible and I am very happy with it. For the doubters...you need to drive a GT-R first to see just how competent of a performer it really is. The car defies physics.

I didn't read the thread since it's probably a waste lol. All I can tell you is that they are both the best of the best in their own price range.
Attached Thumbnails Evo X vs GT-R-evogtr.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #131  
Jonjo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: UK
i've owned both, and all i really need to say is i pick up my new X this weekend

joe
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 12:40 PM
  #132  
slo4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
From: hmmmm
AMS and their decisions on using the EVO..... we can't ignore the fact that they are a business and making parts for the EVO is good business for them.

Same with the GTR, far less amount of cars sold, however, if you can afford one, you can afford aftermarket parts as well. I don't think companies like AMS will have people knickel and diming them to death like from the EVO fellas/ladies.

In the world of performance, it's funny how there are "standards" or "reasons" when someone/something is "less". We find many people in our community using the whole "add x amount of money into the evo and it will perform as good as a GTR for far less. That in itself is one of the dumbest statements I have seen.

It's used on many forums, always when trying to compare to an all out "BETTER CAR".
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 05:12 PM
  #133  
justin81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Lake Dallas Texas
Originally Posted by WARRIORVR38DETT
All I can tell you is that they are both the best of the best in their own price range.
That's the way I always looked at it. I haven't had the pleasure of riding in a GTR yet, but it seems to me that in their price ranges you can't go wrong with the two. I hope to pay off the 2 Evos and pick up a used GTR in a few years.

Maybe I can find someone in the DFW that will give me a ride in one.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 05:21 PM
  #134  
DepoRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: North
you can get a used gt-r at a good price, throw in a tune and you are near 500whp,
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 06:40 PM
  #135  
JDMCE9A's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: orlando fl
dealing with 2 different animals here,the evo cant keep up on the top end like teh gtr. if the gtr tries the fast turns in teh woods like the evo,the gtr driver will be picking splinters out of his ***
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:40 PM.