New tranny info....
Name a car with a manual transmission that can handle 1000hp & 922 lb/ft of torque. Don't worry, DSG can handle it! It's called a Bugatti Veyron.
While VW uses a weaker version for its lesser cars (nothing wrong with that, BTW), the Veyron is absolute proof that the DSG can be built strong enough for the Evo or anything else.
While VW uses a weaker version for its lesser cars (nothing wrong with that, BTW), the Veyron is absolute proof that the DSG can be built strong enough for the Evo or anything else.
more pics of Evo X driveline
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/lates...Co_200707.html
particularly:
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_3.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_4.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_5.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_7.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_9.jpg
(hopefully not a repost)
particularly:
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_3.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_4.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_5.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_7.jpg
http://digiads.com.au/car-news/new/i...0606-img_9.jpg
(hopefully not a repost)
Im all for the new trans because of the new tech but the stock trans on an VIII or IX can handle a good amount of power but the clutch cannot so I assume that even though its a dual clutch I doubt its as strong as a dual disc clutch is for a normal manual trans. And who knows if the clutch can even be replaced at a reasonable cost on the new trans.
In researching the possibility of buying the upcoming VW R32, I spoke to Nik Brkich at HPA, makers of some seriously powerful turbo kits for the R32. They said that the stock R32 DSG can handle up to 400 whp. They offer clutch replacements for their kits that go higher than that, so I imagine it will just take some time before shops start offering the same thing for the Evo X.
Last edited by Chibana; Jul 19, 2007 at 06:11 PM.
I find those pictures very interesting. This one looks like the front diff:
The core appears to be an open diff, but the clutch plates hopefully mean the S-AWC system will makeit act like a LSD.
This one is of the rear diff:
What interests me is the part closest to the camera. If you look at This Whitepaper on the S-AWC system, you can see in the diagrams that the ols S-AYC system used an open diff design, whereas their original plan for the S-AWC system used an LSD (you can see the clutchpacks on the left.) But in the picture above, there are planetary gears where the LSD and Open Diff internals are on the two diagrams.
I'm not sre why this change was made. I'm trying to figure out the diff from the picture, but I don't see a clear reason. The only thing I can think of is that with the Open Diff or LSD arrangement, there's still going to be at least a small amount of torque going to the left wheel. With a planetary, it means the left wheel can be completely disengaged. But that shifts a lot of the load to the torque-splitting gears. This is a BIG change compared to the whitepaper. I'm sure Mitsu has it all figured out. But being an armchair engineer, this change has me very curious.
If only it were possible to talk about this with their engineers. Oh well.
This one is of the rear diff:
What interests me is the part closest to the camera. If you look at This Whitepaper on the S-AWC system, you can see in the diagrams that the ols S-AYC system used an open diff design, whereas their original plan for the S-AWC system used an LSD (you can see the clutchpacks on the left.) But in the picture above, there are planetary gears where the LSD and Open Diff internals are on the two diagrams.
I'm not sre why this change was made. I'm trying to figure out the diff from the picture, but I don't see a clear reason. The only thing I can think of is that with the Open Diff or LSD arrangement, there's still going to be at least a small amount of torque going to the left wheel. With a planetary, it means the left wheel can be completely disengaged. But that shifts a lot of the load to the torque-splitting gears. This is a BIG change compared to the whitepaper. I'm sure Mitsu has it all figured out. But being an armchair engineer, this change has me very curious.
If only it were possible to talk about this with their engineers. Oh well.
In researching the possibility of buying the upcoming VW R32, I spoke to Nik Brkich at HPA, makers of some seriously powerful turbo kits for the R32. They said that the stock R32 DSG can handle up to 400 whp. They offer clutch replacements for their kits that go higher than that, so I imagine it will just take some time before shops start offering the same thing for the Evo X.
"Twin Clutch SST"
If I never had to row a gear again, if it reliably and quickly blipped gears like Michael Schumacher's F1 car, and it could hold ~500whp, I think this might be the most perfect internal combustion-based performance car value to date for me.
Does anyone know if Mitsu is sourcing these from Borg-Warner or building from scratch?
Best,
Adam
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I was look on the VW GTI forum to check out how much abuse the DSG can handle, if EVO X uses the same GTI DSG, then it could only hold about 320 whp which is a lot for the GTI, but very little for the X. I will be happy if the DSG in the evo x can handle 500 or les WHP.
I don't know if the older S-AYC system could be turned off, but I don't think you'll be able to shut the S-AWC system in the Evo X off.


