IX vs Spec C
Evolved Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by DCSilvrEvo
WHo Cares if we dont get the cars. They are production models isnt that what matters? I have yet to see an STI outperform an EVO. Spec C,B,A whateva
"See the Sti is the better car!"
And I don't think is relevant. As Chronohunter said is a completely different animal to the US Sti! just like an FQ is different to a US Evo.
My point is it is possible to take either one of the base US models with an unlimited budget turn em into world rally class cars.
But we already have a good idea of the baseline US models we have and their handeling characteristics.
So what's with the; "my daddy is stronger than your daddy jousting?!"
Evolving Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by Turbo-Ron
It's just that some people want to use this as an Evo vs Sti chart to say:
"See the Sti is the better car!"
And I don't think is relevant. As Chronohunter said is a completely different animal to the US Sti! just like an FQ is different to a US Evo.
My point is it is possible to take either one of the base US models with an unlimited budget turn em into world rally class cars.
But we already have a good idea of the baseline US models we have and their handeling characteristics.
So what's with the; "my daddy is stronger than your daddy jousting?!"
"See the Sti is the better car!"
And I don't think is relevant. As Chronohunter said is a completely different animal to the US Sti! just like an FQ is different to a US Evo.
My point is it is possible to take either one of the base US models with an unlimited budget turn em into world rally class cars.
But we already have a good idea of the baseline US models we have and their handeling characteristics.
So what's with the; "my daddy is stronger than your daddy jousting?!"
The diff between the US Sti and the spec C is far greater than the diff between the MR and the FQ300MR. The spec C is more like a sharper FQMR than a US spec Sti.
