Features the UTEC REALLY REALLY Needs to compete with a Standalone
Originally Posted by Imprezd
We have made 460+ whp with stock cams and MAF and my boss drives the car everyday, he loves it.
Jermaine~
www.turboxs.com
301-977-4727
Jermaine~
www.turboxs.com
301-977-4727
I think the stumbling I'm getting is a direct result of the blowthrough setup.. the airflow output readings are just "Different" than the stock MAF and I"ve been trying to calibrate it without much luck.. But I want to get it configured so I know the voltages needed in the blowthrough sensor so the future units can be calibrated by default.
Originally Posted by Imprezd
It's almost a no win situation because if we do decide to do a blow through maf configuration you still have those Evo & WRX who will still want a speed density sytem. To be like everyone else.
The EVO's stock maf is awesome because it's so linear but, with it being so linear is it very sensitive at the same time. So even when you vent air back into the intake the car will stumble slightly because of the flow on the back side of the sensor. But take a look at your afr log i bet is relatively flat and dead on where ever you tune it.
The cars that come here and get tuned we haven't seen the part throttle stumbling issues. Previous version of firmware yes, new stuff nope.
Thanks,
Jermaine~
The EVO's stock maf is awesome because it's so linear but, with it being so linear is it very sensitive at the same time. So even when you vent air back into the intake the car will stumble slightly because of the flow on the back side of the sensor. But take a look at your afr log i bet is relatively flat and dead on where ever you tune it.
The cars that come here and get tuned we haven't seen the part throttle stumbling issues. Previous version of firmware yes, new stuff nope.
Thanks,
Jermaine~
However at the least there should be some sort of EIDS equivalant.. I don't mind speed density, Ijust am too aware of the glitches and shortcomings that I've had with systems like that.. I am almost tempted to say "Why do what everyone else does" its not like its better, its just a different less efficient way to solve an inherant problem.. But I understand that the demand for the feature is greater, and I'll live with speed density when its released..
Last edited by MalibuJack; Dec 10, 2004 at 08:09 PM.
Originally Posted by BigBoogieman
Would you mind posting what other mods are on that car?
TXS Exhaust
TXS FMIC
700cc Inj.
Walbro Fuel Pump
TXS Intake
UTEC
Stock Block, Stock Cams.
Thanks,
Jermaine~
www.turboxs.com
Guys, will you be making EGT kit for tuner pro and possibly incorporating the EGT column into UTEC?
I couldn't care less about speed density
and I think this would actually be more usefull than speed density for us that don't drag race and need insane amounts of whp.
10x
I couldn't care less about speed density
and I think this would actually be more usefull than speed density for us that don't drag race and need insane amounts of whp.10x
Thats a Tuner feature.. but I have requested that additional column for EGT on the tuner output for the UTEC also, the Tuner has several aux inputs that could be useful for logging some sorts of data.. I'd like to be able to append all of that data if its available.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TitanMotorsport
Evo Vendor 'Group Buy / Specials' Classifieds
0
Sep 10, 2012 02:19 PM
MalibuJack
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
124
Jan 12, 2011 11:23 PM





