Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

sat. radio...? I-POD? which is better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #16  
kf6ytc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Turlock, Ca
my xm is good for me
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 05:33 PM
  #17  
Willie Dynamite's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: West Chester, PA
Originally Posted by evolved8
there also getting howard stern, completly uncensored starting in january... xm has opie and anthony.... not even close.
You're right it's not even close. O & A a so much better. It really comes down to personal preference when it comes to the channels. Look over a channel line up and see what is more appealing. Talk to others in your area to see how the signals are too. Sirius can be spotty.

Also to the guy that said MLB is pointless on radio, MLB has a long standing tradition of radio broadcasts and you get the home team announcers.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
evo4g63awd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Elgin
I actually work with sat radio for my job -car electronics, installation is fairly simple, just be carefull with your antenna. i would choose getting a direct tuner box for your aftermarket radio (if available) and between sat radios, i would choose sirius. i actually have xm and sirius, and i like a lot of the stations of what sirius has to offer more than i do xm, although xm does have a few good ones sirius doesnt. as far as the ipod goes, its your call, your going to pay either way. pay 13 a month for a lot of different music, or have an ipod where you put what you have in there. i say go with sat radio, gives you a better variety
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 11:06 PM
  #19  
evolved8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
wow... im amazed that someone said opie and anthony are better... last i checked it was howard stern who was killing in ratings, damn near made the genre what it is today, and much less is one amazing influential person.

wow, like i said, mlb may have a long standing tradition on radio, but its not exactly exciting to listen to... and dont brag about being able to listen to the home teams... siriuis gives u the option to listen to the home team announcers or the away team announcers... (unless ur a titan fan, like me... when i cant watch the games on my sunday ticket due to work, i can only listen to the away team broadcast announcers because the titans flagship radio station is a bunch of dicks and wont allow siriuis to broadcast the play.... )
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #20  
Willie Dynamite's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: West Chester, PA
Originally Posted by evolved8
wow... im amazed that someone said opie and anthony are better... last i checked it was howard stern who was killing in ratings, damn near made the genre what it is today, and much less is one amazing influential person.

wow, like i said, mlb may have a long standing tradition on radio, but its not exactly exciting to listen to... and dont brag about being able to listen to the home teams... siriuis gives u the option to listen to the home team announcers or the away team announcers... (unless ur a titan fan, like me... when i cant watch the games on my sunday ticket due to work, i can only listen to the away team broadcast announcers because the titans flagship radio station is a bunch of dicks and wont allow siriuis to broadcast the play.... )
Home team as in your home team. Doesn't matter if they are at home or away. Stern was great in the early 90's.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 08:39 AM
  #21  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
its a touch debate between xm and sirrus. When I was in Daytona for a trip that circuit city sent me on (RPM) everyone from the west coast said the sirrus was better. Everyone from the east coast said that xm was better...

I guess it depends on what you listen to, and the quality of service in your area..
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #22  
evo4g63awd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Elgin
haha, how can howard be killing opie and anthony, he isnt even on till jan of 06, there are a lot of people buying sirius because of him. but idk
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #23  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
i love sirius! Howard Stern is coming in Jan. and i listen to the Jim Brewer show all the time!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:41 AM
  #24  
evolved8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
last time i checked, howard has been on for like... 20 years? something like that.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #25  
Jamdown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: NY
I have an Ipod hooked up through my head unit and the sound quality is great. I've driven in a car with XM radio (direct line in) and it was nowhere as sharp in audio quality as the ipod. YMMV
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #26  
SterlingEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 0
From: StVa
Originally Posted by heisman
Im gunna get something in my car. I drive long distances and don’t get all the channels I want or get sick of my CDs. which would you guys prefer? How much installation does it take to put in sat. stereo in the EVO?
thanks for the help
Well here's the problem with the iPod: It's just going to be your "same old" music, that is, the iPod will only have the music on it that you put there.

Sat. Radio, on the other hand will have (has) a tremendous variety of music, not to mention sports, comedy, talk, etc... and of course you'll get reception basically wherever you are. In other words if you're only using it for your car, I'd say the iPod is cool, but the money would be far better spent on Sirius or XM, especially if your main reason is variety!

Incidentally, my wife and I are getting each other Sirius for christmas...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:57 AM
  #27  
SterlingEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 0
From: StVa
Originally Posted by evolved8
last time i checked, howard has been on for like... 20 years? something like that.
He meant that Howard is moving from "free" radio to Sirius in January...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #28  
05evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: MA
you could get both....FM modulators would be the best way to hook them up satilite radio involves a magnetic antenna on your roof and a cigarette liter socket or if you want a clean install just have it hardwired...professional install for a sat radio is gonna be like 75 or 85 at like a circuit city. IPOD is just music and Satillite radio is music, comedy weather, sports etc. and only 13 dollars a month you could go with both but if it was one or the other go with sat radio.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #29  
ksattic's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Mountain View, CA
XM have always had a problem with shallow platlists, so on a long car ride, you usually hear the same song fifteen times. Also, the quality sounds more like stereo AM; it is not as good quality as FM. Explanation: I have a Pioneer Premier deck with IP-bus XM unit, so the connectivity is all digital, but the main problem is the horrendously low bitrate (less noticeable on high bitrate channels such as BPM) and poor stereo separation resulting in crappy soundstage.

I am planning on making the switch to Sirius since they cost the same per month and Sirius has many more channels I prefer. You can listen to Sirius online free for three days.

Get a sat-ready head unit with mp3 capability and listen to both Sirius and XM in a store to see which one has the channels you prefer.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 11:21 AM
  #30  
ksattic's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Mountain View, CA
This weekend I finally ditched XM and moved to Sirius - what a difference! I originally had XM installed by Car Toys as I had no time at all at that point to do the installation myself - worst decision I ever made. They installed the tuner above the pedals, dangling from some cable ties, and the power connector was rubbing against some metal, so it shorted out within days and blew a fuse. They also glued the antenna to the roof for some reason, even though it is a magnetic mount.

I removed all the crap, cleaned the glue off my roof and did a clean Sirius install. I put the tuner behind the cubby hole below the head unit and mounted the antenna on the roof at the front centre just behind the windshield, running the wire behind the rubber strips. I'll see if I can take some pics later and maybe document the installation with pictures.

The sound quality on Sirius is better as far as the stereo separation goes. Also, I can pick up my favourite station from the UK (Radio 1), so I am happy.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:57 PM.