thanks.

I think I was talking to you at NE Dragway a couple of weeks ago... did you have the dynoflashed ECU that was messed up? I think you were trapping like 106 or 107....

 

yeah that was me unfortunatly, i am now running a ecu+ setup and it runs alot stronger. however i ran into some turbo issues (aftermarket) so the car hasnt been run on ecu+ and stock turbo yet.

 

russ can you get him my map since you have it on your computer?

 

pierre FYI that dyno does not read LOW especially on SAE correction, i think the difference between my car from sae to standard was about 10 whp on that dyno

go to KTR if you think that reads low, youd be looking at 280 maybe.

 

actually it reads slightly lower than a dynojet wich is what most people base their numbers off of on the site. so for him to say that it is a low reading dyno is a true statement. i think that someone is just mad that they are going to get put on now... hahaha

 

Nice! Can't wait to replace the SAFC with ECU+ this weekend and tune it. I had a reflash too but flashed back to stock due to problem with timing too high when tuned with the SAFC with the new turbo.

 

good luck, i have a feeling that you will see great results with the ecu+

 

Thanks! I need that. Last time I used previous version of ECU+ and got P0300 which maybe because of the flash.

 

yeah i have the p0300 as well, but it did not effect the tuning at all. i wasnt misfiring like the code said, there is just somehting about the ecu+ that throws the code.

 

Looks like a boost increase got you that power, is that correct?

 

yeah i believe that he was running 22psi peak and tapering off to 19-20

 

jons dyno reads a little high for torque then most other people that have run on different dynos within the same day, its all in the calibration. Id say the numbers are right on dynojet + a little torque ESPECIALLY IN SAE calibration, im sure you dont know the difference between the two anyways

also read the graph 24 psi is what jon inputed, just like precision said more boost = more power

finally pierre can put me on, took ya long enough jk but remember im waiting for a 12.79@108.1 or better timeslip before any bs is thrown

i guess i need to actually break my ghetto modding budget now to hang with these cammed evos

if all else fails ill trade cars with derek for the night

 

I like the software, they did a nice job

 

yes the dyno does read high in tq i could have told you that but i once again stated hp, and yes i understand the concept of calibration and SAE calibration. however, i get the feeling that someone is quite bitter because they only got to run their car on this dyno while it was reading "low" to tell you the truth i could give a **** less of when your car or any other was run. if you look at the baseline pull to what he left with it shows significant gains and in the tuning world thats all that matters.

in regards to pierre finally being able to put you on, if i remember correctly hes put you on before now its just going to be alot easier. oh and a cammed evo timeslip with a good tune with throw alot quicker of a time that a 12.79 @108, if you would like a copy of one i can send you quite a few...

oh yeah did i mention that even if derek did let you take his car you would completly missing the point of an evo being able to put your car on. but either way ill run you in dereks car.... oh and ill give you a two car length head start.

now when you show me a quicker timeslip than a 12.4 @112 then maybe you can talk to me about all of these technical DIFFERENCES (yes i like using caps lock to point stuff out just like you) that you THINK you know about. until then happy modding and stop trying to start **** in a forum where you dont even own one of the cars.

 

Please stay on topic.

--Dan
Mach V
MachEVO.com