Switch to MAP sensor?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX.
Switch to MAP sensor?
Ok, I was wondering what would be the PROS and CONS on switching my evo to MAP (either a 3 bar or 3.5 bar...or whatever). What are some things I need to consider...
the piggyback I have is pre set-up for map...
my car is running strong now! But considering this to take care of my MAF, and the constant crap with idling with intake and all.... PROS AND CONS on MAP please
the piggyback I have is pre set-up for map...
my car is running strong now! But considering this to take care of my MAF, and the constant crap with idling with intake and all.... PROS AND CONS on MAP please
If you go to MAP you will fix your idle most likley. You could probably even go to the AEM standalone and fix your idle problem without converting to MAP right away so you can have time to learn the system. Bottom line is with MAP you will make more power, how much more it depends but it will increase as you go up in power but you driveability will be harder to tune at first. You give one for the other but a good tune can make the best of both worlds for getting better gas mileage and more power both.
Be aware you won't make a ton more but it will be somthing. Race gas will be a different story though if you don't have timing control now and you do after a MAP setup.
The only other Con of MAP would be if you use a standalone it can be difficult to tune all at once and if you have a issue that you don't have time to fix it can be a bit of a pain to rehook up the stock ECU and map sensor.
Be aware you won't make a ton more but it will be somthing. Race gas will be a different story though if you don't have timing control now and you do after a MAP setup.
The only other Con of MAP would be if you use a standalone it can be difficult to tune all at once and if you have a issue that you don't have time to fix it can be a bit of a pain to rehook up the stock ECU and map sensor.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX.
I'm not going AEM.. I already have a piggyback on for over a yr and am very happy
:
http://psifimotorsports.com/ECU.htm
: http://psifimotorsports.com/ECU.htm
Originally Posted by mobounce
I'm not going AEM.. I already have a piggyback on for over a yr and am very happy
:
http://psifimotorsports.com/ECU.htm
: http://psifimotorsports.com/ECU.htm
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX.
Awesome, thanks GT
Would you say MAP is the better choice, or is it more of preference? Is the safety margin different on each setup (map or maf) Is there any more of ease or difficulty in tuning? any more feedback would be great!
Would you say MAP is the better choice, or is it more of preference? Is the safety margin different on each setup (map or maf) Is there any more of ease or difficulty in tuning? any more feedback would be great!
Last edited by mobounce; Jun 1, 2005 at 12:33 PM.
Originally Posted by mobounce
Awesome, thanks GT
Would you say MAP is the better choice, or is it more of preference? Is the safety margin different on each setup (map or maf) Is there any more of ease or difficulty in tuning? any more feedback would be great!
Would you say MAP is the better choice, or is it more of preference? Is the safety margin different on each setup (map or maf) Is there any more of ease or difficulty in tuning? any more feedback would be great!If you can't ditch the MAF I would go to a blow through MAF unit. Not many people run them but if you are willing to take the time you could probably make it near perfect in every situation and have the best of both worlds.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2006GSR
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Aug 12, 2013 07:35 AM
Methodical4u
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Jun 27, 2008 02:08 PM
blaze_125
Lancer Tires, Wheels, Brakes & Suspension - Sponsored by The Tire Rack
7
Jun 17, 2004 11:27 AM
chinalfr
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Sep 24, 2003 06:35 AM




