IX vs Spec C
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
IX vs Spec C
Evolved Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: California, Orange County, Fullerton
these posts are stupid...
1. just a f'in car
2. of course everyone's going to be biased for their car...(oh but it was only evo IX GSR, why not use MR...STis are ugly...evos can turn better...blah blah)
3. only starts unnecessary flame war
4. who gives a crap?
1. just a f'in car
2. of course everyone's going to be biased for their car...(oh but it was only evo IX GSR, why not use MR...STis are ugly...evos can turn better...blah blah)
3. only starts unnecessary flame war
4. who gives a crap?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Late Apex
correct me if im wrong but isnt the Spec-C the "best" sti? Their best performer?
Why dont they compare it to the FQ400 then? Why just a regular 9?
Why dont they compare it to the FQ400 then? Why just a regular 9?
fq-400 > spec-c > usdm evo9 > us sti
Evolving Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Late Apex
correct me if im wrong but isnt the Spec-C the "best" sti? Their best performer?
Why dont they compare it to the FQ400 then? Why just a regular 9?
Why dont they compare it to the FQ400 then? Why just a regular 9?
It is the equivalent of the EVO RS model.
It has nowhere near the power of the FQ-400.
In fact the Spec-C would be hard pressed to beat 320, let alone 340, 400 etc...
ok kool thanks for clearin that up and none of the sti series could hold a candle to the fq 400 i mean that car keeps up with lambos on the track (see the vid from top gear lol) and whens the lock comin?
